Forecast
70°
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Owner plans to raze historic Nags Head cottage

Posted to: News North Carolina


The historic Winslow cottage is slated for demolition after its owner was denied approval for renovations by the State Historic Preservation Office. (Catherine Kozak | The Virginian-Pilot)



NAGS HEAD

When Robbie Morris bought the Winslow cottage, he had no intention of tearing it down. But after nearly a year working to preserve the 1929 structure, Morris said his best intentions have been frustrated and his wallet has been depleted.

The oceanfront house, part of the Nags Head Beach Cottage Row Historic District, is to be torn down as early as next week.

"I am heartsick," Morris said Wednesday. "I have done everything I can do to restore this and I have done everything to go through the unnecessary hoops.

"I tried to do the right thing."

Morris, who is from Richmond but lives most of the time in Nags Head, said he bought the cottage in December for $1,020,000, planning to make it his year-round home. He hired John White, an architect-artist from Manns Harbor, to draw up plans for an addition of a two-story balcony. Plans included moving the house about 100 feet back and installing a swimming pool for health reasons.

But in February, the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office denied his application, he said, telling him that the new wing was too "bulky." In further discussions with the state, Morris said that to maintain the historic designation, he'd have to remove the second level on the planned balcony, which would then force him to move the stairway.

Without the state's approval, Morris said he would not qualify for $20,000 each in state and federal tax credits. That made the cost of moving and restoring the house too expensive.

Morris has decided to build a 4,990-square-foot house from scratch, including the wing he wanted. He plans to salvage as much as he can from the old cottage. The idea is similar to what was done with the Nixon cottage, which was torn down and rebuilt to look almost exactly the same.

The Winslow cottage, formerly owned by Elizabeth Winslow Baumgartner, has its original wood floors, beadboard walls and ceilings, porcelain doorknobs, and brick fireplace. According to a 2000 news article, central heat and air conditioning and an upstairs tile bathroom had been added. After the Ash Wednesday storm in 1962, the roof was replaced and the kitchen was updated.

"The house itself has been altered a lot," said Cola Vaughan, the Nags Head Realtor who sold the house to Morris. "But that's the thing - all these houses have. So it's not historically pristine anyway."

Vaughan said houses in the historic district are subjected to harsher conditions than old houses not on the oceanfront. Nails rust, wood floors warp and supporting beams rot, he said. For a restoration to be done properly, often the cottage has to be taken apart and reassembled piece by piece.

Although the town has tried in the past 20 years to create a citizen's committee to preserve the historic district, homeowners have resisted. But Vaughan said that is because the preservation conditions are "too hard, too intrusive, too punitive, too expensive."

"People are not going to spend the kind of money that's necessary to restore these properties without some kind of help," he said. "It's prohibitively expensive.

"We're talking about a long-term obligation that goes down through generations."

 

Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Update on new comment functions.

Ried please re-read the article!

The guy is trying to renovate an old structure and include things that will make it work for him. The bureaucracy doesn't want to make any--as in NONE--reasonable accommodation. Since there is nothing that precludes him from tearing the house down he has that option. So rather than find a compromise they'd rather have him tear it down completely--isn't that brilliant?!. Don't see where there is "greed" you charge. The guy has spent money to hire a competent architect, propose changes and what does he get for the effort? A complete turn down. So now he is turning the other option he has to accomplish what he wants. Just how is that greed? Get real.

Go Figure

This building is so historically important that the owner can't make renovations to it, but it would be OK to just tear it down. Makes not sense.

HMMM

...my house....my property...buy it from me...and move it!!!...or go away!!!

Where's the line?

I always wondered where the line was between historic and old. 1929 isn't even all that old.

Watch this......

If he's depleted his funds how the heck can he afford to build one three times it's size? I think the subject of this story is "I'll show you"! I could have done without reading this GREED story today Mr Pilot. While alot of people are wondering how they are going to pay their mortgages, you guys run a story that no one, repeat, no one gives a dern about.

Historical societies are unreasonable!

You would think it would be in the best interest of the historical society to work with this owner to come up with a compromise. I guess instead it is just easier to make these denials when you don't own the property. Just another case of mismanaged special interest waste.

Throw-away society

I am all for preserving historic structures, unlike the city of VB where nothing is more than 50 years old. But wouldn't a reasonably savvy person have done the homework to figure out what he would or wouldn't be able to do before plunking down a million bucks? Perhaps this was planned all along...hmmmm.

MacMansion

The old cottage looks very charming. But charming doesn't cut it with todays folks. I'm sure it will be another
beautiful MacMansion.

PLEASE think outside of the beach box!

Why not sell the house to someone who will relocate it as they did with the First Colony Inn? It would save the house and provide the current owner with money towards building a new house. And PLEASE do it in the old Nags Head style!

I don't blame this man. I

I don't blame this man. I would do the same thing!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More News Stories

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox