71°
forecast

State balks at effort to ease military kids' transitions

Posted to: Military Virginia

Kaléa Leverette, the daughter of a Navy commander, went to sixth grade in Florida, crossed the globe for seventh grade in Japan, then moved to Virginia for eighth grade.

Each school had a different curriculum, a different grading system and a different set of standardized tests.

She ended up taking pre-algebra twice and world history three times, but missed U.S. history altogether. She also had to make up several Virginia Standards of Learning tests.

On top of the academic obstacles, she lost the opportunity to become a cheerleader during the fall of her eighth-grade year, she said, because she arrived in Suffolk too late for the August tryouts.

Kaléa, now 15, is one of more than 60,000 students from military families in Hampton Roads who face extra academic, social and emotional challenges because of the frequent moves and separations that are part of military life.

“The transition is probably the hardest part for me, transitioning to a new neighborhood, to a new house, to a new school, to new friends,” said Kaléa, who is a straight-A student. “It’s hard for military kids to be caught up with all the students who have lived here all their lives.”

A new interstate agreement seeks to make school transitions a little easier for military children like Kaléa by standardizing how states deal with a host of issues, including record transfers, enrollment, graduation requirements and extracurricular activities.

Eleven states have signed on to the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children so far. But Virginia, which has the second-largest military population in the country, has not.

 

Del. Mark Cole, a Republican from Spotsylvania, sponsored a bill in the last legislative session that would have added Virginia to the compact. By joining, the state would earn a seat on the commission that will craft legislation addressing how the member states handle military children’s school transfers. It also would agree to rules set out in the compact.

Virginia’s House approved the measure in February, but it stalled in the Senate because of concerns regarding state sovereignty and the potential impact on school districts, said state Sen. Kenneth Stolle, R-Virginia Beach .

“I’m not a fan of compacts, and I don’t think we should delegate our authority or responsibility, you know, to some other organization,” he said. “You just can’t have a group of non-Virginians telling Virginia what the law’s going to be with regard to education policy, even though they’re for military dependents.”

Stolle, whose father served in the Navy, also questioned the need for such legislation.

“You would think by reading the bill that we don’t do all those things already,” he said. “We make every effort, every reasonable effort, to accommodate military families.”

In 2006, the General Assembly passed a law allowing military children to continue attending school in one division even if military orders require the family to move to base housing elsewhere. Virginia also allows school divisions to accept standardized tests from other states to satisfy SOL requirements for graduation and provides training for educators in partnership with the Military Child Education Coalition.

Some school divisions, including Norfolk, Chesapeake and Virginia Beach, have their own military-focused programs and training.

Cole said he was surprised by the Senate’s opposition because Virginia is a member of several other interstate agreements and can vote to withdraw its membership at any time.

“It has overwhelming support, which is part of the reason why I was surprised it had a hard time in the Senate,” he said. “Given the number of military dependents we have in the commonwealth, I think it’s the right thing to do.”

 

Janene Stocking, a mother of three and a Navy wife, said that officials, teachers and fellow parents at the schools her children attended in Michigan and Williamsburg just didn’t understand the military lifestyle.

She and her children received little community support there, she said. But that changed when they moved to Norfolk last summer.

Blair Middle School quickly placed her son Mac, now 12, in honors classes. And Sewells Point Elementary School invited her daughter Julia, now 8, to join a weekly program for military children where guidance counselors lead activities and discussions to help with separation anxiety during deployments, she said.

“It just blew my mind that, you know, this was done and the kids actually got that support outside of the home,” Stocking said. “I didn’t even have to go looking for it, they just did it.”

About a third of Norfolk students are from military families, so the division knows how to help them, said Gary Sigler, a counselor at Sewells Point Elementary, which is about 90 percent military. The school offers mentorship programs, tutoring to help new students adjust to the Virginia curriculum, an after-school program called Operation Hero and other forms of support.

While primary-school transfers are relatively simple, it can be difficult to coordinate record transfers and provide proof of address, which is required to enroll, when a family is still looking for housing, Sigler said.

And, as the Stocking family experienced, not every school division is as accommodating as Norfolk’s.

Things get even more complicated at the high school level.

“For high school, it’s a whole different issue,” said Marian Leverette, Kaléa’s mother and the school outreach educator for the Navy’s Fleet and Family Support Centers of Hampton Roads. There’s “a whole different social issue and their concern is college.”

Grade-point averages may suddenly change when adjusted to a new school’s grading scale. A star athlete may move midseason and be unable to join the new team. Students may have to make up classes and standardized tests to meet the new school division’s graduation requirements.

That’s on top of having to make friends and redefine themselves in a new social environment, said Claudia Sweeney, a guidance counselor at Lake Taylor High School in Norfolk.

 

Kaléa’s father, Navy Cmdr. Glen Leverette, said he has considered leaving the service because of the strain frequent moves put on his family.

“I know that she’s only going to be a child one time,” he said. “But then you realize that for the service of your country and the duty of defending it against the bad guys, it’s worth it. … It’s the reason why I’m still in.”

To spare Kaléa another move, he has decided to go alone to his next duty station. That way, she can finish high school in Suffolk.

That pressure is why the Department of Defense set out to resolve some of the school-transfer issues military children face by working with The Council of State Governments to create the compact, said Lt. Col. Les’ Melnyk, a Department of Defense spokesman.

“This is not just something we’re doing to make people feel good,” Melnyk said. “This is a readiness issue for the military. If military life is stressing a person, then the person is less likely to stick with it.”

While the compact won’t solve all the challenges associated with being a military kid, Melnyk said, “we really believe that if we can smooth this transition, it goes a really long way in making the moves easier.”

The initiative has gained support from the National Military Family Association, the Military Child Education Coalition and the Military Officers Association of America, among others.

Del. Cole plans to resubmit his bill for the upcoming legislative session in January, but said its chances may be slim because it carries a roughly $80,000 annual price tag.

The cost is relatively small, he said, but “given the budget situation, it may be difficult to get anything that costs any money through next year.”

In the meantime, he is working to garner additional support from veterans and military organizations.

“Military families already sacrifice enough to serve the country,” he said. “There’s no reason their children should have to sacrifice their educational opportunities.”

Kathy Adams, (757) 446-2583, kathy.adams@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Wonderful

Very Good article, cheers for the advice. I will absolutely be book-marking this blog making sure that I may observe more responses. Have you been posting additional threads such as this one? I'd like to subscribe to the RSS feed if you will. I did have a shot, but the RSS link in my web browser does not seem to be doing the job. Please let me know. free walmart gift card

military-kids-challenges-are-part-territory

military-kids-challenges-are-part-territory

ralph polo

To Homestead or not to Homestead, that is the question...

The military has been looking into Homesteading some of it's force. The reason why they move them is not because of tradition there is a very important reason to move people, it's called transition. If GM, Capital One, Verizon, or any other company in the free market had as many people always leaving then coming in you would have these compaines moving people around. Case in point, Raytheon. Because of the extent of their world wide contracts they are always looking for people to move to Germany, Japan, and other places. Another case in point is Capital One. During the mid 90's they we begging people to move to other locations because of new center openings and attrition.

The only way to ensure a force is able to meet the needs of the mission is to move people around. Some however; are in a position to homestead. Like my father who spent 10 years in MCAS Beaufort. Or people in Norfolk who "ship hop" and keep their familes there for many years.

Why all the moves?

Has no one considered changing the military. The military that has policies left over from the start of our nation, much of which no longer makes sense or works. It can't be cheep to constantly move personnel and families all over the world yet they do it for the flimsiest reasons. We moved every 18 months for over 10 years. Most the moves, not all, had little reason except policy. We could save so much money as a nation on our military if we just made it more efficient with it's personnel. Just because it's the way it's always been done should no longer be an accepted answer to why.

Help Me Please!!!!

Help me please! I grew up in a Navy family! I went to different schools! My Dad was here, then gone, my schools changed, I struggled to get into college, I had to take classes all over again,then we moved again! 30 years ago, this article would never have even been mentioned, let alone printed! Well, seeing as the government bailed out Wall St. it makes sense that the govt. should step in and bail out the kids and the parents. While your at it, could you all bail me out? I deserve another college education! I deserve lower taxes, good roads, lower prperty taxes! I deserve it, Please, let the state of VA and the Federal govt step in. I shouldn't have to have so much hardship since I served my country! United Socialist States of America here we come!

VA Standards

I have to agree to most of the comments I read. I do have to say that when we were overseas in Italy while my kids did well there when we came back stateside there was no SUPPORT at all for my kids. Va Beach even told us that our son who should be a Sr. this year needed to go to OPEN CAMPUS because the school dist. did not accept all his credits and he was a then 11th grade with 10th grade credits. It was devistating to him. He was in ROTC in Italy and was honor roll. Here not only did we move after the term began but when even the guidance dept. was so negative my son gave up. He saw no way out and quit trying. I am not asking that standards be lowered or anything like that but these kids do need some help with credits that may be missing. It is not there fault if the school they came from only required 1 year of a foriegn language and then get told now you need 3 and you only have 1 year to do that in. There has to be someway to help these kids. It is not their faults that they get up rooted every 3 years.

Virginia is ahead, so why not lead

I'm a military brat and a VA public school teacher. I have experience on both ends of this issue. The Virginia standards are ahead of many states, so there would be a benefit to joining this effort and leading it. It would be necessary to be leaders however, because our standards should not be lowered.

whose problem is it?

I'm the son of a Naval officer, and I agree 100% with CharlesR. Let the feds pay for it, and let Virginia build the bridges so the transplants that clog our roads can get to work/base/school.

recruiting teachers -

For charles-

Our particular duty station did hire the military wives that had teaching experience and yes, they were execeptional. Overall those classes were no different than the states. Those teachers had specific college. The problem being that there were not enough in the right area opening vacant areas which "filled". There needs to be a guideline of removing such teachers when sufficent data supports -despite tenure,etc. It is not a sevice for the childeren/parents to endure that problem along with the stress of moving and setting up household at the next duty station. Again, the overall was very favorable and memorable and we would do it again, just differently.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


Partners

 

special features