Tight credit, uncertain market make it tough for buyers

Posted to: Business Real Estate News

Since she put her Norfolk rental home on the market four months ago, Robyn Hofheimer has lowered the asking price three times. Still no bites.

Hofheimer, 31, and her husband own two houses in Norfolk. They live in one and rent the other. Now, the couple want to sell both and move to Virginia Beach, where they grew up. Timing isn't on their side.

"The market is just not moving out there at all," she said.

At the peak of the housing boom three years ago, it took less than a month on average to sell a home in Hampton Roads. Economists at Old Dominion University expect the average will rise to nearly three months by the end of this year.

In the past two years, the number of homes for sale in Hampton Roads has skyrocketed to historic levels amid the largest housing market slowdown in more than a decade. In August, 14,894 homes were unsold - nearly four times as many homes as were on the market in August 2005, according to the Real Estate Information Network, the local multiple listing service. Its figures include South Hampton Roads, the Peninsula, and outlying regions including Williamsburg and northeastern North Carolina.

At the current sales rate, it would take 10 months to work through the backlog of homes for sale. At the peak of the housing boom, the supply ran as low as one month. The ODU economists say a four- to six-month supply is normal.

At the same time, foreclosure-related filings in the Hampton Roads region have more than tripled in the past year, according to RealtyTrac, which reported that in August one in every 959 homes in the region was in some stage of foreclosure. If foreclosures continue to rise, that pushes more homes onto the market.

As the supply of homes for sale rises, the number of potential buyers is falling. A tight credit market is making it harder to get a mortgage, and this month the federal government did away with a program that allowed buyers to get a no-money-down mortgage.

"Fewer people are qualifying for loans," said Ron Foresta, president of Rose & Womble Realty's resale division. "Either the down payment is not there, or they have low credit ratings."

The result is falling home prices across the region and long waits for homeowners hoping to sell their property.

Builders and homeowners alike have marked down asking prices and are offering incentives to get contracts. Realtors have said it is common to see a price on a particular home fall $25,000 in one month.

The median price for a new home in South Hampton Roads was $325,000 in August, down 4 percent in the past year and nearly 20 percent in the past two years, from $404,090, according to estimates by the local multiple listing service.

Individual homeowners have been reluctant to lower asking prices. In August, the median price for an existing home was $231,000, down 2.9 percent from a year ago but up slightly from 2006.

Real estate experts said many homeowners are asking unrealistic prices.

"Sometimes they don't necessarily listen to what their agent is saying," said Shirley Conner, a broker with Prudential Decker Realty. "A lot of people start out at what they would like to get for it. Then when they don't get any showings, they reassess it."

Vinod B. Agarwal, an economist at ODU, said individual homeowners usually take longer to lower their prices because they are more vested in their homes.

"Sellers see that their neighbor sold their home last year for $400,000, and they still think they should sell theirs for $450,000," he said. "Until the sellers realize that this is no longer the same market as 2005, it's going to take awhile to get through this inventory."

Agarwal predicted existing home prices will fall by as much as 5 percent in the next three months.

Gina Wilkinson, a real estate agent for Prudential Decker Realty, said homeowners with financial problems are coming into the market in droves, hoping to sell a home and unload a mortgage they can no longer afford.

"You've got people who can't sell properties because they haven't really owned them long enough to have any equity in them," Wilkinson said. "I run into people all the time who took money out of their homes but didn't put that money back into the home. Yet they have a new BMW in the driveway."

Some home sellers seem to be getting the picture. Two weeks ago, Mari-Ann Messick put her Virginia Beach house up for sale in hopes of trading it in for one closer to the beach.

Messick, 45, and her husband bought the three-bedroom home in the Lake Shores neighborhood in 1992 for $142,000. She listed the house last month for $345,000.

"Two and a half years ago, we could have easily gotten $400,000 or $425,000 for our house," she said. "Now I wouldn't even dream of listing it for that much. Nobody would even look at it."

The glut of existing homes is making builders retrench and look for ways to keep revenue coming in as new home construction slows.

"All of us are down right now," said Terry Gearhart, vice president of marketing for home builder Terry Peterson Cos. "Everyone had to adjust pricing. We have to move inventory."

Gearhart stressed there are still pockets of strength across the region, including his firm's Sajo Farm development in Virginia Beach, which has homes starting around $300,000.

He said sales have been so strong at the 295-home community that Terry Peterson is considering raising prices.

For buyers, the abundant supply normally would make this an ideal time to start scanning the market for deals, with plenty of options and low interest rates. But turmoil in the banking system has potential first-time buyers such as Denise Watson a little wary.

Watson, 37, of Norfolk, and her husband have never owned a home. The couple live in base housing at Norfolk Naval Station. She is a nurse, and her husband is a military policeman.

"We thought about buying a house last year," she said. "But the people we knew in real estate told us to hold off until this year."

Now the couple has mixed feelings.

"You don't want to buy a house for $350,000, then six months later it drops to $300,000," she said.

Josh Brown, (757) 446-2318, josh.brown@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Ira, isn't your question

that the Dems voted down some FM2 oversight? I said yes, but, what seems to be overlooked is what happened to the sub primes after the investment banks got a hold of them. What happened to AIG was over leveraging for a quick buck. The same holds true for the CDO's. The subprime loans by themselves would not take down the economy. Wall Street got drunk on them and off we went. So many people want all the blame to be on the mortgage holder and the Dems. Why don't we blame the concept of a mortgage, period? That started all of it. Before such lending became available, you had to buy a house for cash. I understand the impact of sub prime and its effect on housing prices, but the rampant trading and investing in exotic and fraudulently rated investment vehicles was strictly a Wall Street issue.

joanie and Don

First Len: No you didn't. You don't seem to understand the subject. More importantly, my letters were an attempt to dispute YOUR political finger pointing. When confronted w/ the true cause and shared blame you bob and weave aaround the subject. Please stay focused.

Joanie is correct that deflation is happening. That could be good or bad, depending on how much cash you have. It is pretty simple, people will sell stuff for less when in need. Those w/ liquidity can buy more stuff for less. It is also an indicator of reccesion and depressions though. The fed cannot do much except add money to the pot via interest rates. Either way, hold onto your hats. Those who want a political blame or solution will be selling their stuff soon as they do not beleive in cycles. Don, I do not believe oil is part of this. Obviously demand is lower and the actual cost has been inflated due to trading and recent stoms near refineries. Thanks for the thoughts Joanie.

So, Ira, I did answer your question

The seeds are FM2, but the crisis is greed on Wall Street. And AIG is a big part of what I am talking about. The details may vary, but the body is still dead. If it weren't for the leverage and fraudulent investments instruments using the subprime mortgage loans, the problem would be minor. Throw in general credit abuse (personal and international), which, BTW, is very much a result of the war and the shrinking income of the middle class, and you have what we are now facing. The US economy held off this mess for about 6 years on the credit card and home equity loans of the wage earner. Now the wage earner is under water. So, actually, what you want me to say, that the Dems voted down some FM2 reform, is insignificant. So please take a closer look at the real issues, which are rampant greed and malfeasance in the investment world. If you want a good example, look at Iceland's woes…nothing to do with the Dems and FM2.

so len

You'r not going to answer the questions?

BTW, AIG is a little different. Well...a lot diferent actually.

Don

It appears your post describes deflation. That is why the Fed and the world banks lowered their rates today, the money supply was getting tight. Your best friend during deflation is cash and liquid assets. Your worst enemy is debt and illiquid assets (home or land).

My bad

My bad

"the author didn't fail math, you failed reading comprehension."

But was an insult needed?

Ira, I am saddened that you are tired of it

But I have said over and over that the "seed" may have been FM2 and the Dems didn't help in that respect. But Lehman didn't go under because of FM2, nor did Bear Stearns, nor AIG. They were all crushed by horrible bets made by greedy executives who were interested in the short term profit that bad paper obfuscated by mathematical chicanery allowed, strictly so they could collect bonuses. And those collapses are what we are dealing with now. The easing of the leverage requirements in 2004 made it even worse. 35:1 is irresponsible and outrageous. So while the focus was on FM2, the secret deals in Wall Street blindsided our economy. And, that is what makes me tired. Tired of conservatives not recognizing that you cannot leave capitalists unsupervised, because they will bet the bank, collect the fees and leave us with a sorry mess. Don, on the oil question, I am not that well versed in oil economics/finance, but I will poke around because it sounds fascinating.

The Oil Standard?

There is something peculiar going on here that I haven't completely figured out. There has been no major increase in the supply of oil, nor any deep drop in demand, yet, as the Dow has fallen, so has the price of oil. If we assume that the value of oil has remained steady, is the Dow really falling, or is the value of the dollar rising, or at least falling more slowly than other currencies?

The real measure of wealth is not how many dollars you have but what your dollars will buy. If oil is a good standard of measure, then it would seem that in terms of how much oil the securities in my IRA will buy, the fall in the Dow really hasn't hurt me.

I understand economics pretty well, but I am not that strong on finance, (some of you will know the difference) so, AM, Ira, Len, what do you think is really going on? Is this really just a worldwide contraction in the money supply that really doesn't mean much?

real estate agents and Mortgage companies say

Real Estate agents and Mortgage Companies told you to "sign here". You can buy a $250K house even though you only qualify for a $100K home, and home values always go up. Wrong!

Now who do you blame?

I blame the buyer, the agent, and the mortgage company.

You get a new credit card in the mail. Do you throw it away? No! You go on a shopping spree.
For the most part people are to blame for their own spending habits with no though of tomorrow, and not a penny in savings.

Easy question Len

Did McCain co-sponsor a bil that was aimed DIRECTLY at the FM's due to their interior abuses?

Is the reason this bill did not pass due to opposition from Democrats?

Your trying to alleviete blame from where it belongs. We are all tired of it. Just answer the questions yes or no. If you cannot, just waive your flag quietly.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed    Real Estate News rss feed   



Toolbox