The Virginian-Pilot
©
Three out of four Virginians think global warming is real and most want government at all levels - federal, state and local - to take actions to fight it, according to a statewide opinion poll released Tuesday.
Authors described the poll of 660 state residents as one of the first and most comprehensive snapshots of how Virginians of all ages, backgrounds and political sympathies feel about one of the great environmental issues of the era.
The Virginia Climate Survey was conducted by phone interviews between Sept. 4 and 24 and was financed with grants from private foundations and donors through the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia. It has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.
Among its findings, 39 percent of respondents think human activity spurs climate change by the burning of fossil fuels, 20 percent think the Earth is simply going through a natural warming cycle, and another 30 percent say a combination of natural and man-made causes are to blame.
Among believers, 61 percent think global warming is a "very serious" problem, and 72 percent want government to "take immediate action."
The most popular policy option, according to the poll, is requiring power companies to generate electricity with a prescribed percentage of renewable energies, such as wind, solar, geothermal and biomass.
Increased gasoline taxes and a carbon tax finished last on a list of 15 options offered to survey participants.
Nuclear energy was fairly popular as an alternative source, with 30 percent "strongly supporting" its expansion in Virginia and 14 percent "strongly opposing" it.
Virginia Dominion Power, the state's largest electric utility, is seeking government approval to build at least one new nuclear reactor at its Lake Anna power station northwest of Richmond.
Barry Rabe, a visiting scholar at the Miller Center, who helped to oversee the poll, said the results "roughly mirror" those seen nationally. For example, 75 percent of Virginians think global warming is occurring; nationwide, 71 percent think so.
Similarly, 13 percent of state residents don't think global warming is really happening; 21 percent nationally feel the same way.
During a presentation of the findings Tuesday, Rabe said he was especially struck by the "across-the-board" belief that all levels of government are responsible for fixing the problem.
The poll comes as the governor's Commission on Climate Change winds down its yearlong study of how best to reach a key goal established by Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's administration - reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by 2025.
Secretary of Natural Resources L. Preston Bryant Jr. said the poll should provide political cover in the state General Assembly, where any Virginia-specific global-warming programs would need to be approved.
Showing such widespread support for government action to reluctant state delegates and senators, Bryant said, "hopefully will mean something, that so many Virginians believe this is real and important."
The co-author of the poll, Christopher Borick, director of the Institute of Public Opinion at Muhlenberg College in Allentown, Pa., said one key question asked of Virginians is why they believe or don't believe in global warming.
The No. 1 response among believers is personal experience - "they felt, personally, that things were warmer," Borick said. The second-most popular was evidence that glaciers and polar ice are melting.
One percent said they were convinced by former Vice President Al Gore's award-winning documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth."
The top reason offered by skeptics is that natural patterns sufficiently explain any fluctuation in temperatures. Twelve percent gave no reason, and 5 percent said the media is misleading the public about the issue.
Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Supposed "warming" on Jupiter and Mars
The scientific ignorance here re: global warming is astounding. Stop spreading outright, anti-scientific lies that there is global warming on Mars or Jupiter. Specifically, see http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2005/10/global-warming-on-mars/langswitch_lang/en. End of story re: Mars "warming". It does not exist. Furthermore, there is no evidence of Jupiter warming either. The only studies that have been done are about a redistribution of warm and cool areas on Jupiter; nothing at all about "warming". Stick to *peer-reviewed* science by actual climate scientist from now on.
Global warming is unequivocal. It is basic physics and conservation of energy. There is no explanation of the warming of the past 35 years that can be explained by natural variation alone. Not cosmic rays, not solar variation. It's greenhouse gases. Deal with it.
Mini Ice Age facts out there everywhere
The most recent (1645 to 1715) known for the scientist Maunder, called the Maunder Minimum. In case this fact escapes some of the uneducated there weren't any of those "evil" oil companies around when it happened (or electric power plants, cars, trucks, etc. for that matter) and was documented around the world. It's believed these periods of extreme cold were related to a lack of sunspots--something we're seeing in development right now.
No references = just more "kool/kook-aid" opinions...
Not a thing stopping y'all from posting up all these scientific references that y'all claim refute Global Warming Science (guess they don't exist then, eh?) and support such silly opinions and beliefs...
Otherwise it's just nattering nabobs saying whatever crosses their minds, based on the kool-aid that exxonmobil, NAM, coal associations have been serving up for more than the decade.
If you want to read about how this got started, 30 years, back, here is a nice pair of references that highlights the role of the primogenitor of global warming skeptics, William A. Nierenberg... a great scientist who went to the dark side.
Y'all spouting these "sounds like science" sillinesses do know how to read, don't ya? That's the read and understand meaning, not read and just make sounds...
-------------------
From The Sunday Times
September 7, 2008
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/en
No scientific basis for MAN-MADE Global Warming
Calpurnia, First, all studies can be twisted to say what the researchers want to them to say. Second, none of the studies you cite can reasonably conclude a direct link between man's activities and any warming. Third, there has been a global cooling trend the last 10 years even though CO2 has continued to increase!!! Fourth, 30 years ago they were predicting an ice age - scientists are often wrong and tend to come up with results that the people giving them the money for research want to hear. Fifth, the global warming scare is an attempt to gain power by the tree-huggers. I am all for good stewardship of the earth but the eco-nuts are crazy.
So keep giving us your cites to the studies which are skewed while ignoring the studies which conclude differently.
I would sure like to know who they "polled"
because most of the people I know and talk to in the workplace, church, and neighborhood thinks the global wraming cash machine is a load of garbage.
Remember when global cooling was going to plunge us into an ice age? (Ten years ago National Geographic documented this)
Remember when acid rain was going to kill every tree?
Remember when the thinning of the ozone layer was going to fry everyone? (the freon manufacturers made billions on that one)
Remember when population growth would all have us standing on a two square foot space of our own?
Remember when radon gas was going to kill everyone with a basement?
Remember when tooth fillings were poisoning everyone?
Remember when saccharin was causing cancer (proven false, but warnings are still mandated)
Remember when salt caused high blood pressure?
Remember when cell phones caused brain tumors?
Remember when chlorinated water caused bir
What flavor are you drinking calpurnia??
I think the kool-aid was specially developed and delivered by certain politically tilted organizations. For you to say that I'm drinking Exxon's kool-aid is a stitch, seeing as I have given a plethora of information and non-partisan starting points for people interested in facts to look at. Did you do the web search for Jupiter Warming? Probably not because you already had your politically motivated and operated links at the ready. Seems to me that you wouldn't be able to get all of these scientists and laboratories throughout the world to agree on what we are seeing throughout our solar system, yet that's exactly what happened. While you and your fellow kool-aid drinkers, worshipping at the al gore altar just stick with the "sky is falling" argument. By the way, there is a reason many of the researchers and scientists sued to have their signatures removed from the IPCC report. That is because it is politically motivated and wasn't fact. Kool-Aid indeed...
Ice Age? Substantiate that... if you can...
What ice age? Says who? Some blogista??
More of the ExxonMobil funded disinformation campaign... with no scientific basis.
If folks can't provide references and substantiate their wasteful utterances so others can cross-check and verify their assertions, they what they say is meaningless...
I can see it now...
...classes of school children huddled together for warmth during the extreme, prolonged cold of the upcoming mini Ice Age (brought on by forces of Nature totally beyond the control of humans), watching the movie "An Inconvenient Truth" and laughing at it throughout. Then Al Gore will re-release that movie and vie for an Academy Award nomination for Best Comedy.
Sunspots & dumbspots...
Problem with those willing to say dumb things is they can never substantiate their "beliefs." More and more it seems folks read stuff on blogs, don't bother to verify them, and then go about echo-ditto'ing junk science they think sounds clever.
If folks think the current recession/depression is painful, wait until US economy goes into permanent "reaction" mode to global warmings messing with primary productivity.
Here's some URLs, with solid scientific credentials for the disinformation victims:
No Sunshine for Global Warming Skeptics
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=no-sunshine-for-global-wa
Solar evidence points to human causes of climate change
http://www.physorg.com/news122655339.html
Sunspots Are Fewest Since 1954, but Significance Is Unclear
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/03/science/space/03sun.html?_r=2&ref=slogin&oref=slogin
Clima
Extraordinary ignorance
We see quite a bit of ignorance on display here. We are pumping 8 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year. That's one ton of CO2 for every person on the earth. Soon we will have doubled the amount of CO2. The North Pole will soon be ice free for the first time in 1,000,000 years. If you want the facts about global warming, go to the NOAA website.