BY SARA LEPRO
NEW YORK
In an abrupt change of course, Wachovia Corp. said today it agreed to be acquired by Wells Fargo & Co. in a $15.1 billion all-stock deal, wiping out Wachovia's previous plan to sell its banking operations to rival suitor Citigroup Inc.
A key difference is that the Wachovia deal will be done without government assistance, while the Citigroup deal would have required help from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
"This deal enables us to keep Wachovia intact and preserve the value of an integrated company, without government support," Robert Steel, Wachovia's president and chief executive, said in a statement.
With slightly more than $4 billion of deposits in Hampton Roads, Wachovia held the largest share of bank deposits in the region – almost 22 percent – in mid-2007, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s latest report of deposits by market share. Wachovia has more than 700 employees in Hampton Roads and 48 bank branches.
The Wachovia-Wells deal, announced today, comes in a turbulent time for banks and financial firms as they grapple with the ongoing credit crisis, which led to the recent bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and the failure of Washington Mutual Inc.
Wachovia shareholders will receive 0.1991 shares of Wells Fargo for every share of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia stock they own, valuing Wachovia at about $7 per share. This is a nearly 80 percent premium over the stock's Thursday closing price of $3.91. Shares closed at $10 last Friday, the last trading session before the deal with Citigroup was announced.
The board approved Wells Fargo's offer late Thursday. The deal is still subject to Wachovia shareholder and other regulatory approvals. Wells Fargo said it expects the deal to close by year-end.
"It provides superior value compared to the previous offer to acquire only the banking operations of the company and because Wachovia shareholders will have a meaningful opportunity to participate in the growth and success of a combined Wachovia-Wells Fargo that will be one of the world's great financial services companies," said Wells Fargo Chairman Dick Kovacevich.
San Francisco-based Wells Fargo will record merger and integration charges of about $10 billion, but says it expects earnings to be boosted within the first year after the acquisition closes. No government assistance is part of the deal terms.
Additionally, Wells Fargo plans to issue up to $20 billion of stock, primarily common stock, to maintain a strong capital position.
Charlotte will be the headquarters for the combined company's East Coast retail and commercial and corporate banking business. St. Louis will remain the headquarters of Wachovia Securities.
Additionally, three members of the Wachovia board will join the Wells Fargo board when the transaction is completed.
The combined company will have total deposits of $787 billion and assets of $1.42 trillion, more than doubling Wells Fargo's totals on both counts. The bank will operate more than 10,000 locations. The two banks currently employ a combined 280,000 people.
On Monday, Citigroup agreed to buy Wachovia's banking operations for $2.16 billion in a deal orchestrated by the federal government. That deal, which had been approved by the boards of both companies, was still subject to approval by Wachovia's shareholders and regulators.
It is not clear whether Citigroup will have to pay a break-up fee.
In addition to assuming $53 billion worth of debt, Citigroup had agreed to absorb up to $42 billion of losses from Wachovia's $312 billion loan portfolio. The FDIC agreed to cover any remaining losses in exchange for $12 billion in Citigroup preferred stock and warrants.
But the failure of the government's proposed $700 billion bailout for financial institutions Monday afternoon cast doubt on whether Citigroup would be able to rid itself of some of Wachovia's bad debt.
While the proposal would have prevented most banks from profiting on the sale of troubled assets to the government, an exception would have been made for assets acquired in a merger or buyout.
That would have allowed Citigroup to sell Wachovia's distressed mortgage-related assets to the government for a profit.
A revised version of the bailout plan was passed on Wednesday by the Senate and goes up for a House vote on Friday. The plan still centers on enabling the government to spend billions of dollars to buy bad mortgage-related securities and other devalued assets from troubled financial institutions.
Citigroup has not turned a profit for three straight quarters, and lost a total of $17.4 billion during that period after writing down its assets by about $46 billion. That's the most write-downs of any U.S. bank.
While Wells Fargo has logged three straight quarters of profit declines, the bank has been weathering one of the nation's worst credit crises much better than most of its competitors, in part because it had less exposure to the subprime mortgages whose failure undermined the financial sector.
That means it hasn't been forced to take the huge number of write-downs that other banks have needed. Under Stumpf the bank also has continued raising its dividend at a time when many other financial institutions are slashing theirs to preserve capital.
John G. Stumpf, Wells Fargo president and CEO, took over in June 2007 — near the start of the credit crisis — from Kovacevich, who remains chairman. Both men worked since the 1980s at Norwest Corp., Wells Fargo's predecessor.
Wachovia shares were up $2.25, or 53 percent, at $6.50 in premarket trading, while Wells Fargo fell $1.40, or 3.8 percent, to $35.31. Citigroup shares were down $3.10, or 13.2 percent, to $20.35.
AP Business Writer Jennifer Malloy Zonnas and Virginian-Pilot business writer Tom Shean contributed to this report.






Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

Wells Fargo, or Citigroup???
Wells Fargo, or Citigroup??? Does anybody know what is really going on with this. If I had know 10+ years ago when I opened my account at then Bank of Tidewater, that it would change hands this many times, I would have gone else where.
Bank of Tidewater became Southtrust, with it's lousy customer service and RUDE employees, then it became Wachovia, and now any body can guess????
Best man won
Wells Fargo has been making smart moves over recent years and maintained a great balance sheet. It makes sense they should win out over Citi who needed FDIC assistance to make the deal. The government should always keep out of the way when they're not needed.
Not that it will change anything, but
I agree, Ira. Too bad the congressional sheeple aren't going to allow the normal economic mechanisms to work this out. If they did, a lot of pin-striped pigs would lose their bonuses, and perhaps their jobs. Can't have that happen.
I have a feeling that after Congress passes this give-back to the same people that got us into this mess, we'll still be in the same dung-pit that we're in now, except out another trillion. Nothing like socialism for the rich and connected, to get the stock market moving again. In a few months, Paulson will go back to Goldman Sachs, as a god. Bush will go on the rubber chicken circuit, for $100,000 a pop. Cheney will go back to doing what he does best....leading "Neocons for Perpetual War". And life goes on. At some point, the mirrors will be taken down, and the smoke will clear...and the voters will finally realize what Congress passed today....the end of Democracy, as we know and love it, in America.
proof positive
The market with some time can sort this out on it's own.
Wells Fargo is
Wells Fargo outbid Citi, simple as that. Citi just wanted the retail bank, and Wells Fargo wanted the whole kit and kaboodle and bid accordingly.
Wells Fargo is a great bank, this is a great thing for Wachovia customers.
What the heck!?!?!?!
So who is really buying Wachovia, and what is up with all the switcheroo.