Chesapeake's electronic poll books were voting-delay villains

Posted to: Chesapeake Elections News


CHESAPEAKE

City officials said Wednesday they will investigate problems with electronic poll books that helped cause lines as long as 1,000 people on Election Day.

"Anything that could go wrong did go wrong with the poll books," said Al Spradlin, chairman of the city's electoral board. "I'm disappointed. You don't want anything in your voting system that makes you look deficient. These problems did not make our system look good."

Electronic poll-book problems affected 12 of the city's 53 precincts Tuesday, officials said. Some machines would turn on and then just turn off. Poll workers also had problems hooking them up.

Technicians were able to solve problems early on, but backups, particularly at the Dr. Clarence V. Cuffee Community Center, attracted national attention.

Over 90,000 voter calls went to a national Election Protection Coalition hot line, and of the situations, the one in Chesapeake "was one of the worst" nationwide, said Jon Greenbaum of the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which administered the hot line.

Greenbaum said he got affidavits from voters who said they waited six and seven hours to vote in Chesapeake. Before this year, the city had not relied on electronic poll-books as the primary way of looking up voter information.

"That's not good to use a major election as sort of a guinea pig for the process, particularly with technology," said Greenbaum, director of the Voting Rights Project for the Lawyers' Committee.

Chesapeake's problems came from more than 100 electronic poll-book machines provided by Premier Election Solutions, a company that has 15,000 of th e machines operating across the country. Norfolk, Virginia Beach and Arlington all have them, said company spokesman Chris Riggall, who hadn't heard about similar problems from other localities.

When problems occur, "the cure for that is to reboot it," he said. On Tuesday, rebooting even one machine slowed down voting, Spradlin said.

The city started testing the poll-books around 2006, but depended on paper ones to look up voters, city voting officials said. This year was the first time workers relied on the machines. Paper poll books were supposed to be used as backups.

In previous elections, Chesapeake poll workers had noticed only minor "hiccups" in some of the machines, Spradlin said. "The crashing yesterday was not something we experienced to any extent in the past," he said.

Even though poll workers went through classes on how to use the machines, some may have had problems hooking them up as the polls opened, Spradlin said.

Poll worker training is critical when the machines are being set up, said Riggall of Premier. The company will do a "postmortem exercise" with Chesapeake about problems.

Mike Saewitz, (757) 222-5207, mike.saewitz@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment to alert an editor. Update on new comment functions.

Chesapeake Voting Mess at Greenbrier Middle School

Paper polling rolls WERE the problem. Poll workers manually flipped through two big books of names to find your name and then record it, by pen, in each book. Voter names were not equally divided among only three lines set up for this and one line was mostly empty. Then, even if you handed them your driver's license and voter registration card, they still insisted that you "say and spell" your name and "say" your address. Was this being recorded? No. It just further slow down the process. Why didn't they simply divide the alphabet up into 6 or 8 lines? Computerized rolls-why weren't they trained on how to connect and reboot the computers; why no backups? The actual voting time was not the problem, but they did bring in several more booths. Two hours to vote. Some people left and didn’t vote. They had 4 years to practice, work out the bugs and get it right and efficient. Very sad; very poor planning.

Blame to go all around

True, a major election shouldn't have been the pilot test for this new technology, but at the same time, had all these newly registered voters already been actively involved and registered for previous elections, maybe it wouldn't have gotten that bad, but that's just a hypothesis for now. We'll see what voter turn out in future elections will be like. I'd be interested to know if future local/state elections get the same voter turn out as this presidential election did...

While we have the right to pick and choose which elections we vote, we do yourselves and society a disservice by not being a regular voter. Having said that, don't complain. We contributed to the problem, now we can contribute to the solution...

Hmp

India runs an election where some 650 million people vote. I believe it's done all electronically, and after the last button is pushed the results are there. I believe the results are counted real time. Really, voting machines are a joke software wise. There are tons of people that would (and have) write the software for free and publish it open source for the common good. Being open source it would be peer reviewed for security flaws. What would result is a very secure and good voting platform. The problem with open source is private companies wouldn't make the loads of cash like Diebold has. This is why it hasn't happened. It's amusing and sad that American Idol type stuff can handle huge loads but the national voting system can't. Guess it's a display of gov't inefficiency.

Simple is often better

The simple solution is very often the best solution. How about get rid of the computers and generate printouts for the polling stations?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Elections Stories

More News Stories

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox