The Virginian-Pilot
©
Federal officials announced Wednesday they are moving ahead with plans to sell drilling rights for oil and natural gas off the Virginia coast. If approved after environmental study and public comments, the offshore activity could begin in 2011, led by energy companies that buy government leases.
The decision is a first step toward possible drilling at least 50 miles off the coast on about 2.9 million acres of the Outer Continental Shelf, said Randall Luthi, director of the federal Minerals Management Service, a branch of the U.S. Interior Department.
Under existing rules, Luthi said, Virginia would not directly share in any royalties from an estimated 130 million barrels of oil and 1.4 trillion cubic feet of natural gas that may lie beneath the target area. But he said the local economy would benefit from new jobs and business linked to offshore production and on-shore handling of raw fuels.
"This is an important day," Luthi said during a conference call with reporters.
The intent of the proposed sales, he said, is to encourage more domestic production of oil and gas, decrease reliance on foreign sources and "help bring about our energy independence."
Environmental groups said they oppose the move and vowed to lobby a more Democratic-leaning Congress, along with the incoming Obama administration, to block the sale and leave the Virginia coast closed to drilling.
"It's about choices," said Glen Besa, state director of the Sierra Club. "Do we want to continue making investments in fossil fuels, which would exacerbate global warming? Or do we want to invest in alternative fuels and efficiencies?"
The Navy has expressed concerns about offshore drilling because it might interfere with training exercises and security. NASA and the Wallops Island spaceport on the Eastern Shore, too, have criticized the plans.
One spaceport official jumped onto Wednesday's conference call to complain. "We have serious reservations with this," he said
Chris Isleib, a spokesman for the Department of Defense, released a statement Wednesday that pledged to continue working and negotiating for "a proper balance of our nation's energy and national security goals."
President Bush lifted an executive ban on coastal drilling in July that had been imposed by his father in 1990.
Congress followed suit months later by allowing a two-decade-old moratorium to lapse.
President-elect Obama was opposed to offshore drilling at the start of his campaign. But as gas prices bumped up against $5 a in the summer, the Democrat shifted positions and said drilling should be part of a new, larger energy portfolio focused on American independence.
The Minerals Management Service first proposed exploration and drilling off Virginia two years ago as part of its 2007- 12 leasing program, a move that has drawn interest from as many as 17 energy companies.
Since then, the state has taken center stage in a national debate about renewing offshore production, about energy policy and about protecting the environment.
The debate included political campaign chants of "Drill, baby, drill!"
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine has tried to walk a fine line during the debate, saying he supports exploration of natural gas potential, but not for immediate drilling and not for oil. Also, Kaine has insisted the activity stay 50 miles from shore.
The federal proposal Wednesday respects the 50-mile buffer but would allow both oil and gas drilling, and does not address royalty sharing.
The state will evaluate the proposal, Kaine's secretary of natural resources, Preston Bryant, said, and is especially interested in where the Obama administration takes the issue.
"If they're likely to halt Bush's outgoing regulation change, then this discussion is merely academic," Bryant said.
The announcement Wednesday triggers a 45-day public-comment period and starts an environmental impact study of the proposed Virginia sale.
The government has no immediate plans to press forward with drilling along the coastlines of other states, Luthi said, though he noted that more announcements are expected in early 2009.
Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Speaking of noise
"richardm96179 on Mon, 11/17/2008 at 2:10 pm.
No worries about contradicting yourself. Most of your posts are nonsense. I doubt anyone takes them to be more than background noise."
I'm sure everyone appreciates yours. Don't you think?
No worries about
No worries about contradicting yourself. Most of your posts are nonsense. I doubt anyone takes them to be more than background noise. Contractor was very kind in letting you off of the hook there. I read through them and did not see a single post that actually "contributed" to a conversation on these blogs. If you are going to post 10 times on one thread at least offer something to the group. Go outside and get some sun on your face.
am814330
WOW! The world of modern technology. Whoda thunk! Thanks!
Gertz
If you click on a person's profile name, you are given an option to view every post entered by that profile name. It's a handy tool.
it still puzzles me
It still puzzles me, but mabye I to can be considered for Secretary of State. LOL
What I don't understand is how you were able to find what I posted as far back as 7/5/08. Yeah, I knew I should have stated having lived in Canada a little differently, but I was in a hurry, and running late for an appointment. I need to send Preident elect Obama my resume, so later!
I accept the explanation
After all even Hillary Clinton "remembered" dodging some bullets that weren't actually whizzing around, when she was campaigning against President-Elect Obama in the primaries. And she is now being considered by Obama as our next Secretary of State. Pretty gracious of him, considering.. Even though perjury charges are no threat here, Posting Guidelines does prohibit deceptive messages. They also sometimes remove consecutive posts. Thats probably why the comment with your "good name being at stake" was removed. Just a guess though. BTW Canada is not a state. I'll attribute that to your self-admitted state of confusion. Your good name, in my opinion remains unsullied.
No problem, Gertz, keep up the good postings
It's always fun to read what you post whether I agree with you or not. I like the exchange of ideas and different viewpoints, and you contribute to that all the time. Contractor, I hope this settles this, at least for now!
I love clean beaches and green oceans
If yall want to drill so bad why don't you start by sinking a well in the Elizabeth River since it's already a lost cause to pollution. You won't even have to drill about 2 feet down and you can get all the oily gooey greasy stuff you want and convert you car to run on it. The Elizabeth River is a classic example of an industrialized river that will never be healthy again. So now we have a few people that want Exxon Mobile with their record-breaking profits to take a crack at industrializing our beaches. Jobs for Virginia, what is to keep them from outsourcing them to another state or maybe another country? What's to keep them from selling our oil to the highest bidding country? These oil companies aren’t capitalist, they are greedy, evil bad corporate citizens who care more about their profits than they do about people like you or me.
thank you
"Gertz Point on Sat, 07/05/2008 at 5:19 pm.
(I chose to move to Virginia for many reasons, putting up with whackjob America haters was not one of them.)
Just moved here myself, and I don't see anymore wacko haters here than anywhere else, but I do have a question. So is being an American hater simply anyone who speakes against the most unpopular president in history?"
I'm sorry to say I have no idea why I wrote it that way, or what I must have been thinking at that time. The only thing I can think of is I had just purchased a new home, but again, I simply don't know, but to sit the record straight I'm from VA, born in Yorktown, in the 60's and 70's I did live in a couple of states including Canada and have lived in 5 cities in VA. All I can say is thanks for providing the link, but I am confused.
Will the real Gertz please stand up?
ContractorVA is right on the mark. Here's a link to the story where Gertz claims he just moved to Virginia in the post that Contractor copied below:
http://hamptonroads.com/2008/07/bush-presides-over-citizenship-ceremony-hecklers-removed#comment-627694
So which is it, Gertz? In either case, one of your posts appears to be "inaccurate" at best.