Former deputy loses suit over firing by Portsmouth Sheriff

Posted to: News Portsmouth

NORFOLK

A fired deputy lost her lawsuit against Portsmouth Sheriff Bill Watson on Thursday, with a federal court jury deciding that she didn't prove that her dismissal was in retaliation for naming the sheriff in an earlier lawsuit.

The decision after two days of testimony and 83 minutes of deliberation angered the former deputy, Kerrie Briggs, who rebuffed an approach by Watson in the courtroom.

"I have nothing to say to you," Briggs told Watson, whose lawyer pulled him away.

"I wish her the best; I really do," Watson said later. "I wanted to shake her hand, but she was too upset."

Briggs, 31 and a single mother, had received a settlement in August 2007 in a previous sexual-

harassment lawsuit against Watson's predecessor, Gary Waters. Watson had supported Briggs' claim and, when he became sheriff in 2006, he rehired her. But she added his name to her lawsuit in his official capacity as office holder before the settlement was finalized.

Watson told The Virginian-Pilot in October 2006 that that move "would cost her her job." After the settlement was signed in August 2007, he transferred Briggs from serving papers during the day to jail duty, which involved night shifts that created child-care problems for her. She said that other deputies warned her that the sheriff was out to get her; she suffered anxiety-related health problems, and she was fired in January. She subsequently sued Watson, claiming that the transfer and the firing were retaliatory, thereby violating civil-rights law, and seeking $1.15 million in damages.

But a string of deputies testified that they either didn't say anything to Briggs, or passed along "rumors" without hearing the sheriff threaten anything firsthand.

Lt. Lee Cherry, commander of the sheriff's Community Enforcement Unit, said he called Briggs a "greedy bitch" during an informal breakfast gathering in a restaurant, a comment her lawsuit attributed to Watson.

The transfer, Watson's witnesses said, was to fulfill part of the settlement that called for Briggs to move to a job not funded in part by grants, so the potential pay would be higher. The jail job was the first to come open, they said.

Watson also rolled out testimony that Briggs falsified a jail log - a fireable offense by itself - allowed an inmate to make an after-hours call, and failed to properly report a criminal summons she received in a child-support case involving the father of her daughter. Briggs said that sometimes guards filled in the log before performing an action, such as disabling inmate phones at 10 p.m., and it was "possible" that she could get distracted and not do what she wrote down. She testified that it didn't happen that night, and that she didn't remember an inmate making such a call.

"The plaintiff didn't have the preponderance of the evidence to support her case" of retaliation, said juror Steven Broudy, a Virginia Beach pharmacist.

"Justice was not done," Briggs said outside the courtroom.

The termination effectively ended her law-enforcement career, she said. She's taking college classes, and working in a doctor's office.

Matthew Bowers, (757) 222-3893, matthew.bowers@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Wild BIlly Rides Again

Thanks for giving Briggs her job back so she could drag the citizens through the economic mud of defending another law suit. What was that? The 'Good ole Boy' system is gone. It's right there sheriff, in your back yard.

Don"t Bad Mouth The Portsmouth PD and Sheriff's Dept

over this incident, it happens in every where. I support our Police and Sherriff's Dept. Bill Watson has done some wonderful things for Portsmouth, it was time we had new officials downtown, now if only we could get rid of a few more of the old ones we mite be okay.

“What goes around, comes around”

I read in a somewhat questionable comment “What goes around, comes around”. If this is a fact, you should be worried, because it will knock on your door. See that comment was not only malicious, but also made by someone who obviously has no inside information, other that what Ms. Briggs told him. I am a Deputy that worked with Ms. Briggs for several years and during both trails. Ms. Briggs did a lot of talking in those years and stirred up a lot of controversy and rumors. I truly believe that Ms. Briggs looked for someone else to blame, anyone but herself and another big payday. Her witnesses could only testify to hearsay and received their information from Ms. Briggs. All the Deputies that were there on behalf of Sheriff Watson (including all those white shirts) could testify on Departmental Policies, Pay, Leave, Facts, and Administrative issues. There is so much more to this story, not in favor of Kerrie. Let me just say this! No employee of the Portsmouth Sheriff’s Office committed perjury for Sheriff Watson. We are not afraid of telling the truth as Officers of the Law of the Commonwealth of Virginia. You are challenging our credibility and should be ashamed

She should have never been given a reason for termination.

Here is a tid-bit of information that I don't believe many of you armchair lawyers realize. Any person that works for a Sheriffs Office (not department) work at the "Pleasure of the Sheriff". As unfair as that might sound to some of you that is the nature of the beast. The Sheriff can hire,fire, or promote anyone he wants. He does not need to give you a reason or explanation when he decides you are no longer necessary. I find it hard to believe that this Deputy didn't know this. She lost her job with one Sheriff, a new one takes her back(I'm sure he is asking himself why) and she trys to bite the hand that feed's her. Now bassed on most comments posted here everybody is wrong or lying except her? RrrIGHTttt!

Too bad....

....the jury couldn't see through the smoke screen blown around by Watson and the upper level deputies he brought in to testify. I haven't seen that many whiteshirts in one place in a long time. It's unfortunate that they have to lie for him or else they'd end up in the same predictament Miss Briggs did. The funny thing is that most of them weren't even around when the "alleged" violations occurred. It's too bad there isn't a chance of any perjury charges being filed against these people, especially Cherry. Oh well, what goes around comes around. Watson will be up for election soon and after all the shenaningans he's pulled in his short time in office it's gonna be no surprise to see him headed out the door- a victim of his own stupidity.

I cannot imagine

A cop being retaliatory? I don't believe it! Really though, exactly what sort of response did she think he would have. Did she think this would help her career? I mean, if you are gonna file a sexual harassment suit against your boss, you've got to think it's gonna make it hard to get a promotion. Right? Then what would a reasonable person think would happen if you add your new boss's name (the one who just rehired you) to that lawsuit? A sexual harassment suit is a double edged sword. You can sue someone for -saying- they want to touch you but afterward -nobody- will want to touch you with a ten foot pole. Fair or not, in the real world, you have to know that going in.

Justice was done

While I wasn’t at the trial, I have to wonder about Briggs. The article states that Briggs received a settlement in 2007 from a previous sexual-harassment lawsuit against Watson's predecessor, Gary Waters. Watson backed Briggs' claim, but Briggs added Watson’s name to her new AFTER he took over from Waters. Huh??

Sounds like Briggs spent her previous settlement and figured it was a sure thing to file another lawsuit against the same institution. Keep in mind the previous settlement was just that – a settlement. There was no admission of guilt by Waters or the city. More than likely the city settled as it would be cheaper than dragging it through courts and appeals.

Briggs was justly fired. Period.

Watson's stupid move!!

And, how much did this bonehead move by Watson cost the Citizens of Portsmouth? I guess, maybe the $1500 x ? he saved this year by buying white cars as opposed to brown cars paid for his miserable lapse in judgement by rehiring a known problem employee. What do trials cost these days? Probably another $100,000!!

Welcome to Portsmouth.

Isn't this just more "business as usual" for P-town? It's been a place of corruption, controversy, cover-up, complacency and crime for decades. It will continue to be. The police are out to get the sheriffs, the sheriffs are out to get the police, both are out to get the city maintenance and other city departments. Pity, it could be a nice place to live but for all the problems from the mayors office down.

What should she have

What should she have expected from a police department and sheriff department as corrupt as it is in Portsmouth???

Did she really expect anything less???

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features