Granby Tower should refund deposits, Norfolk leaders say

Posted to: News Norfolk Real Estate News

NORFOLK

In a sign that they have given up on a major downtown project, a majority of the City Council says it's time for developer Buddy Gadams to return tens of millions of dollars to those who reserved condominiums at Granby Tower.

"In light of this economy, I would certainly think it's time to refund the deposits," Councilman Barclay C. Winn said. "It's not really city business. This is a private development. But I personally think it's time to let these people move on."

Work halted nearly 14 months ago on Granby Tower when Gadams lost his financing. The $180 million development would have been downtown's tallest building. It was to include more than 300 condominiums and retail and office space.

Before Turner Construction began work on the project in June 2007, Gadams said that he had deposits for about 40 percent of the condos. Construction ceased on Sept. 18, 2007, after he lost his financing.

City officials said Gadams has worked hard in the past year to find new loans for the project. But as housing prices have fallen, the economy has worsened and obtaining financing has become more difficult, city officials have begun to doubt that the project can be saved.

"The way financing has tightened up, I don't see how this project can go forward," Councilman W. Randy Wright said.

"I'm sure Buddy has lost millions of dollars, but those deposits need to be returned to those people."

Wright acknowledges that Gadams has no legal obligation to listen to council members. "But if he wants to do anything in the city in the future, he needs to keep faith with the council," Wright said.

Gadams responded to a phone call with an e-mail saying he and his fellow investors "remain committed to building Granby Tower."

"We are confident that one of the investor/lenders we are working with will close our deal soon," he wrote. "Granby Tower is a very viable project even in a tough global credit market."

Mayor Paul Fraim said several deposit holders have written him to ask for his help in getting their money back. Some paid their deposits more than three years ago.

So far, Fraim has not intervened.

Gadams' company, Marathon Development, has been telling deposit holders that they have binding contracts and that the project eventually will be built.

At least four deposit holders have taken their refund requests to court. Two lawsuits, filed by Pieter Reidy of Virginia Beach and Jon and Jennifer Crockford of Norfolk, were settled out of court. No terms were disclosed.

A third was filed during the summer by Paul, Barbara and Peter Walker of Norfolk. Their attorney, Chester Smith of Virginia Beach, did not return phone calls.

Judy B. Newsome recently filed suit in Norfolk Circuit Court against Granby Tower, seeking the return of her $33,890 deposit for a $338,900 condominium. Her attorney, Richard Shurtz of Virginia Beach, could not be reached for comment.

However, Shurtz submitted a letter to the court from R. Craig Burns, a vice president in Gadams' development company, in which Burns wrote: "Please note that the purchase agreement executed by Ms. Newsome is a binding contract which the seller will vigorously defend if necessary."

Steven Carter, a naval officer from Annapolis who put $70,000 down for a condo now says he wants the deposit returned but doesn't want to hire an attorney to get it. But without that money, he says, he is unable to purchase another home.

Given the drop in condominium prices, Carter says he is not sure he wants a condo in Granby Tower at the price he agreed to.

Vice Mayor Anthony L. Burfoot said many deposit holders would probably buy in other downtown locations if Gadams released them from their contracts.

"I think a lot of them would look at Harbor Heights," he said of a downtown Norfolk high-rise development in which New York Mets star David Wright owns a condo. "We have other units vacant down there. This would help fill them."

Fraim points out that Granby Tower is a private development that to date has not received any city subsidy, adding, "There will come a moment, and I'm not sure when that will be, when we will try to make sure everyone is made whole, in the event this project doesn't come together."

Councilmen Don Williams and Paul R. Riddick cautioned against too much pressure from the city.

"I don't believe we should tell Buddy how to run his business," Riddick said. "Sometimes I believe government is too intrusive."

Williams agreed but added: "I think the city should express to the developer our unhappiness on his actions regarding the deposits."

Burfoot said, regardless, the city needs to press Gadams to begin clearing up the Granby Tower site. Located at Granby Street and Brambleton Avenue, it has two large holes filled with water.

"The reality is, he shouldn't reasonably expect to have that hole in the ground for the next two years," he said. "That's just not acceptable."

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Light Rail was supposed to cause all the funding ever needed!

Gee, Norfolk low balled its tiny 7.4 mile light rail TOD project and conned the Federal New Starts Program into handing over millions to build Light Rail. The advocates of this massive taxpayer funded transit boondoggle promised that the taxpayers would be paid back by new taxes collected from all the TOD (Transit Oriented Development) that would appear as investors lined up to fund a wealth of new mixed use, tallrise, urban redevelopment. Um .... what happened? You mean that sales pitch wasn't true? Imagine that. You mean slick talking sales people promised more than they could deliver?

Please let go of this hole -

Please let go of this hole - anything but another taxpayer-funded or subsidized building, which, no doubt, will be city-diversity-staffed, with mediocre output, and certainly another impetus for future tax increases. Public beware - speak anything too close to the truth, and the Pilot will censure your comments!

Its ater under the bridge but intention were not on the up & up

Despite the crisis in real estate if anyone cares to relive history this project was a scam from the get go. Gaddams, the mayor, and a few of the old guard families are to blame. The attempts to defraud the federal government and then the public will go with out rebuke or punishment. WHite collar criminals get away with murder

"It's not really city business. This is a private development."

However, you did his bidding. The Hipocracy is daunting

Heh

I went to the showroom once with friends. I bit my lip and didn't get into it (bubble schooling the sales people). I noticed they required that I signed a card that had a legal disclaimer that anything the sales people say may not be true. It said the sales people aren't the builder and nothing they say represents them or some nonsense. I love how in America all these people try to claim zero responsibility for anything, yet they expect you to pay them. I'm seeing this more and more with businesses. I would *NEVER* pay anyone money under these terms. I posted about it on here a few years ago.

Hmm.

I was #17 to view and sign on the dotted line. Yep, I was in this at the very beginning. But as the weeks passed after that initial preview gala, I got a case of cold feet. Gut instinct, I guess. The Garrison marketing/brokerage firm was really slick and professional, but they were unable or unwilling to answer some of my more pressing, probative questions relative to financing and construction timetables. The more I persisted, the more double-talk I received in return. So, after having handed over "only" the initial downpayment of 20K of my 60K deposit (and right before I would have been required to make another 20K installment), I asked for my money back. Repeatedly. The broker tried to stall, even set me up with a meeting with the head broker. Of course, I remained undeterred having already sized up this giant, rotten egg. Finally, after about 1 month of repeated inquiries, Garrison relented and refunded my partial deposit. Well, it took them about 30 additional days to send the funds, haha! But the most laughable thing about the whole thing was that when I came into the office to sign the papers to cancel the agreement, the broker tersely asked that I return the little tote bag

Thanks JCMVB

Thank you for setting me straight. Your statement that the condo docs were already drawn up makes this whole thing even stranger. How does one get legally binding documents drawn up on a development that has no financing? If the money is in the hands of a third party them good ole "Buddy" needs to do what is right. His name will be mud around here for a long, long time.

a monument should be built

A monument should be built on the Grandy Tower plot and be called the worst idea the City of Norfolk had. It could be a minature version of Granby Tower, but at least 10 stories tall.

Marathon messed up our condo, too

I live in the same building as Jack Quinns. Marathon re-developed the property.

When I bought it 3 years ago, my 555 sq. ft condo had CAM fees of $83 per month. Marathon GROSSLY underestimated the cost to run the building and now I am paying $143 dollars a month with the potential to go up to $180+ per.

If they can mess up a 12-unit, 6-story building, how bereft of problems will the 30 story building be?

Granby Towers

It would not surprise me that what was suppose to cost $180 million dollars to build has escalated to $250 million or more to construct now. I doubt seriously if the project will ever get built. Fill the hole in and forget it. The lot might be a good location for a new downtown library.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    Real Estate News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features