The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
The city has 81 active neighborhood improvement plans, the oldest dating from 1957, but many of the plans overlap each other and have conflicting goals.
Some have not been revised in decades.
City Manager Regina V.K. Williams said it is unrealistic to fund all of the plans, which generally call for the city to tear down blighted housing, rebuild infrastructure and, in some cases, create new shopping and business hubs.
She said it's time for the City Council to either eliminate or reaffirm its commitment to the plans.
"Our residents are beginning to express dissatisfaction," she said. "When plans are established, our residents have expectations that they will be implemented."
The council agreed and will begin culling plans in January at two special, three-hour morning meetings.
What seems certain is that major neighborhood initiatives in Wards Corner, Broad Creek, Southside and Fairmount Park will survive.
City Planning Director Frank Duke said the fate of 19 plans must be decided by the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority's board of commissioners. That leaves 62 in the hands of the City Council.
It was Frank who discovered the large number of plans while updating the city's general plan.
Most plans are concentrated downtown, in low-income neighborhoods in the southern and central part of the city and Ocean View.
In addition to the Southside plan, there are five others for Berkley, Campostella and Campostella Heights.
Vice Mayor Anthony L. Burfoot said one plan calls for shipyards and other industry along the waterfront to be redeveloped into park space in Berkley, a goal he calls unrealistic.
"We don't have the dollars to do that, even if we wanted to," he said.
Edgewater, a portion of Larchmont, one of the city's more affluent neighborhoods, has a plan, as does Ghent.
At least four are in various stages of development and have not yet been adopted by the City Council - a remake of the downtown plan, the St. Paul's quadrant, Five Points-Fairmount Park commercial market study and the Central Hampton Boulevard plan.
Council members say deciding which plans to cut could be testy. Seven of the eight council members - Mayor Paul Fraim is the only exception - represent wards, and council members are often protective of their turf.
"There's going to be a lot of give and take," Councilman W. Randy Wright said.
Councilman Barclay C. Winn agreed, saying he expects some "frank discussion."
That already occurred when the council discussed the issue on Tuesday. Councilwoman Daun S. Hester asked to add a funding plan for Park Place, Lamberts Point, Kensington and Villa Heights neighborhoods before beginning the process of eliminating the other plans.
She received support from Councilwoman Theresa Whibley and criticism from most other council members.
Hester told Fraim that he agreed last spring to include funding for the plan in the budget. Fraim said he didn't recall that conversation, "but if you do, then I must have said it."
Hester said she was chagrined to learn the money was not in the budget and asked that it be funded now.
A majority of council told her she will have to wait until the existing list is trimmed.
"The city manager is telling us that things are out of control now," Winn said. "We should pare this down to a reasonable number before we take on anything else."
Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


eliminate or reaffirm???
Are those really the only two options our leaders see? The point of having a plan is to have a goal and then break it down into the smaller steps necessary to accomplish that goal. We don't eliminate a plan because the money is not there for all 81 plans. Set priorities! Is now really the time for the city to take on large commercial projects while the demand for that space is dropping. With the economy as it is, focus on the infastructure. Leave the wish lists for the next housing boom. Until then, fix our problem streets, sidewalks and bridges and target the crime issues across the city. This is not an all or nothing issue. Set timelines, take on- only what you can afford. Give Norfolk the leadership that it's citizens begging for.
CITY OR PRIVATE
Lets look at our recent past. Every project that the city approves and funds falls through, is delayed, is over budget, or an empty promise. The only progress that we have seen in this area comes from private buisness. The Dominion Tower went up and looks great. Look at the cities backing of the Granby Tower. Boone did what she could for Ocean View in a short time and the City is still planning for the past thirty years. The only money that is made is in completed projects for private developers. The city makes money off of funding projects that do not happen and the tax payers suffer. I say sell the 240 properties that the city owns to developers, use that money to get projects done instead of procastinating until you can cut it and pocket the funds already approved for the projects, and turn their seats over to people that act not collect.
Dissatisfied???
I have news for Regina Williams we are NOT beginning to express our dissatisfaction, we HAVE been expressing it only to fall on deaf ears evidently.The Wards Corner Coalition has been screaming for years for our plan to be implemented...I guess the only people listening are the ones IN the coalition group. Finally the sleeping giant in city hall has heard our rumblings, now do you think yall can get it in gear and finish our comprehensive plan? Remember the city paid good money for that plan to be drawn up, let's not waste any more taxpayer money. Also a little reminder for City Hall...just for a change of pace, you may want to actually listen to what the taxpayers are saying instead of trying to read our lips!
Broken Promises
The light of their actions are about to become known to a great many individuals. Only the groups with access to monies, or are able to produce crowds are going to be able to stave off the ax cutting that is about to happen. Regina Williams, the mayor and council are about to show what they are really about. It is very tough to tell if the council is running the city manager or if it is the other way around. Any way, round up your monies, motivate your neighbors and fight this reduction in services from a city that has such high property taxes. Also, have you noticed that they are doing this so quickly after an election cycle? It gives them plenty of time to hope that you will forget what they have done before the next election. Think, and vote accordingly.
also....
citizens please take notice that "Larchmont ans Ghent"..."already have plans in place"...this figures!!!...what about YOUR HOOD?...and now the Mayor is having memorey problems???...we need to ask questions!...don't take this lightly...especially if you live in Wards Corner, Fairmont Park ,and the blighted areas of OV!...just look at Park Place, a perfect example of "back burner" politics...50 years for redevelopment???...downtown was done three times during that time period!!!
So...If...
It was Frank who discovered the large number of plans while updating the city's general plan...who has been in charge of the city's "general plan"?...I've been blogging this mess for years now...who has been at the helm of this mess and why has it been going on for so long?...looks like someone finally has pulled the carpet back and found what was swept under it!!!...and OMG!!!...there is no more room on the back burner!!!...citizens...we need to sell off our old baggage!!!...and speaking of old baggage...what about starting with City Council???