Hampton Roads, VA - 03/18/2010
Broken Clouds47°Broken Clouds
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Study recommends a leaner SPSA, a new regional landfill

Posted to: Environment News


CHESAPEAKE

With SPSA in debt and facing new deficits and rate hikes, and with its mandate due to expire in 2018, leaders across South Hampton Roads are asking: What should the region do about its trash and recycling in the future?

On Wednesday, a major study was released that recommends several dramatic - and expensive - steps forward, including a greater role for private waste companies and a leaner Southeastern Public Service Authority.

Highlights of the study include: development of a new regional landfill, which would cost hundreds of millions of dollars; a change in how residents and businesses pay for garbage disposal; construction of a new composting and yard-waste center; and a permanent program to recycle used computers, TVs and other junk electronics, also known as "e-waste."

Conducted by SCS Engineers, a Norfolk consulting firm, the $248,000 study implores regional leaders to make up their minds - and fast - about whether to stick with a public waste authority, switch to the private sector, or fashion some kind of hybrid.

Robert Gardner, a senior vice president with the consulting firm, told a packed meeting room in Chesapeake that expediency is key. He noted that existing facilities are filling up with trash and in need of costly repairs, and that it would take at least 10 years to develop, finance and construct a new regional landfill.

The current landfill, in Suffolk, is expected to reach capacity by 2018, assuming a new storage cell can be built. The other public landfill, in Virginia Beach, could last four or five years after that, according to the study.

Bucky Taylor, SPSA's executive director since August, said the conclusions support what he has been arguing for months - that despite the authority's myriad problems, regional cooperation among local governments "is still in the best interest of our citizens and customers."

Taylor said the study, along with a highly critical state audit of SPSA's past practices and management, will be the focus of an executive retreat next month, when several "big-picture decisions" will be hashed out.

Others saw things differently.

State Del. John Cosgrove, a Chesapeake Republican and fierce critic of SPSA, said the study failed to assess the possible privatization of the entire waste system - an option he would like to see explored.

At least one company, ReEnergy Holdings LLC, based in New York, has offered a takeover of SPSA and its assets. SPSA's board of directors rejected the bid over the summer, but without public input or a public vote.

The study comes as SPSA is emerging from one of its bleakest periods in a 30-year history as a regional government experiment.

The agency owes more than $240 million and needs to borrow millions more. It was pilloried by state auditors last month as mismanaged and financially adrift for years. Several top officials recently have quit or taken early retirements as controversies mounted.

And now, new agency executives must decide whether to sell a key asset - the waste-to-energy incinerator in Portsmouth, which burns about half of all local trash - to private bidders. The money would help settle old debts but would dramatically shift how SPSA operates.

T his week, Taylor sent letters to city managers and county administrators saying that SPSA faces a $6.4 million budget shortfall and might have to raise disposal rates again - from the current $104 per ton of garbage to as much as $135 per ton.

If approved, those rates would rank as some of the highest in the nation. Local residents paid $57 per ton just two years ago.

The study suggests a different fee system altogether, intended to flatten out rates between commercial and residential customers. The new system, described as "a waste generator fee," would charge people more money for throwing away more trash and thus would encourage recycling.

More generally, the study recommends a future network that includes a smaller, more administrative SPSA and the private sector handling more day-to-day services. The model is similar to how wastes are managed on the Peninsula and in the Richmond area.

It does not presume a specific course of action, however. In urging a new landfill, for example, the study notes that the project could be developed by SPSA alone with public money, in conjunction with private partners and private funds, or under a service contract with a private company.

The long practice of granting free disposal to the city or county that hosts a landfill should end, the study recommends. Instead, hosts would receive a straight fee, a yearly bonus, but also pay the same rate as other communities.

SPSA also should find a centrally located site and construct a new facility to recycle yard waste and create compost, the study concludes. The agency was forced to close such a facility last year in Virginia Beach because neighbors complained of foul odors and feeling sick.

Since then, bags of yard wastes have mostly been dumped in the landfill, taking up valuable space, according to the study.

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Ok, got that. Then what?

Ok, got that. Then what?

SPSA would be better off. Recognize the ship is sinking and needs a new “crew” to get it seaworthy again. Hire a private firm that will have a vested interest operating the organization efficiently.

Then What?

Ok, got that. Then what?

Fired

The entire board should be fired. They have run this organization into the ground and make a lot of excuses for why they are such a failure.

One other correction

One other correction. The SPSA board of directors did not reject a proposed purchase of SPSA's assets made by a private firm. The board simply declined to take up this proposal at the time. The board had just received four proposals under the PPEA act and the focus of the board has been on the evalutation of these proposals. The board has narrowed this list to two proposals and negotiations under the act are underway with these two firms.

Value of the Assets

The study does document that the assets owned by SPSA have great value; no wonder others would want to buy them. However, those offers have to be considered in the context of ensuring we have a competitive environment for disposal or one firm could jack up the rates which municipal and customers would have to pay. The sale of the RDF/WTE plant would not dramatically change the way SPSA operates, and perhaps the sale of this asset to one disposal company, and the sale of other disposal assets to another company, would provide significant debt reduction for SPSA while maintaining a competitive market place that keeps disposal prices reasonable. Private ownership and operation of disposal assets certainly has a place in our system if it can be integrated without creating a monopoly for one service provider. Mr. Cosgrove's comments are particularly interesting; who does he represent in this issue? Is he speaking for the City of Chesapeake? For the Legislature? For a private company?

Don't think that would work well

I don't think breaking it down to the municipality level would work well. Disposal is a big job that requires expensive facilities. It's much cheaper to build large facilities rather than a bunch of small ones.

I think we just need a better run SPSA with more attention toward providing services. Have you ever tried to get rid of hazardous materials like old gasoline, electronics, or fluorescent bulbs? It's quite a job to figure out what to do with them and then it's usually something like there with be a drop off 15 miles away a month from next Tuesday.

SPSA

"SPSA's board of directors rejected the bid over the summer, but without public input or a public vote." Therein lies the biggest problem with SPSA....it answers to no one and no one asks questions. The management is inept and should not be managing a goat herd, because they are not qualified to manage a goat herd. These authorities are an autonomous, lawless and incompetent (LOOK AT THE RECORDS). No local government cares because they don't want to be responsible for this mess. And Virginia Beach city council wants a housing and redevelopment authority???? JOKE!

How about-

every municipality take care of their own trash and garbage?

Ya’ll generated and didn’t recycle or minimize your waste. Ya'll put those aluminum beer and soda cans in the blue bins vice save them and sell tnem back for yourselves.
Ya'll spent God knows how much on bottled water, etc. Ergo, figure it out for yourselves and don’t expect VB SPSA to take care of your waste for you.
Get smart, and do it right quick.

No new news here for $248,000.

No new news here for $248,000. Another waste of money. Blame each locality that appoints their representatives to SPSA’s Board. SPSA continues to waste money. We will be probably told by SPSA they are underfunded, however, the truth is SPSA has been mismanaged for years. Current and past Directors are to blame. Dissolve this organization ASAP.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Environment Stories

More News Stories

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox