69°
forecast

Activists pledge 'all-out war' to block power plant

Posted to: Environment Virginia

Environmentalists are vowing to block a proposed $6 billion coal-fired power plant in Surry County, saying it would increase air pollution, would contribute to global warming and is not needed.

Advocacy groups including the Sierra Club, Southern Environmental Law Center and Chesapeake Climate Action Network are gearing up for what one activist called "all-out war" in response to plans announced this week by the project sponsor, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative.

ODEC, a nonprofit utility based in Richmond, said it wants to build the plant on about 1,600 acres in the town of Dendron, about 40 miles west of Norfolk, in order to meet anticipated demand for electricity in the near future in Virginia, Maryland and Delaware.

The utility has given the plant a name - Cypress Creek Power Station - and said it would burn mostly Appalachian coal to produce 750 megawatts to 1,500 megawatts of electricity, enough to power about 400,000 homes. Woody timber wastes, known as biomass, would fuel about 3 percent of the plant.

In comparison, the coal-fired plant under construction in Wise County in Southwest Virginia is expected to produce 585 megawatts and cost about $1.8 billion. That project, led by Dominion Virginia Power, is being challenged in court by environmentalists.

"In the face of an economic recession and mounting threats from climate change, the prospect of introducing an unnecessary $6 billion coal plant is outrageous," said Tom Cormons, a lawyer and campaign coordinator for Appalachian Voices, a group fighting the Wise County plant as well.

Jeb Hockman, an ODEC spokesman, said the utility expects opposition from environmentalists and understands their concerns, but he stressed that the plant would be built with sophisticated controls to greatly curb emissions such as mercury, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, which causes smog.

"We're not against any of these groups," Hockman said. "We're willing to listen to them, work with them, to make a better project."

Carbon emissions linked to global warming would be captured and stored underground once such technology is developed, he said. Officials estimate the technology, known as carbon sequestration, will not be ready commercially until at least 2020.

ODEC announced its plans the same week that the Governor's Commission on Climate Change made final more than 100 recommendations for combat ing global warming in Virginia. Chief among them is reducing greenhouse gases - most notably carbon dioxide - by 80 percent by 2050.

The commission chairman, L. Preston Bryant, who also is Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's secretary of natural resources, said he knew little about the ODEC plant and that its projected emissions were not part of the panel's calculations.

Noting that coal will continue to be an energy source in Virginia and the rest of the world for decades to come, Bryant said, "We very much want coal to be an increasingly smaller and cleaner part of our energy supply.

"I personally look forward to hearing what advanced technologies are being proposed for this plant," he added.

Hockman said ODEC's board of directors has not yet decided yet to build the plant, which is estimated to cost

$3 billion to $4 billion but could go as high as $6 billion.

The board selected Surry County as its preferred site after reviewing other locations throughout the mid-Atlantic. The utility also is interested in a site in neighboring Sussex County and will continue to consider it as a Plan B option, he said.

It could take four to six years to build the plant, providing up to 2,200 jobs, Hockman said. ODEC hopes to start operations by 2016, with between 150 and 200 employees running the station.

Hockman said the utility has sent letters to all residents of Dendron inviting them to an informational meeting from 5:30 to 8 p.m. Thursday at the local high school. The meeting is open to the public.

ODEC has not applied for permits from the State Corporation Commission or the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, though Hockman said those applications will be delivered soon.

The utility has sat down with state environmental regulators in a "pre-application meeting" to discuss the complex process ahead, said Bill Hayden, a DEQ spokesman.

ODEC generates and transmits wholesale electricity to nearly 1.3 million people in three states. It owns 11.6 percent of the North Anna nuclear power station outside of Richmond and 50 percent of the Clover power station in Halifax County in Southside Virginia.

Before choosing coal for the Surry location, Hockman said, the utility also considered its own nuclear facility, as well as one fueled by natural gas. But both options proved too expensive and unwieldy.

"We're like the Saudi Arabia of coal," he said of America's reserves. "It's reliable, consistent, still fairly inexpensive, and we think we can handle it in an environmentally sensitive way."

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

You want facts?

I'm no environmental whacko, but if you want to see some facts go to the HRPDC website and read what they had to say in the past about this area's battle with air quality non-attainment. We have skirted by in past years, but this little project could easily put us in noncompliance with the EPA's ozone limit. While you are at it, you might want to find out where all the fly ash is going to be deposited. One Superfund golf course in the area should be enough, don't you think? Finally let's see how supportive you are for this project when you are paying hefty taxes and fees, submitting to legal prohibitions on your own property, and having semi-annual environmental inspections on your vehicles because of a single summer's worth of temperature inversions. I don't care if they build this plant, but there better be a truthful environmental review that addresses the impact on the entire region. It's not NIMBY, it's due dilligence to assure the public.

What's worse?

We live in an area without a lot of options as far as power goes. We have the option of nuclear or coal. Neither are appealing to me, but I would hate for us to be having "brown outs" either like they did in CA because of the lack of new power plants.

Algae and alternatives

After reading the comments the opponents to the power plant seem to fail to understand simple science and economics. For instance algae requires CO2 to grow so if we keep sequestering CO2 instead of producing it algae and in fact all plant life will suffer. Talk about seeding the seeds of our own destruction. And Oil, Coal and other "traditional" energy industries do not get special tax breaks - they get standard business deductions for the money spent as a part of the doing business and pay billions in royalties and taxes. Why do you think Alaska sends its citizens royalty checks every year? It is Wind, Solar and so-called alternatives that get the massive tax breaks and subsidies. They would not be able to exist without these government subsidies. And they still cost significantly more to use and can not produce a fraction of the needed energy. Of course the world would love for us to continue to destroy our economy as we have been doing for years with over-taxation, excessive useless regulation and short-sightedness. People need to open their eyes and look around.

Pseudo-Environmentalist and bogus Man-Made climate change

Once again pseudo-environmentalist are opposing an energy project based upon bogus climate change crisis-mongering. Just as man did not cause the little ice-age and climate changes from 1300 to 1850s we have not caused the warming that has occurred since. The climate is not static and is always changing. Want to know what is driving the climate? Look up during the day! And CO2 is not a pollutant - it is critical for plant life and we need more of it. Every time we find a way to eliminate real pollution and not undermine our economy these pseudo-environmentalist turn around a claim the fix is more pollution. Think catalytic converters, hydrocarbons and CO2. The new boggy man is CO2 and "Global Warming" now "Climate Change". We can't let these crisis-mongers deceive us into "trying to fix" something we have no control over (i.e. the climate). We should eliminate and reduce real pollutants and recycle but have to adapt to the natural changes or we face the consequences of the French during the Little-Ice-Age. Look at the real history.

Name calling and twisted logic!

"I'll bet these enviro-fascists who want to tell everyone else to do without coal would be the first to tell me to mind my own business if the topic of abortion or homosexual marriage came up. Funny how we all want to run the show for other people, isn't it?"
Quite the opposite, Mary. Burning coal and the consequences effects everyone, the other two issues are more personal and don't really effect you at all.

Save Power

Instead of building these two new plants now, lets just get the name and Dominion account number of every member of the groups trying to stop the projects. As the power demand increases, Dominion can just shut off service to these people and shift it over to the people that need it. These do gooders can then try and live off of solar or wind power or live without electricity at all.

you know, this whole global

you know, this whole global warming thing is getting a little long in the tooth. Go to Al Gores really big house sucking up so much energy, he could start his own Sun. He needs the new power plant to keep up with his hypocritical crusade to keep his name in the news. These nuts need to go home, kiss their tree good night, and stop standing in the way of progress. God knows what would happen if someone proposed a......gasp......oil refinery to be built. It'd be a real freak show then. Gotta love it....

Terrorists

Sierra Club, Southern Environmental Law Center and Chesapeake Climate Action Network
By claiming they will do anything possible and implying war they have made themselves terror groups who are threatening the infastructure of the US and may have implications on national security due to the possible impact on military bases in HR. ALL of the acting memebers of these groups should be locked up. They aren't helping the environment or stopping the (falsely) alledged "global warming".

Just build a bridge...

and I don't care. I say this because the plant will likely be served by the Norfolk Southern mainline along Route 460. A branch line would be constructed and would have to cross 460 to reach Dendron. With a bridge, no long coal trains blocking the road. Outside of this, I welcome more electricity as long as its not being taxpayer subsidized.

Re: Let's be real

Sooner, you should be thankful that the staff, that is "out of touch with their customer base and struggling for their own existence", actully approved your comments.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners