Hampton Roads, VA - 11/08/2009
Clear55°Clear
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Expert: Norfolk board's secret meeting broke sunshine law

Posted to: News

Why the meeting?
The City Council was briefed on the indictments of three officers – two active, one resigned – including two on felony charges.

NORFOLK

The City Council met for 70 minutes behind closed doors Wednesday night in what one legal expert called an apparent violation of Virginia's Freedom of Information Act.

The council met to discuss a "personnel issue," according to Mayor Paul Fraim. He said the council was briefed on the indictments of three police officers - two active, one recently resigned - this week, including two on felony perjury charges.

A 1998 opinion from the Virginia attorney general's office concluded that city councils may not meet in closed session to discuss personnel over which they have no control.

According to J. Tucker Martin, communications director for Attorney General Bob McDonnell, that ruling was affirmed by the attorney general's office in 2000.

The City Council has no control over hiring and firing police officers. That power is shared by City Manager Regina V.K. Williams and police Chief Bruce P. Marquis.

Norfolk City Attorney Bernard A. Pishko said he disagrees with the ruling, which he added does not have the force of law.

He said the council also met to discuss legal issues that would justify a closed meeting, but he would not disclose the nature of those issues.

Alan Gernhardt, staff attorney for the Freedom of Information Advisory Council in Richmond, said Pishko was correct in asserting that an attorney general's opinion is not law.

"Until there's a court precedent, there is no black-line rule," he said.

But he added: "From a governmental structure, why is the City Council looking into this? Why isn't the police chief taking care of it?"

He said unless the city charter specifically allows the council to regulate police officers, meeting behind doors to discuss the indictments appears to have violated the law.

Pishko said the meeting was "absolutely justified." He said the Freedom of Information Act provides elected officials with some discretion to discuss personnel issues.

"I'm not sure it's sensible to discuss any personnel matters in front of the public and the media," he said. "I know this is something we would not have discussed publicly."

Vice Mayor Anthony L. Burfoot said nothing was discussed by the council that was not aired in public during a news conference held Wednesday by Marquis.

Burfoot said it was important for council to be briefed so that members can react property to inquiries from the media and community leaders.

"You've got guys out there who are divisive in nature, and anytime they can divide the city, they will," he said. "It was important for us to know and to be able to support what the police chief is doing."

Asked whether the meeting should have been held outside of the public eye, Burfoot said, "I could not make that determination."

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

case of secret motives and avoiding of notice to citizen;again

I sure hope the State Attorney general can see the true hidden motives of city government and do something about it. There are too many instances of hidden agenda and as a citizen of Norfolk we can only hope that this time the rule of law presides over the city's elected officials. What the council is afraid of is that further inspection of practice may truly get out in other areas and Pishko is dead set against this further investigation from outside officials. Pishko and attorneys within his office have been using the police to do the bidding of council for some time now and we can only hope that this ceases to be permitted. If the citizens cannot count on it's government to follow the rule of law then who?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More News Stories

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox