Holland Road is not Suffolk's responsibility

Posted to: Editorials Opinion Suffolk

That Suffolk is even considering spending $102.5 million on a federal highway is testament to both Washington's failures and Richmond's bullheadedness. Unfortunately, it's also testament to Suffolk's frustration and a dangerous recklessness with the finances of local taxpayers.

A company called CenterPoint wants to build a gigantic warehouse and distribution center on land it owns along U.S. 58 west of downtown. On that overworked stretch of highway - also called Holland Road - traffic even now snarls with a combination of commuters, shoppers and residents.

Adding CenterPoint's trucks would bring Holland Road to a halt. The company knows that, but the prospect of so many jobs - upward of 2,000 - has already swayed state and regional officials to endorse another project from which they would get all the benefits (income taxes, cargo capacity) and none of the problems (traffic, noise).

For Suffolk officials, the calculus is much more complicated and much more practical. The jobs would be welcome, especially in the current economy. But since the work force is regional, many of those workers are likely to come from - and pay property taxes in - other cities.

In any case, those jobs would come at the cost of turning one of the city's primary east/west corridors into a parking lot. Because there is no money available from Richmond and Washington, goes the city's reasoning, Suffolk has no choice but to fix the highway itself.

According to reporting by Pilot writer Dave Forster, the city is now considering - as part of a draft capital improvements plan - issuing bonds to pay for the improvements.

That would tie up a huge proportion of all the city's capital spending, forcing officials to eliminate or postpone or alter other projects. Most essentially, it would levy a bill of $1,300 on every man, woman and child in Suffolk.

Doing so would be a radical shift in highway funding, and a dangerous one, for both Suffolk and the region. It would ask localities to shoulder a punishing financial burden properly the function of the state and federal governments.

Beyond that, a project this big would skew the city's spending priorities in fundamental ways.

Suffolk's draft capital plan, as reported by Pilot writer Hattie Brown Garrow, calls for combining two rural elementary schools - Southwestern and Robertson - despite the fact that the School Board and parents want to keep them where they are. The reason? Money. It's just cheaper to consolidate the schools.

Such a huge highway project would also distort spending on the local roads for which Sufolk is supposed to be responsible.

Absent the CenterPoint project, there is no way that Suffolk would allocate so much so soon to U.S. 58. Even if $102.5 million magically turned up in city coffers, Holland Road would be an unlikely beneficiary, especially when growth has overwhelmed so many of the city's other roads.

Richmond and Washington's abdication on highway funding is the inevitable result of shortsighted lawmaking. Though Suffolk's own legislators have been leaders on transportation funding, their colleagues have been laggards, in part because they receive the benefits of growth in Hampton Roads without spending money to support it or suffering the consequences.

Suffolk will prove that heartless calculus right if the city decides to spend so much of its local property taxes on a project that shouldn't be its responsibility. Worse, the city will give the state's and the nation's leaders permission to continue their own reckless ways, knowing that local taxpayers can be counted on to pay the price.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

So What's the Alternative?

Your editorial sounds a pessimistic note, as you seem to advocate doing nothing and pinning your hopes and those of the citizens of Suffolk on a disfunctional cabel of politicians in the House of Delegates who have already effectively put this Commonwealth at risk by failing to adequately fund transportation infrastructure. When this majority in the House is willing to abandon bridges and let our infrastructure go unrepaired, there is little chance they will improve the funding to create jobs and prosperity for Suffolk and the region. But what to do? Our voters seem to genuinely believe that we need to invest in infrastructure, but for some reason they seem unwilling to remove the roadblocks that have stopped it for decades. So cities must act to create new mechanisms to reduce their dependency on the Commonwealth that has so badly failed them. I applaud their gumption.

working for a full range of motion

Using a disproportionate amount of the CIP budget to fix Holland Road is unfortunate. Although this is perhaps properly the function of state and federal government, I think modern technology is great. We will have tension between the Treasury Dept. (all about bonds) and the SEC (all about police), with the Federal Reserve (all about fat) for good measure.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   



Toolbox