©
WASHINGTON
More than a year after the fatal shootings of 17 Iraqi civilians, five decorated military veterans who were Blackwater Worldwide security guards are headed to court in a case that strained diplomatic ties and raised the level of anti-Americanism in Baghdad.
Iraqis hope the charges, to be unsealed Monday, finally will bring justice and improve relations with the United States after the gruesome slayings on Sept. 16, 2007.
Defense lawyers say the case unfairly has tarnished the images of the Blackwater guards. Each man has received honors for his service in some of the world's most dangerous places, from Bosnia and Afghanistan to Iraq. The five were to surrender to the FBI on Monday, when the Justice Department plans to unseal the charges against them.
"These are indictments that never should have been brought," said Mark Hulkower, a lawyer for Army veteran Paul Slough of Keller, Texas.
Attorney David Schertler, who represents former Marine Dustin Heard of Knoxville, Tenn., said the guards "were defending themselves and their comrades who were being shot at and receiving fire from Iraqis they believed to be enemy insurgents."
According to their lawyers, the other men charged are: Donald Ball, a former Marine from West Valley City, Utah; Evan Liberty, a former Marine from Rochester, N.H.; and Nick Slatten, a former Army sergeant from Sparta, Tenn.
A sixth suspect was in negotiations to plead guilty to lesser charges in exchange for his cooperation against his former colleagues. Documents related to that matter remain sealed as well.
Iraqis said Saturday they look forward to the trial.
"I think it is a move in the right direction to make the security company employees realize that they are no longer above the law and they should stop behaving like cowboys on the streets of Baghdad," said Mohammed Latif, 52, a retired police officer.
He said he hoped the indictments were not just "an act of propaganda."
Slough, Ball, Heard, Liberty and Slatten have been under investigation since a convoy of heavily armed Blackwater contractors opened fire in Baghdad's Nisoor Square. The dead included young children.
Witnesses say the shooting was unprovoked. Blackwater, hired by the State Department to guard U.S. diplomats, says its guards were responding to a car bombing and were ambushed by insurgents.
The shooting strained relations between the U.S. and Iraq, and provided fodder for anti-American insurgent propaganda videos in Iraq. Top Blackwater officials were ordered to appear at congressional hearings in Washington.
An Iraqi government spokesman, Ali al-Dabbagh, said Baghdad welcomed any attempt to "hold the criminals accountable for their crime." He said the Iraqi government has hired lawyers to seek money for the families of the victims.
The charges come after 14 months of investigative missteps, legal wrangling and fierce debate within the government — and the Justice Department itself.
Among the hurdles the government now faces:
- Whether U.S. law permits civilian contractors to be charged in the U.S. for crimes committed overseas. Prosecutors must convince a judge that the guards can be charged under a law targeting soldiers and military contractors — even though Blackwater works for the State Department.
- Prosecutors are expected to argue that, if not for Blackwater, military personnel would provide diplomatic security. In that way, Blackwater could be seen as supporting the Defense Department's mission.
- Convincing a jury that a drug law intended to crack down on assault weapons should be used to pump up potential penalties against the guards. The five men are expected to be charged with assault or manslaughter under a provision in the 1988 Anti-Drug Abuse Act that requires 30-year prison terms for using machine guns to commit violent crimes, whether drug-related or not.
- Proving that prosecutors did not rely on protected statements the guards gave to State Department investigators within hours of the shooting. The State Department gave limited immunity to all the guards in the four-car convoy, promising not to prosecute them based on the initial statements recounting how the violence began.
Additionally, under its contract with the State Department, Blackwater was allowed to repair and repaint the armored sport utility vehicles involved in the shooting. Also, legal complications resulting from the immunity agreements delayed the FBI investigation for more than two weeks after the shootings.
Taken together, the missteps left national security prosecutors with a crime scene long cold and limited forensic evidence to bolster their case.
Since then, the Justice Department has relied on witnesses to the shootings and relatives of the civilian victims in trying to persuade the grand jury to indict. Several Blackwater guards who were in the convoy were ordered to testify against their colleagues.
Still, U.S. human rights advocates continue to criticize the Justice Department for waiting 14 months to bring charges.
Deborah Colson, interim director of Human Rights First's Law and Security program, said the delay was "a significant contributing factor to fostering a culture of impunity that threatens the safety of Iraqi and Afghan civilians, American military personnel and the contractors themselves."
"Contractors perform necessary and often courageous service, but letting even a few act wi

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Scary comments
Wow, some of the comments make you wonder about people. These contractors are not "protecting" me or fighting for the U.S. They were hired to protect diplomats, not be soldiers. Another point: Blackwater contractors have been in Iraq for several yeares now, if this was an example of what happens all the time, then why have there not been more cases like this? Apparently, most can act according to standards, and respond to incidences appropriatly. I agree that they will have their day in court, and the opportunity to plead their case, so I am not rushing to judgement. But I am not rushing to support them either.
Medals, lots of medals
Timothy McVeigh had a load of military medals including a Bronze Star. Wonder how dangerous the streets of Oklahoma City were at the time?
Maybe they over-reacted
Maybe they over-reacted because they didn't want to be burned, torn apart by the innocent civilians, and hung upside down from a bridge.
Unless these guys were just driving down a peaceful street and lost their minds and started shooting shoppers and passers-by, they need to be acquitted.
Just following Bushes directive
These hired killers were just following president Bushe's directive. "Shoot first, ask questions later." Bush led the way if his "brings em on", and "the ends justify the means" attitude.
US Human Rights Activists
US Human Rights Activists have played a large part in these men being charged.
I would be curious to know if these activists are pro-choice? If so what joke. Okay to take the life of an unborn child but protest when our soldiers kill someone whilst at war.
Some of these comments make me laugh
I love the ones whom sit back in judgement, but some tend to forget how this started. It began when BLACKWATER guards themselves were killed and HUNG FROM A BRIDGE in Iraq.
I am quite sure those responsible for this were bought over, placed on trial and had justice served? Thats a joke.
You condemn these people for going, doing a valiant job, but as long as "we arent dignifed" and someone dies , the Contractors get all the blame. That alone is sad.
We sit here and post comments because soley our men and women fight for us. Did the terrorist ask us or care if they killed innocent people on 9/11 and after? NO.
But the "holier than though" (us) logic is insane to me.
No one caomplained when the people whom were Private Contractors overseas were killed, and hung did they? No , but because someone wants to prove a point now the ones whom are "Demanding justice" get there gratification..
Hope that works for the ones whom slammed these guys, let me know how it works out when we arent free..
thanks to the men and women of our armed forces and those whom are private contractors for making us safe.
The solution is simple
If the Iraqi government isn't satisfied with our protection of them, the solution is simple. Let's just leave, and let the Iraqis go back to killing each other, as they did before our involvement. We have given them enough time to sort out their affairs. The Iraqi government doesn't deserve one more American life or dollar to be wasted while they argue, and go on vacations.
If they are truly honorable people . . .
If these are truly honorable people, they wouldn't be trying to duck and dodge the accusations but face up to them in a forthright manner. They may have done honorable service while in uniform, but that does not and should not make them immune to prosecution of possible crimes since. America sets a bad example by saying our people, even our civilian contractors, are immune to prosecution for criminal acts done in foreign countries. Who would want to deal with such a country that would allow its people to commit crimes in a country - in some cases murder - and get off scot free? It is important to show that America does not tolerate that sort of behavior in any way from anyone.
More scapegoating
This whole thing sounds like more scapegoating by a Justice Department that is afraid to say the simple truths that the terrorists, those want to impose an Islamic Dictatorship like in Iran, Iraqis and other non-coalition foreign national in Iraq have been intentionally killing Iraqis and making it look like Blackwater and coalition personal are doing it. If it wasn't for Syria, Iran, Al-Quada and other anti-freedom terrorists the reconstruction and rebuilding of Iraq after the end of the Iraq War (1990-2003/2004 - Refer to the Korean War history) would have been completed years ago.
We are dealing with similar problems on our Southern Border were smugglers are giving special treatment and immunity to prosecute border agents.
Reply to Gordon and then some
Navy and Marine Corps medals are cheap and meaningless now? Four of the five were in country already since the start of this "war". Nothing else they ever did while they were over there before as servicemen was questionable, however this was. The car bomb that exploded in the square was investigated by Baghdad traffic cops. Would we accept the official report of a Norfolk traffic cop in response to a car bomb being detonated in front of the Federal Building? And that traffic cop's "expert status" on explosives and psychology that the exploding car bomb was no justification of the armed security guard next door shooting people who, during the chaos, tried to enter the building he was in the lobby of? Every global firing war we've ever gotten into has had the "people" from that country claiming we're guilty of war crime. Hitler, Ho Chi Minh and Sadaam did the same things, claiming we were bombing children's hospitals and nunneries and not the exploded bomb factories and ammo dumps that were photographed. It's called propaganda. To demoralize the will of the warrior. When was the last time the Iraqi's put some of their people on trial for the violence waged against American forces?