The Virginian-Pilot
©
They got their man elected president on Nov. 4. But for Pat Okerlund and thousands of other Barack Obama volunteers across the nation, the job is far from finished.
Obama, who built an extraordinary grass-roots organization en route to his historic victory, isn't folding it up now that the election is over. In a still-evolving effort that insiders have dubbed "Obama 2.0," he is remaking his army of campaign volunteers into an ongoing nationwide support group to help him achieve his agenda for change.
Okerlund is one of more than 4,000 Obama volunteers who hosted "Change Is Coming" meetings in their homes and other gathering places the weekend of Dec. 13-14.
Okerlund's was one of the largest. About 50 people jammed a meeting room at the Chesapeake Central Library on Dec. 13. There were about 15 such gatherings, most attracting five to 10 people, around South Hampton Roads.
The idea is to continue capitalizing on the enthusiasm of Obama's grass-roots supporters.
"Everybody's still excited," Okerlund said. "We all worked real hard to get him elected, and we want to continue to help out any way we can."
The Obama campaign provided logistical support for the meetings, using its list of 13 million e-mail addresses to recruit the hosts. They were invited to sign up on the campaign Web site, where details of the meetings were posted.
Hosts were sent a how-to packet, including a DVD, and were invited to listen in on a nationwide conference call with organizers a few days before the meetings.
It's a new kind of political undertaking, one that is taking shape outside the existing party structure. Obama organizers admit to making it up as they go along.
"It's a work in progress, and will be, I think, for the next several years, because this hasn't really been done before," said Marshall Ganz, a Harvard professor and veteran organizer who has been an adviser to the Obama campaign.
The way the campaign built its organization from the ground up, fueled by the power of the Internet, gave it legs that most campaigns in the past have lacked, Ganz said.
"So now there's a bunch of people out there, and they're associating with each other," he said. "And to the extent that they're associating with each other, they're able to become an organized movement."
There were four goals for the meetings:
- Direct two-way communication. Attendees were encouraged to identify the issues of most concern to them, which the hosts relayed back to Obama's Chicago headquarters. Among the issues most frequently cited at the local meetings were the economy, health care, education, the environment, alternative energy and the Iraq war.
- Establishment of a lobbying network. Participants began familiarizing themselves with their congressional representatives so they'll be ready to contact them to urge support for Obama's legislative agenda.
- Electoral organizing. Obama supporters were encouraged to seek out and support like-minded state and local candidates - and even to consider running for office themselves.
- Civic engagement. In perhaps the campaign's most unusual initiative, supporters are being encouraged to become involved in community service projects in their localities.
"President-elect Obama wants us to hold a service event to celebrate his inauguration," Okerlund said. "I think it's really neat, instead of having big parties and balls and dances, that we do something to help people. That's what he's all about."
Okerlund's group decided to target homelessness in Hampton Roads. Participants will put together care packages of scarves, gloves, socks, toiletries and food and pass them out to local homeless people during a nationwide count of the homeless during the last week of January.
Another unique feature of the effort, Ganz said, is that it's a movement of people brought together around shared values rather than any one particular issue.
"People found themselves working with people that they never expected to be working with," he said. "It's a pretty eclectic kind of scene. That's a great strength, because it brought people out of their issue silos."
In many cases, participants in the meetings had never met each other before. Organizers said most gatherings were racially, economically and socially diverse.
Among the nine people who showed up at Staci Walton's home in Suffolk, for instance, were a doctor, a college teacher, an artist, a computer technician, a waitress and a laid-off construction worker.
One woman plans to bring a Republican friend to the next meeting, Walton said, reflecting the Obama campaign's intent to reach across party lines.
"In order to get things to happen, it's very apparent that it can't be Republican or Democrat," Walton said. "If we really want to see health care reform, we have to work together. If we want education reform, we have to work together. It can't be Bush-bashing. It has to be forward-thinking."
The evolving Obama organization is noteworthy for its direct, headquarters-to-grass-roots structure, bypassing the Democratic Party apparatus.
"I think it's a good strategy," said Richard Cranwell, Virginia Democratic chairman. "Look, this country has got to deal with some very, very significant issues, probably more difficult issues than any president has ever faced. Clearly, that's going to require a very ambitious agenda that's going to have to move through Congress."
Does opening up the process to Republicans give him any heartburn?
"Absolutely not," Cranwell said. "It may be a garden for converts, who knows?"
Bill Sizemore, (757) 446-2276, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Who is this man?
After two straight years of talk, I still don't know who this man called Obama is. He appears to be another politician who would rather choke on an acorn than answer a question directly. I have great doubts as to his sincerity, yet I hope and pray I am wrong. The fate of my children and yours rests in the hands of an unproven man from a corrupt state.
No, Fletcher
Not nearly as extreme as the takeaways you wrote.
I would love to see Sarah Palin run in '12, but I didn't say that.
I don't think Obama supporters are arsonists but I think the extremely hateful comments on *both* sides of the presidential race led the creep to think he had a mandate to commit arson. Words matter, and it is much beyond "sticks and stones may break my bones . . ." If God created the world by a word, and I believe He did, then words have an almost holy aspect and should always be measured. That is directed to me, too, as my comms aren't always perfect.
I couldn't tell that you were not strafing all conservatives when I read your initial comments. I now realize you are only going after the extremists.
Discourse
I voted for Obama. My intent was not to start a civil war between the Republicans and the Democrats but to right a wrong.
That wrong was the way that Bush was installed by the Supreme Court with wrongful tactics by some in Florida.
That translated to a second term because Bush decided fear was the only way to keep his ill gotten seat of power.
That said, I know there are some respectable Republicans out there and I reach out to them to give Obama a chance.
To those on the fringes of the right I would ask them to wait and see.
As for now some of us are willing to take the path that leads to change that is needed.
We will do our best to ensure we don't fail to better our country for the future. To those who are on the fringes of the left I would ask them to consider moderating for the common good.
Mary, It's fine if you're running Palin for president
I think that's an interesting idea actually, but it is rather beside the point. The real point (of the article) is Obama is trying to figure out something like the first internet presidency. The Pilot wrote about that. Then a handful of the radical right (along with the statistically appropriate assortment of yahoos) piled on these comment boards. I, as a bit of a yahoo from the left, felt compelled to respond. Somewhat later you admonished me (albeit via my ilk) to stop picking on govener Palin (which according to you is a lot like arson) and then associated me ( again via my ill-defined ilk) with actual arson (something we all should agree is a despictable act). Further, if I'm following you, you complian that I'm not a good winner.
Take Aways:
1. Palin '12!
2. People who support Obama also support arson
3. Fletcher Pratt is not a good winner
Fletcher
I respectfully disagree, if you are *still* calling Sarah Palin a pit bull. What did she ever do to you? Why can't you let it go? She asked some questions about Obama associations that many overseas sources stated would be fair game in any election *except* an election where people were feeling overly sensitive about race. If Obama had been running to be our sixth or seventh black president, his early associations would have been picked to pieces and you know it, if you're honest. It was just that we were all holding our breath hoping no crazy person would go after the guy so we (left and right alike) kind of made questions that would be asked of other candidates off-limits in his case.
If you have ever watched good plays like West Side Story and Romeo and Juliet, there are always instigators in the middle who stir up the extremist folks to violence. I was afraid for both Obama and Palin, all campaign long.
Mary
to the degree you belong to "radical and largely racist right" the rest of my post applies to you. If you find the shoe doesn't fit, don't feel obligated to wear it. Were you to read this thread of comments you'd note a slew of hateful and irrational bile (a few of which seemed to have dissapeared) mixed among the more reasonable and pertinent posts. In particular those involved in the aforementioned strawman enterprise and, of course, the ubiquitous racists. Were these specimens not so prominent I'd certainly be disinclined to focus any attention on them. However, since bile spewed from the "radical and largely racist right" is a daily occurance on this paper's comment boards and since this group seems intent on taking down our president elect in addition to the rest of their agenda of hate, I'm disinclined to ignore them. Note that you only made a comment here to address the discord on the comment boards and not the story itself. And then only to offer some lame self serving analogy -- a back handed defense at that. Given that, I'm frankly baffled as to why you seem offended.
FletcherPratt
Gracious in victory, are we? Calling us right wing rabble because . . .?
I am very surprised how many people don't stop at being happy that their candidate won but continue stomping on the necks of polite, reasonable Republicans, acting much like the Assyrians of old, who always had to publicly plant their feet on the necks of the vanquished. Is that your vision for America--a place where anybody can have freedom of speech, as long as they agree with you?
odder still
"I hold the people who ran their hater mouths about her (and inflamed the crazy sector) pretty directly responsible for this." I find it odd that you completely forget what a lying muck-raker candidate Palin was. The church burning was a crime and should be investigated and punished but to paint all of Palin's detractors with the same brush is frankly idiotic. Palin was the hater in the national equation. Palin was the pit bull. The crime of arson doesn't not explain away, erase or make up for her behavior on the national stage. People who were opposed to her for political and social reasons don't equal yahoos who set churches on fire. The implied comparison fails. The burning of the church doesn't equal the attacks on Obama. Did you learn that sort of logic in church?
Well said, and I agree
Well said, Fletcher! You hit the nail on the head. And you said it better than I, to be sure! You're right, the naysayers are nothing more than parrots, and for all I care, they can keep squawking all they want. It won't do them any good. And well said, Mary! I have no hard feelings regarding Sarah Palin, and never wished her any harm. We all have a right to express our opinions, etc., but to commit arson is beyond me! That should not be tolerated, and I hope the perp. is caught!
Same old song and dance democrat style.
Don’t be to upset if the heavens don’t open up and the world doesn’t start singing when the messiah takes the oath. You’re going to see more of the same corruption only Chicago style. I know “Awaiting Staff Approval” for the next 12 hours!