The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
Help may soon be coming for cities in their fight against vacant, boarded-up buildings.
A bill with Portsmouth roots that targets blighted properties - shown by studies to attract crime and damage nearby home values - received a House subcommittee's unanimous approval Thursday.
Martha Ann Creecy and three friends from the Neighborhood Quality Task Force of Portsmouth left home at 5:30 a.m. to support the bill later in Richmond.
"People are clearly recognizing that derelict, blighted properties are at the root cause of some of our older neighborhoods' deteriorating," Creecy said after the subcommittee vote.
The bill's future looks bright. Del. Riley Ingram, R-Hopewell, who agreed Thursday to co-sponsor the measure, is chairman of the House Counties, Cities and Towns Committee - the panel that will consider the legislation next.
The anti-blight bill, HB1671, and its Senate counterpart, SB1094, define a building as derelict if it is vacant, boarded-up and isn't connected to utilities for six months. A city can order the owner to submit a plan to demolish or renovate, and then can qualify the owner for a tax credit for as long as 15 years.
The legislation allows cities to begin the court-ordered process to sell blighted properties after one year of tax delinquency instead of two.
The bill makes it easier for cities to act against blighted buildings and provides an incentive for owners to cooperate, said Mark Flynn of the Virginia Municipal League.
City officials from Norfolk, Portsmouth and Newport News have been some of the bill's most ardent supporters, Flynn said. Vacant homes are twice as prevalent in Norfolk and Portsmouth as they are in other Hampton Roads cities.
Dave Forster, (757) 477-6386, dave.forster@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo



Here that noise?
Its the residents in and surrounding Ward's Corner cheering that maybe we might again have hope for a long overdue revitalization!
Unfortunately, they don't.
Unfortunately, they don't. Emminent domain now has very strict guidelines. I think this is more of a carrot rather than a stick approach with the tax credits.
Why Are More Laws Needed?
Why doesn't the existing Spot Blight and Imminent Domain laws take care of this problem.
Short Sighted
It would seem this proposal may make vacation homes subject to legal action for no other reason than the owner uses it intermittently, prudently boarding it up and disconnecting the utilities when it's not expected to be in use for an extended time. While I applude the intent, a little more thought regarding what property is liable is needed.