66°
forecast

EPA study warns of rising seas along Virginia coast

Posted to: Environment News Virginia

After more than three years of study, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency released a report Friday on the potential effects of climate change and sea-level rise on Virginia and the rest of the mid-Atlantic.

The conclusions: not very good.

Using conservative estimates, the EPA says the eight-state region from New York to North Carolina is an area that "will likely see the greatest impacts due to rising waters, coastal storms, and a high concentration of population along the coastline," according to an agency summary.

The report finds that low-lying areas in Virginia Beach, Chesapeake and Norfolk and on the Peninsula, where port terminals, railroads, sewage plants and military bases can be found, face real threats from rising seas.

The 786-page document also describes Virginia's Eastern Shore as "uniquely vulnerable," especially its vast salt marshes and barrier islands, which are key habitat for fish, shellfish, migratory birds and other wildlife.

Previous studies have painted similar scenarios in recent years, but the report Friday represents the federal government's official word on global warming and its possible consequences to the Chesapeake Bay and other Virginia ecosystems.

"It's an important document, no doubt," said Carl Hershner, the sole Virginia scientist who worked on the project and a wetlands expert at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science.

However, Hershner said he was "disappointed and a little frustrated" that the final EPA report did not contain specific data and mapping that appeared in earlier drafts and depict a much fiercer threat.

Furthermore, because the research effort took so long, he said, some estimates about the pace and extent of sea-level rise and the potential effects are dated and "probably underestimated, at best."

The report was authored by the EPA, the U.S. Geological Survey and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and includes scientific research compiled since 2005 from myriad state, federal and international sources.

It finds that global warming is real and that sea levels are rising faster - and can be expected to keep rising faster - because of human activity and the burning of fossil fuels, such as oil and gas.

"Increasing atmospheric concentrations, primarily from human contributions, are very likely warming the atmosphere and oceans," the report says.

The report concludes that sea levels rose globally about 1.7 millimeters per year through the 20th century - on the heels of a period of little change during the previous 2,000 years, back to the last Ice Age.

"The rate has increased over natural rise due to burning of fossil fuels," according to the report.

The mid-Atlantic has seen an even quicker rise, the study says, because sections of the coast - especially in Virginia - are physically sinking, a process called subsidence.

The authors urge state and local officials to change their mind-set about global warming and start planning for rising sea levels today.

"Most coastal regions are currently managed under the premise that sea-level rise is not significant and that shorelines are static and can be fixed in place," the report reads.

"The new reality of sea-level rise due to climate change," it continues, " requires new considerations in managing areas to protect resources and reduce risk to humans."

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Those same scientists said...

back then an ice age was coming! Why should we believe them?

Unequivocal warming...look at the data

Despite the grossly misleading posts in several comments here, the global warming trend is unequivocal. See http://tamino.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/lowess2.jpg?w=490&h=362. Cherry-picking data such as a particular year (e.g. 1934 or 1998) is not at all scientific. There are always short-term variations. Climate trends are long-term, global trends. The warming since the 1970s can not be solely explained by any natural variations. Not solar variation, not cosmic rays. It is only when man-made greenhouse gases and their subsequent forcings are considered can the global warming trend of the past 30+ years be explained. Stick to rigorously peer-reviewed scientific data. Every major *climate science* professional organization across the globe agrees that the warming that has occurred since the 1970s is due to the additional effects from greenhouse gases.

Good observation Dr Tabor!

Wow! That is good stuff to read. My curiosity has been aroused and now I'm going to go read up on termites and other such "stuff". Thanks Dr Tabor!

Marty, where do you think the Carbon in fuels came from?

Every atom of Carbon contained in fossil fuels was already in the atmosphere, before it was removed by ancient plants by photosynthesis.

The only "new" carbon in the cycle is that which is released by volcanoes.

Further, CO2 released by soils and the oceans in response to warming are each more than ten times that released by humans.

Even termites contribute more to greenhouse gases than humans. (Mostly methane, which is 21 X as potent as CO2 per pound)

Though the amounts we release may sound like a lot, they are insignificant compared to Carbon from natural sources, and CO2 is insignificant as a greenhouse gas compared the water vapor.

Marty is funny!

So what caused the mini ice age and subsequent warm up after that? What caused the global ice age and subsequent warm up aftet that? Lol! Of course he won't have an answer for those questions. Global warming and cooling is cyclic (pronounced sick-lick) and there is no way to determine what is going to happen 10 years from now with the global climate. Of course if a butterfly flatulates...it could be the catalyst for a hurricane somewhere! Government funding is all these scientists are interested in and their interests are to keep it flowing.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs172-96/

Of course you'll read it right Marty?

Tabor Reference...

Mr. Tabor, You are citing a US high temp record from the 30's. I'm referring to the global records. Again, this is a simple equasion. We can't take millions of years of bio-mass in billions of barrels of fossil fuels and release it into the atmosphere over the last mere 150 years and not expect an impact. The ice core samples show this manmade increase. The midieval climate warming was a natural occurance... They were not driving 2 billion cars or bletching out smoke from thousands of coal fired power plants.

gotta love irony

This coming Tuesday, Al Gore and the rest of the global warming sky-is-falling crowd will be watching their man take the Oath of Office during one of the coldest inaugurations in history.

Reference? Sure

Here's one, 1934 was the warmest year, 1921 was 3rd.

http://eteam.ncpa.org/news/nasa-backtracks-on-1998-warmest-year-claim

That is not to say that the climate is not warming. It has been on a general upward trend for the last 11,000 years. But it has been warmer in the past than now, as we are still recovering from the Little Ice Age and have not risen to Medieval Warm Period levels yet. We aren't even back up to the trend line yet.

What is important to note from the climate data is that most of the warming actually occurred BEFORE the industrial revolution and cannot have been due to use of fossil fuels.

The climate changes due to factors over which we have no control. We would make better use of our resources adapting to that change rather than in futile attempts to dial in the climate we desire by changing light bulbs.

okay - - look at it this way

Granted I'm not a gynecologist/geologist/ecologist...whatever-they're all the same when we get down to brass tacks.

Here's the rub-don't believe what a politician states as fact. We should all know by now that they're lying when their lips start moving.

After that bit of advice, follow the money.

Don't drink the global warming kool aid!

The earth releases massive amounts of gasses everyday all around the world. Here is a link to the USGS web site which describes 300 tons per day emmissions for quite a while. And that is just one small area of the planet. During this 7 year period about 766,500 tons of CO2 were released. While you are at this web site look around a bit, you may be surprised by the amount and types of gasses that have been released into the atmoshphere during volcanic events. Happy reading!

http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs172-96/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners