The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
Inside a bland conference room, Sherri Skinner listened intently to a local Realtor explain the home-buying process.
This spring, with the assistance of the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority's HomeNet program, the single mother and account representative at a local hospital will buy a townhome on Church Street. She has been working toward that goal for more than two years, saving money and cleaning up her credit rating.
But Skinner is part of a dwindling group of people seeking to buy a home. Where she might have been one of 40 participants in a home-buyer education class two years ago, last week she was one of 10.
Authority officials said that as the economy has weakened, participation in its first-time home-buyer program has dropped more than 70 percent in the past 18 months - despite offers of down-payment assistance and ultra-low interest rates for low-income buyers.
The slowdown could have far-reaching consequences.
For years, housing authority officials have relied on HomeNet to provide a steady stream of home buyers for its redevelopment projects. However with fewer people in the pipeline, there is concern that the authorities' construction projects - often in communities they want to renovate and improve - could slow or stop.
"It can put development projects at risk," said LaShawn Fortes, HomeNet's director. "To have stable neighborhoods, you have to have stable buyers. We've had several who've actually said, 'Maybe I need to wait' or 'I'm not sure I'm going to have a job tomorrow.' "
Although Portsmouth hasn't seen a drop-off, Virginia Beach's home-ownership program has had declines similar to Norfolk's, despite increasing its down-payment assistance from $7,000 to $20,000, said Sharon Prescott, the city's housing development administrator. In the past year and a half, only four home buyers have used the city's assistance program - down from as many as 20 in previous years, she said.
The problem, administrators said, is multipronged. Some people are waiting for housing prices to bottom out. Others worry about job stability and foreclosure.
"People are just not buying homes," said John Allen, vice president of housing and financial services for Norfolk's Up Center, which provides home-buyer classes. "It's all because of the economy."
Still others, Prescott said, racked up so much debt during the boom years that they now don't qualify for loans under stricter lending standards.
"There's a lot of interest, but people have such serious credit card debt. They can't qualify," she said. "It's very frustrating. If people would pay down some of that debt we'd have some winners here."
The home-assistance programs are aimed at residents with incomes below 80 percent of an area's regional household median. For families of four, that's $52,100. In exchange for meeting with counselors, attending home-buyer education sessions and providing 1 percent of the home's purchase price, qualifying home buyers can receive thousands of federal dollars on their down payments. Others can get lower interest rates - now dipping around 3.8 percent.
"You're talking about $20,000 to $30,000 of free money," Fortes said.
Yet for the first time, she said, she might have to market her program to draw attention to it. HomeNet employees have to meet a goal of closing on 60 houses from July of 2008 to June of 2009 - a target that is down from 108 closings from June 2006 to the middle of 2007. They are about halfway to their goal right now.
Fortes said they plan to contact teachers, police officers and other city employees who may qualify.
Skinner said she heard about the help from a co-worker.
One evening last week, she sat in a class that included two couples required to be there to meet the standards of their VHDA loan, a few other HomeNet clients and 27-year-old Tony Morgan, a security guard who was referred by a lender. Morgan said he planned to sign on as a HomeNet client.
Participants were asked to turn in spending plans that broke down their monthly expenses and projected how home insurance, maintenance and taxes would affect their budgets. They heard from real estate agents, home inspectors and an attorney about everything from getting title insurance to signing a contract.
"Things are changing. They really are," Anita Roberts, a HomeNet home-ownership counselor, told them.
"You guys are doing the best thing by being educated and doing your homework."
In Norfolk, the housing authority boasts that not a single HomeNet participant has gone into foreclosure.
Education programs run by The Up Center and Portsmouth and Virginia Beach have similar success rates, officials said.
Skinner has already pre-qualified for a mortgage and said she hopes to be in a brick, three-story townhome in the Maplewoods at Olde Huntersville - a new mixed-income development led by the Norfolk housing authority - by the spring.
"It's just having something of my own," she said.
Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


I don't buy it--
Frankly, I don't put much faith in the housing agencies statements that nobody has defaulted on these loans. I see a heck of a lot of the newer houses built during the bubble in Norfolk-- in Park Place, Huntersville, on Church St.-- that are foreclosed and up for sale. Since these were the blighted areas that NRHA focused on pipelining very poor people into, it'd be kind of amazing if somehow these very same poor people are magically untouched by the economic plight that is forcing so many other local homeowners into foreclosure.
If something sounds too good to be true, it generally ain't.
Free Money?
The "free money" concept is insane...kind of like welfare was. It is outdated. However, I am saddened the House buying education classes this program offers may cease to exist. Alot of low income folks are under educated which will lead a mortgage lender to rape them. They can hide excess fees in numerous places as well as structure the loan in many ways... that, was the sole root of an enormous amount of foreclosures.
And, Clearly, it is Never a good idea to buy a house for more and pay lower intrest...that is insane! Buy a house low and pay low interest....the two are not cause and effect. Wether you get a deduction for interest or not. Always seek the lowest possible in all facits of your home purchase.
Mortgage help
Well, first the real estate market needs to improve. And to stop the decline, people really need to take advantage of the aid out there, from Citigroup and others. In addition to Citi, Fannie Mae, The federal gov't FHA, many states, JPMorgan Chase, Wachovia, and Bank of America/Countrywide have committed to helping over 2 million homeowners between them keep their homes. I found more info on the programs here.
http://www.needhelppayingbills.com/html/help_with_mortgage.html
jamiep- without the $30,000
jamiep- without the $30,000 gov't assistance, then the purchase price of the home would likely be cheaper. When the gov't steps in to help, they end up driving up the prices. The credit bubble drove up the prices as people who are not financially sound enough were able to take out huge loans and bid against each other to buy the housing supply. The market responded by building large numbers of houses. Now there is overhang, it's apparent the jobs can't support the housing costs, and the market will crumble.
In terms of the deduction, my point is, why is housing special? What's the difference between buying things you can't afford on a credit card, and buying houses? If there was no 30 year loans for the young people to pay 50% of their income into, how much would homes cost?
On average for the past 100 years homes have appreciated at 3% YoY, tracking inflation. That is all. A primary residence is shelter. It is not a huge investment to retire on. This idea has to go away.
In case you didn't notice, the USA *is* heading for a new Great Depression thanks to the housing mania / credit bubble.
VHDA does a good job
As someone who benefitted from this program five years ago, I disagree with most of the sentiment here. After attending this class, I actually had to set my expectations lower than I expected. I did received a reduction in my rate, but still financed my home with a 30-yr fixed rate mortgate (mostly because they recommended against the ARM during the class). I lost my job last year, but continued to pay my mortgage. Now that I am gainfully employed again, I can say I did not ever default on my loan or my utilities or other homeowner bills. My current salary is much lower than the one I had when I purchased my home, but since I never missed a payment, I bet still do not qualify for assistance under the new system. My taxes will also be used to bail out the foolish, and we will all continue to be crushed under the weight of gov't spending.
"You're talking about $20,000 to $30,000 of free money"
As a responsible, hard-working citizen who has helped fund these programs, I would like to have some of MY money back, please.
You guys continued...
You think that those people don't work and pay taxes just like you do? So I guess they are just taking advantage of their own money then, huh? Cut the everyday people some slack. They get up and go to work everyday and pay taxes just like you. How do I know because I'm one of them and I take great care of my house and am an asset to my community.
You guys...
You guys are so caught up in judging people that you completely miss the point. If a person wants to buy a house that costs $150,000 - which in this area is a VERY modest home that probably needs repairs, but they don't have $30,000 (20% down payment) to put down they just don't DESERVE to be a property tax paying, neighborhood improving homeowner? It's not people being irresponsible, but the unsubstantiated rise in the price of housing that has made programs like this beneficial in this area. If you look at the median income and contrast it against the home prices for this area it does not match up. Additionally, I know more than a few six figure making folks who bought houses at the half million dollar mark that can't afford to spit out the window. The people who take advantage of 1st time buyer assistance can afford the house, just not the hefty down payment. When these people buy a home they (mortgage lender and program coordinator) have gone through their finances, debt-to-income ratio and credit scores the way that the banks use to (before the boom) in order to make sure that they are indeed qualified to be homeowners. You think that those people don't work and pay taxes ju
mortgage interest
"mortgage interest should not be deductible"
I've never been able to claim my mortgage interest. It's less than my standard deduction every year. Suppose it's because I bought wisely.
Patriot - The owner of the
Patriot - The owner of the property the renter is occupying pays the same amount of taxes that a normal owner would, and that expense normally gets passed on to the renter unless the owner is a speculator. So the idea that renters pay no taxes is a fallacy. Their living space is taxed at the same rate as the neighbors that owns. People in general like to feel good about themselves by putting down others, and I tend to see this with the home owner versus renter. To me, a home owner holds the title, all others are renting from the bank. Then these people try to put themselves on a higher plateau as some sort of wealthy person, when really they have tons of debt. Homey don't play word games. I often see the fallacy that renters have nothing to show after renting. They have mobility to go after job opportunities while "homeowners" are stuck trying to sell. Some of us have savings as well. Buying a house will make sense when the prices decline another 40%, or average incomes double. I'll let you take a guess as to which is more likely to happen. 18,000,000 empty homes in the USA, right now.