79°
forecast

Frederick trial delayed as defense investigates witness

Posted to: Chesapeake Crime News Shivers shooting

CHESAPEAKE

Circuit Court Judge Marjorie A. T. Arrington has recessed the Ryan Frederick trial until 2 p.m. today to give Frederick’s defense team time to investigate questions about a jailhouse informant who on Tuesday testified against Frederick.

The trial will resume at 2 p.m.

The informant, Jamal Skeeter, had testified that Frederick confessed to him in the Chesapeake jail that he saw the police outside his house the night Frederick shot and killed Detective Jarrod Shivers.  Frederick has claimed that he didn’t know the police were outside the night the arrived at his Redstart Avenue home in Portlock to serve a drug warrant. 

However, defense attorneys this morning told Circiut Court Judge Marjorie A. T. Arrington that Skeeter has proven so unreliable in past cases that the Portsmouth Commonwealth’s Attorney has refused to use him as a witness.

On Wednesday, Arrington denied a request by Ryan Frederick's attorneys to throw out charges of capital murder and growing marijuana.

After prosecutors rested their case, the defense attorneys argued that the evidence presented in court was insufficient to support a charge of premeditated murder, nor was there evidence showing the manufacture and distribution of marijuana.

"I think that a prima facie case can be made on both charges," the judge said, without elaborating.

That means, barring any other motions, the jury will decide whether Frederick is guilty of capital murder, use of a firearm and the marijuana charge. He's on trial in the Jan. 17, 2008, shooting of Detective Jarrod Shivers during a marijuana raid at Frederick's Portlock home.

On a day packed with witnesses, a video and a jury visit to the Frederick home at 932 Redstart Ave., there was a pause when the judge learned that one of the witnesses, a city detective who was about to take the stand, had learned that his father just died.

Detective Kiley Roberts decided to testify. He described the painful night making a re-enactment video two months after the fatal shooting.

"I almost threw up three or four times," he said of that night. "I couldn't get out of the van. I couldn't move my legs."

The officers re-enacted the raid and shooting, but Roberts acknowledged it was not an exact replica of events.

Special prosecutors, who came from Prince William County to try the case, asked that the video be made so they could better understand the events that happened that night.

"The only thing I could think about was the end of that evening - all that training I've been through couldn't save a man's life," Roberts said.

Defense attorney James Broccoletti questioned how they could have made a video without duplicating exactly how they knocked on Frederick's door the night of the raid.

Frederick claims self-defense. He says he never heard police banging at his door or shouting and that he fired thinking someone was breaking in.

"The most critical and important moment of that night was incorrect?" Broccoletti asked Roberts.

Prosecutors, though, objected, and the judge would not allow him to answer. Broccoletti tried again.

"The knock and announce by you, the method of the knock and announce by you, the sequence of the knock and announce by you, was not correct?" he asked of the video.

"No, it was not," Roberts answered.

After the prosecution rested, the defense attorneys put on at least six neighbors of Frederick's who testified that they heard nothing of the initial knock and announcement by the narcotics detectives, nor did they hear them yelling at Frederick to come out with his hands up after he had shot Shivers.

Thomas Ehret, who lives next door, said he didn't hear anything unusual until his dog started barking and he looked out the window and saw police working on Shivers on his sidewalk.

"Did you hear anyone yelling, 'Police, come out. Police, come out.'? " Broccoletti asked.

"No," Ehret said, adding that the first noise he heard was an ambulance.

Richard Wick, who lives across the street, said the first thing he heard was a loud bang and that when he looked out about a minute later, he saw the officer on the ground in front of Ehret's house.

Other neighbors two and three doors away gave similar testimony.

Sandra Brooks, who lives six doors down and was sitting on her porch that night, said she didn't see the police pull up or hear them banging on Frederick's door. She said she did think she heard neighbors arguing.

"I don't remember hearing anything," she said, until the SWAT team arrived with a bullhorn.

The SWAT team arrived after the shooting and Frederick's surrender.

Broccoletti is trying to show the jury that Frederick couldn't have heard anything, either.

Also Wednesday, several Chesapeake sheriff's deputies working in the jail testified that they had referred some concerns from Frederick to the department's internal affairs office. But the judge would not allow the deputies to explain exactly what th e concerns were.

Frederick's attorneys earlier told the judge, without the jury present, that Frederick had received threats from other inmates and asked that he not be bothered.

Earlier Wednesday, Dr. Elizabeth Kinnison, the assistant chief medical examiner, testified that the bullet that struck Shivers punctured three major arteries, including his aorta.

For more details, return to PilotOnline.com later and read tomorrow's Virginian-Pilot.

Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

I would like to point out

I would like to point out that if a venue change has been granted, the fake witness likely would have never been exposed. Do you really think the prosecutor didn't know? It's nonsense. He needs a conviction of any type. He is trying to prejudice the jury enough so they will at least meet him in the middle. It's sickening the way this has been handled. Yo ucan no longer be proud as an American when the system is breaking down on the front page.

CPD Behavior

Regardless of outcome of this case one thing is absolutely certain - the CPD needs to reeaxmine its tactic, techniques, procedures and ATTITUDE. I am frankly shocked and appalled that you would break someone's door down (annouced or unannounced) to arrest someone for a simple drug charge. That's been argued on this site a number of times. I am not surprised however as the narcotics guys apparently received the same training as the underage drinking goon squad that is the CPD. My son and several of his friends were accosted by undercover CPD cops a few months ago and taken from a bar, thrown against the unmarked car, pushed, verbally threatened and handcuffed all BEFORE it was determined that all of them were over 24 years old. Before you argue that they were drunk or disorderly, they were permitted to drive away from the incident once the facts were ascertained so they couldn't have been that inebriated. My son came home and relayed the story to me and I (being the cop supporter that I am) told him to go to bed that there must have been a misunderstanding, however, now I tend to believe him and not the CPD. This isn't Starsky and Hutch CPD, time for you guys to get some prof

The judge

This jude is definitely ruling in favor of the prosecution. All this is good for a possible appeal. I believe most judges would have berrated the prosecution in open court for at the very least incompetence regarding the informants. Its her job to rule whats allowed and whats not and keep it fair and relavent to the case. Allowing the widow to seek sympathy from the jury was digraceful and disrespectful to the court. Not allowing the jury in the house, not allowing jail guards to disclose IA reports that are pertinent to this case are more examples of her bias. The citizens of chesapeake should be outraged by this miscarraige of justice. Speak out and be heard. If we don't hold our public officials accountable they will become self serving.
"A country of sheep will beget a goverment of wolves"

Case closed....

"The knock and announce by you, the method of the knock and announce by you, the sequence of the knock and announce by you, was not correct?" he asked of the video."

"No, it was not," Roberts answered."

libby

If RF didn't know it was police it is pure speculation to say he thought it was Wright. It was simply a threat with 1 second to ponder who it might be so all you people who say he shot at an unidentified target it was IDed as and confirmed to be a threat by the fact that it was busting through his front door. Are any of you really niave enough to think 911 will keep you safe, I hope criminals don't get wind of how foolish you are. Wise up, buy a gun, and learn how to use it. Thats what "normal people" should do.

Really?

"Also Wednesday, several Chesapeake sheriff's deputies working in the jail testified that they had referred some concerns from Frederick to the department's internal affairs office. But the judge would not allow the deputies to explain exactly what th e concerns were."

I wonder why she wouldn't allow that?

Libbysays

Have you ever tried to call 911? Sometimes it's just hard to get through. I witnessed a guy slamming his truck into a young woman's car. I tried several times to get to 911 using my Verizon cellphone. The guy actually turned on me when he realized I was following the two cars at high speeds through a neighborhood late at night. By the time the police arrived the culprit was long gone. They seemed totally disinterested in any details. I left for home in disbelief. If someone is busting into my home and reaching through the door trying to gain access there isn't going to be time to call our 'men in blue'. Even if there was time they aren't going to be there in time to stop the threat. Well, I stand corrected because they could be the very ones busting through in Gestapo fashion. As for a stray shot hitting a neighbor? What if the police opened up with their rifles and hit an innocent bystander? Does the ends justify the means if it's one of our 'men in blue'?

Trial

Having sat on juries in the past and from what I've read about this case, the term "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt" comes to mind. If I was on this jury I would vote him not guilty.

Local PDs need to review their entry procedures. From watching various reality cop shows on TV anyone can make an educated guess as to what happened here. Busting the door in while at the same moment announcing a raid, it's a wonder not more policemen aren't killed while on duty.

Again yall keep saying that

Again yall keep saying that he shot at a door- he shot at the hand that came in his house through the hole in the door. He didnt just shoot through a closed door, a hand came in his house from the outside trying to unlock his door.

Predicting the outcome

Since there seems to be a fairly close to even split on the posts as to RF's conviction or acquittal, and if the jury even vaguely represents the general public, and if the defense does an even marginal job, it would seem unlikely that a unanimous vote needed for a capital murder conviction is even remotely possible. Removing the passion from all of the arguments posted, and the facts seem like they could definitely be questioned by any citizen that doesn't feel compelled to agree with law enforcement.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox