The Virginian-Pilot
©
CHESAPEAKE
In closing arguments Monday, a prosecutor painted murder suspect Ryan Frederick as a Jekyll and Hyde character who changes his mood to suit his needs.
Frederick's attorney countered to jurors to use their common sense and put themselves in the defendant's shoes.
After hearing closing statements, jurors were told to return this morning to begin deliberations. They will decide whether Frederick should be found guilty in the Jan. 17, 2008, death of Detective Jarrod Shivers.
Circuit Court Judge Marjorie A.T. Arrington told jurors that if they could not find Frederick guilty of capital murder, they could consider lesser charges of first-degree murder, second-degree murder or manslaughter. Frederick also faces charges of use of a firearm and growing marijuana.
Shivers and a team of narcotics detectives were serving a search warrant when Frederick fired a gun from inside his home, striking the detective who would have been the first one through the door. Frederick said he fired in self-defense.
"He's as close to Jekyll and Hyde as you would ever see," Richard Conway, one of three special prosecutors from Prince William County, told the jury.
During Frederick's testimony, he was arrogant, angry, teary, combative and evasive, Conway said, suggesting it was largely an act.
"Do not be fooled by his attempt at grief," he said.
"If he's going to lie about his marijuana operation, what do you expect out of him with respect to the shooting of Detective Shivers?"
Frederick claims he grew marijuana for his personal use, but prosecutors say they believe he was selling it. They also say he lied about seeing an arm and a face coming through his front door after police smashed it the night of the raid.
Conway asked the jury to believe the testimony of the "knights and knaves" who paraded in and out of court during the past two weeks of the trial. The knaves included jailhouse and police informants, whose credibility were called into question by the defense team.
"Steve Wright is not a good guy," Conway said of the informant who broke into Frederick's garage and stole his marijuana three days before the raid. He was the only person to tell police about Frederick's marijuana operation.
"It wasn't an easy road to get the truth out of Steven Wright," he said, acknowledging that Wright lied to police repeatedly.
Defense attorney James Broccoletti told the jury that acquitting Frederick would not mean they were being disrespectful to the Shivers family. He asked that they not return a verdict based on grief, compassion or sympathy.
"We could go another two weeks and not be sorry enough," he said.
The shooting, Broccoletti said, "was absolutely unintended."
"All your verdict says is they have not proven their case beyond a reasonable doubt," he added.
He pointed out the "extraordinary" credibility problems on the part of some of the prosecution witnesses and asked the jury members to use their common sense.
Broccoletti asked the jury to recall the video of the interview between Frederick and two detectives, right after the shooting, where Frederick can be seen throwing up, crying and curling himself up into a ball.
"You saw how nervous he was, how distraught, how upset he was in that interview," Broccoletti said. "Is that someone who knowingly kills a police officer?"
He said Frederick had a reasonable fear of death or serious bodily harm. That's the definition of self-defense.
"You have to put yourself in his shoes," Broccoletti said. "Why would you shoot through an open door but to protect yourself?"
Special Prosecutor Paul Ebert had the last word. He acknowledged that some of the witnesses had credibility issues but said a capital murder conviction can be reached despite the questionable testimony.
"Sometimes, you have to pet a skunk to catch another one," Ebert said.
He said Frederick's self-defense argument doesn't hold up and that he knew police would be coming to his house.
"If you think the police officers are lying, acquit him," Ebert said. "If you believe the testimony in this case, he's guilty."
Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
twomiller
I agree however you can't deny the code of blue is rarely broken....Look at all the officers who testified in the Hammerheads case who lied...Yet the one who told the truth a 26 year veteran of the force catches the #$%....It's Not right Integrity should be rewarded
It is epidemic in VB beach...and judges take an officers word as gold.....Why have a justice sysytem if officers are biased or dishonest and able to get away with lying...
It's terrifying and the code encourages it....
Officers should be required to take lie detector tests like the rest of society in positions of increased stress,responsibility and trust..
They carry guns have immense power over an average citizen and are in a position prone to developing biases,,, a scary combination....
I can't think of a situation enviroment that should require it more...
jonesy
I always reported misconduct of my colleagues. I never filed a false report. 1 of the reasons I went into law enforcement was I wanted to, first hand, do something to lessen the incidents of brutality in my community, to my people, by the police. So, I would never stand for it on my watch, toward no one. In reality, the majority of law enforcement people, in today's time, are decent, fair minded,(as much as their upbringing & life experiences allow), & honest.
Kennedy did
all of those things happen everday...Until the police have respect for the law I will not have respect for them.....Especially Va Beach
2miler
You have a lot of experience as an officer of the law. How many times have you seen or became aware of a fellow officer doing something against the law or against department policy? Whether it be: Filing a false police report; police brutality; perjury; suborning perjury; illegal drug use; taking bribes; failure to investigate a crime; drunk driving; not reporting income from moonlighting; spousal abuse; ect.ect.ect. How many times did you report such "fellow officer" policy or criminal infractions?
Au Contraire Mark,
I'm ex LEO. Many of my family members are LEO & attorneys. I handled narcotics cases on the local, state & federal levels. I kicked in my fair share of doors on drug raids. I've testified at all levels. I've handled evidence at all levels. Now, what makes you think you have the right to suggest my opinion, which is based on years of actual experience, is delusional. You owe me an apology. One has the right to disagree but 1 doesn't have the right to suggest I'm less than sane. If you are 1/2 the person I am, your next comment will include your apology. Have a good 1.
Maybe I missed it
Where is the warrant? What did it say? Which magistrate signed it? What was the probable cause based on? Can we see the actual document? Was it introduced into court? Without a warrant, the police were just breaking and entering like any burglar. We know what the police say the warrant said, but have they produced it?
twomiler2
Delusional. You are not a LEO nor have you ever been one. To make a claim that in all the chaos and half asleep that ANY individual would follow your procedures is....well, delusional. As I stated earlier, anyone busting through my door will be engaged, several times and with something far more powerful than a little .380 pocket gun. Having spoken to several officers, each admits the pain of losing a comrade is hard to accept but the flawed procedure that brought about this death was the root cause. Even Portsmouth's prosecutor had the forthright to notify the defense about that street scum 'witness' that Ebert is so fond of. Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. The CPD screwed up. Their OVER-THE-TOP tactics cost a life. Now they're trying hard to scapegoat another to cover their follies. Acquit Ryan of any charge accept simple possession (time served). That is the ONLY thing that CPD has on him.
Two wrongs don't make a right
I think there is a lot of guilt and sadness and regret over what happened that night but putting that young man in jail for years is not going to bring that brave officer back to his family. I suspect some of the officers involved realize that situation could have, should have, been handled better but can not get on that stand and say that with their supervisors and family members sitting there. They all know and have a desperate need to right a wrong. With recent increases in burlaries my family has recently discussed what would we do if we heard someone coming in and waiting for them to be clearly standing in front of us in the living room so we can identify them... is no where in the plan. What person in their right mind would intentionally shoot a cop if they knew their house was surrounded by them? It just doesn't make sense and its not going to be justice and its not going to ease anyone's pain. The only thing they could to honor him is improve their processes.
So do I understand that if
So do I understand that if Ryan had taken the time to process this situation adequately .... Is there a police car out there? Do I hear lights and sirens (this is the first I heard that he could have seen and heard lights and sirens had he but checked) Is my neighbors dog barking? loudly? Is there really a true danger to me because someone suddenly has cause there to be a big whole in my door? Should I call and check with the police? Will 911 respond it time? Gosh, maybe I should have a security alarm system I'll look up the numbers right now.... then and only then should he have made a decision that this would make good sense?
I don't have a neighbor with a barking dog. I don't have an alarm system. Maybe I need both to protect myself.... from the CPD.
Check out the recent bust by VBPD to see how it should have been handled. Had CBD followed this protocol, we would not be having this debate. A woman and 2 children would no be without a husband and father because of failed police planning and procedures, and a quiet spoken job holder would not have had his life ruined. There is NO WAY, I can blame anyone one but those who planned this rambo event over a few po
Tragedy on all counts
Len Rothman and Themema
You should run for office....Love your common sense statements....What do these prosecutors and officials think they are going to accomplish....It's a lose lose tragedy anyway you look at it…