The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
The 90-year-old house, boarded up and surrounded by empty land, stands only a block from the glistening glass and stone of Old Dominion University's Innovation Research Park in Norfolk.
It's a stark contrast between new and old, progress and past. The tension between the two has landed the university in the middle of a lawsuit that could set a precedent for redevelopment projects under way in Virginia.
A year ago, Norfolk's Redevelopment and Housing Authority moved to condemn the house and three other buildings to the south of ODU's University Village, saying the land was in a blighted area and is needed for the university's expansion.
The owners responded with a suit, saying the housing authority has no right to take their property, in part because the development of University Village in the past decade has cleaned up the blight.
"It's a colossal abuse of the power of eminent domain," said Joseph T. Waldo, the attorney for the owners.
The case is set for trial in Circuit Court this week.
If Waldo is successful, it will be more difficult - and likely more expensive - for Old Dominion's Real Estate Foundation, a development arm of the university, to move forward with the next stage of University Village, a mix of residences, storefronts and university space.
It also could make it harder to finish ongoing redevelopment projects. As ODU has moved forward with plans to remake the east side of Hampton Boulevard, it has had to move in stages - first completing a parking garage, then the Ted Constant Convocation Center, then blocks of apartments and storefronts, then office space and a hotel.
The master plan calls for several more phases, including more student housing and more shopping. But Waldo contends that the work done to the area has made it illegal to use eminent domain, because the neighborhood already is improved.
"If this were to become the law, it would really turn redevelopment on its head," said Tim Coyle, the housing authority's attorney. "You could never complete a redevelopment project if that were the case."
Waldo represents the owner of the house on 41st Street, firefighter Ronnie Boone Jr., the son of real estate developers Ronnie and Judy Boone. He also represents restaurateurs Tommy and Krista Arney, the owners of three commercial properties nearby.
He's argued in a court filing that the housing authority can't use eminent domain because it is taking the property for economic development reasons - not for public use, as required by law. Waldo said the university targeted the area for its expansion before the city made its blight determination - making it obvious that the goal was development, not the removal of problem properties.
In 1998, the housing authority placed nearly all the land east of Hampton Boulevard to Killam Avenue between 47th and 38th streets within a redevelopment district and targeted old buildings for demolition.
Since then, the foundation has spent $6.8 million acquiring properties within the district, some of which were taken through eminent domain.
Virginia's eminent domain law changed in 2007, making it impossible to declare an entire area blighted. But the law gave cities a few years to complete projects already underway, such as ODU's University Village.
"They're clear-cutting the forest," Waldo said. "They're taking every single property."
In early 2008, ODU agreed to move ahead to buy more properties for the next phase of development.
Its foundation offered $1.47 million for the Arney s' land, which includes Skip's restaurant on Hampton Boulevard and other buildings used for storage. The offer, Coyle said, was based on an appraisal.
Tommy Arney countered with $3.15 million, saying he based his figures on square-footage prices the university has paid for other property in the area.
The foundation also offered Boone $140,000 for his house. Boone, who bought the vacant building on 41st Street in 2005 for $125,000, said last year that he wanted $230,000 and for the university to guarantee free tuition for his son.
Coyle said the authority turned to eminent domain only after a sales price couldn't be reached.
"If the parties are pretty close, then it makes all the sense in the world to resolve it outside the court," he said. "But we're using the public's money so we can't just say 'Oh you want $3 million, we'll pay you $3 million.' "
Attorneys and officials with the foundation declined comment, citing the pending trial date. If the housing authority is allowed to move forward with the condemnation, Coyle said, it will pay the appraised value for the properties.
Waldo said he plans to appeal if his clients lose.
"We're either going to win it in Norfolk or we're going to win it in Richmond," he said.
Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Shame on you selfish people
Greedy absentee landlords and the fear mongering libertarians who foolishly support them are a cancer to Norfolk communities. The best way to preserve your property rights is to be a responsible and considerate neighbor who maintains your property.
You people wouldn't rent a spare bedroom and share your bathroom with drug dealers and gang bangers or open your house to rabid racoons, feral cats and packs of stray pit bulls; yet its okay to "invest" and let your vacant house become a public danger to hard working neighbors who try to keep their houses looking good and their property values up.
Shame on you and your right to be a greedy, bad neighbor.
This one makes no sense.
This one makes no sense. Ronnie Boone has made millions off Norfolk's Redevelopment and Housing Authority in the Ocean View area. I really see this as “biting the hand that feeds you”. This old boarded-up building is nobody’s home and hasn’t been for years. It was one of those old run down houses that was rented out to students. It was bought to make a profit and if Ronnie likes it so much he can live there. Once torn down along with the old stripper bars, it will make room for much needed expansion at ODU. Another research center, 900 more dorm rooms, & shops all will do a lot more for us than this old run down building. This state supported school puts $600 million into the local economy each year. All the new construction will provide MUCH needed jobs and will give help to an area that without the school would be a total loss. This may be a very good case for eminent domain, remember NRHA try to buy this land at a fair price. They are not trying to steal someone’s home. When our kids or grandkids try to get into ODU and the rejection letter comes back saying they don’t have enough room or the cost just went up higher & higher. We can tell the Boones and Lawyers
In today's market they
In today's market they should offer every person 90 percent of what they paid.
is odu in the business for making money?
yes they are. To take this mans property for any reason is wrong if the property is handed over to ODU. ODU wants to make more money, and that mans property will make that happen, then it seems their is a supply and a demand. ODU offers the right price and they can probably get the property. Thats capatilism. Thats free market. Thats part of what this country is founded on. This eminent domain should not even be in court. This will be legislation that determines are we indeed headed to socialism. If the government can take this land from this guy and hand it to ODU, that is socialism. It is wrong to do. The last time I remember this happening in this country was when a king ruled us. We went to war of crap like that. No, our government cannot take this man's land from him for any reason and to especially to enable ODU to expand their capatilistic aims. Emienent domain is one of the most abused powers of a local government. Most enienent domain actions should be considered unconstitutional and would be if attempted in 1792.
42nd Street
They should also take 42nd Street. (All of It) It would really reduce the crime rate in that area !
I hope Mr. Waldo fights them
I hope Mr. Waldo fights them tooth and nail. NHRA are nothing but real estate gestapos.
Is the deal 'straight up'?
I don't trust many eminent domain situations, but by all means, they should fufill a truly public utility like allowing for infrastructure requirements, like roads, bridges, etc. To enact eminent domain for reasons of increasing tax revenues, i.e, economic development, always smacks of deals made between the buyers (read, public officials) and those who are going to do the actual developing, and the buyers get the desired property at (often) less than market prices. A smarmy deal if you will.
That said, the Boones are certainly connected within real estate circles here in Tidewater. I do not begrudge that, I just point that out. Purchases and development of properties by entities affiliated with govt, like ODU certainly is, takes time and a fair amount of public debate. My question is: did the Boones have anything that amounts to 'insider info' to make this purchase? If yes, as far as real estate laws and practices, is that ethical/legal? If it is, then so be it. If they usued their clout in a way that's not available to the rest of us, that should be taken into account by the courts as well, for determining the correct cost that should be paid by ODU.
Condemnation of Real Estate.
NRHA was a bad idea that now has gone on steroids.
Eminent Domain is legalized theft.
If the property in question is code sub standard then the City can fine the owner out of existence.
Property owners in Ocean View sure got screwed when a line was drawn around condemned property that they could not sell,improve or trade.
No code violations
The last time I checked the city's website it was not a code violation to own a boarded up house. Since I don't see any abandoned vehicles in the yard, high grass or trash strewn on the property from the pictures, I don't think there's anything the city can do in reference to citing Mr. Boone for violations. Wasn't there a bill before the legislation this session to allow the cities more control over boarded up properties in their cities? I don't think that bill made it out of committee. So as long as Mr. Boone pays his property taxes, the city and ODU are stuck.
It's an interesting idea to just build around him but I don't think that will happen either. I'm sure the area is currently zoned as residential and there's going to be a problem changing the zoning while the house is still standing.
does George Orwell's 1984 ring a bell?
Seems every week there's more and more actions being taken and laws being passed to give the government a tighter grip on it's citizens (i.e. control of restaurant and bar owners decisions). One of the civil liberties held close in this country's history has been a person's right to outright property ownership. Imminent domain initiatives except under the most dire circumstances has flat out been abused for reasons of simple greed across the country. Fear not though, there's more to come and this issue will wilt under the weight of future civil liberties to be eroded with every little (Pandora's Box) law that get's passed throwing the door open even further to the doom faced by the great Roman Empire. We're self-destructing form within for the sake of "Feel Good" legislations.