The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
A bill moving through the General Assembly wants to pin a new name on clotheslines: wind energy drying devices.
The decidedly green description, included in a proposed law to stop community bans on airing laundry outside, is an example of how pervasive renewable energy has become this session.
Several state lawmakers, motivated by the economy, the environment and national security, are pushing renewable energy as never before. They introduced bills for offshore wind farms and more traditional farms that turn manure into electricity, for green roofs and solar panels, for clean energy jobs and clean energy research.
"There's just more than I ever thought would happen," said Ken Jurman, renewable energy program manager for Virginia's Division of Energy.
The measures that have drawn the least resistance have little, if any, cost attached. Most, such as the clothesline bill, would relax restrictions to make it easier for people to use renewable energy.
However, a raft of bills that would offer tax incentives or breaks to stimulate the development of renewable energy businesses or processes have not succeeded, their path made difficult by a $3.7 billion revenue shortfall in the current budget year.
On Wednesday, Del. Joe Bouchard, D-Virginia Beach, read a list of bills that were intended to encourage investment in clean energy at a Green Jobs town hall meeting at Virginia Wesleyan College.
"Well, guess what happened? All the incentive bills were killed, either in committee or on the floor," Bouchard said.
Bouchard, who served on the Governor's Commission on Climate Change, attributed the failures to "powerful anti-environmental forces."
The large volume of legislation this year has led to at least one marathon legislative meeting. A House energy subcommittee worked past midnight with a docket of 23 bills, more than half of which involved renewable energy issues.
Discussion ranged from renewable energy credits to turkey waste to net metering - the practice of feeding excess renewable energy into the electric grid. One bill broached the definition of biomass, or organic material. Another touched on how far a 100-megawatt wind farm would stretch on a mountain ridge.
Alternative energy is new territory for many lawmakers, said Sen. Chap Petersen, D-Fairfax.
He sponsored bills to give a $1,000 tax credit for each new "green job" that pays an annual salary of at least $50,000, and credits for electricity made from wind or solar power. Another would have required state agencies to buy at least 20 percent of their electricity from sustainable resources by 2020.
They failed to get to the Senate floor for a vote.
"People want to be in favor of green bills," Petersen said. "But then when they're presented with an opposing argument, or an argument saying, 'Well, this is going to be anti-business or bust the budget,' there's not enough institutional knowledge at this point to come back and answer those criticisms."
Legislators from both parties say the General Assembly is more willing than ever to listen, however.
Bouchard said earlier this year that he saw a significant shift among Republicans on energy. Nationally and in Virginia, they're taking an "all of the above" approach, embracing alternative resources as well as fossil fuels, he said.
During this year's session, House Speaker William Howell, R-Stafford, issued a news release noting the GOP had an "Alternative Energy and Conservation Package." Included in their plan was a measure to change the state's incentive for biofuels so it favors those from non-feedstock sources, such as algae, and a bill to streamline the permitting process for smaller renewable energy projects.
Some researchers have said Hampton Roads could be the epicenter for one of Virginia's biggest renewable energy opportunities.
The region has first-class winds off Virginia Beach and the biggest electrical substation on the Atlantic Coast between New York and Savannah, Ga., said George Hagerman, director of research for the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium.
Hagerman's research consortium, which is based at Old Dominion University, has said a wind farm could be built off Virginia Beach's coast with 200 to 300 turbines that would be all but invisible from shore if placed 12 miles out. The project could cost $2.4 billion and create more than 1,000 jobs over three years, the consortium said.
Sen. Frank Wagner, R-Virginia Beach, who helped create the research consortium, is trying to lay the groundwork for that vision.
One of his bills seeks to coordinate Virginia's offshore wind energy development with Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey and New York. A second measure would give the Marine Resources Commission the authority to lease underwater land for offshore wind development. Both passed the Senate unanimously.
Pilot writer Scott Harper contributed to this report.
Dave Forster, (757) 477-6386, dave.forster@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
According to a page I found
According to a page I found on Va Tech's web site, nationally, in 2005, the US generated 4,054,688 thousand megawatthours or 4,054,688,000,000,000 watts. What comes after a trillion? My little nephew says it's "like a bazillion" but, I don't know. Anyway, renewables made up only 2.5% (94,932 thousand megawatthours) of that and here's the real kicker, ya' ready, petroleum products (oil) made up only 3% (122,522 thousand megawatthours).
Just fun facts. Also, I'm curious, how many coal miners lose a job for every "green" job created and insofar as underwater structures of wind turbines being good habitats for fish, isn't that like saying overhead wires are not all bad because birds can rest on them?
Coastal Winds, Recreational Fishing, and Jobs
The coastal winds off the Atlantic Coast has a lot of energy potential. This is obvious when you go to the oceanfront in the Fall, Winter, and Spring. Beyond the scope of the energy industry an offshore wind farm would help create jobs in the local area, provide support structures that attract fish, and more importantly provide power to a energy using load center that is close to the energy source.
Energy Portfolio
The United States should have a diversified energy portfolio. We have seen from recent scandals that no one should invest their retirement portfolio into one stock or even one industry. Why should the U.S. invest its future in one energy source? If the U.S. relied only on oil then our energy prices would be tied directly to the changing price of oil. We all saw what happened less than a year ago, it helped drive us into a recession. So, with oil, nuclear, coal, and natural gas power plants the U.S. should also add non-conventional and renewable sources of energy to its portfolio such as wind.
Energy!
For the Energy we need to be practical,it must be:
Efficient,
Reliable,
Cost Effective,
Sustainable,
Not Pie in the Sky, or dependent on whether the Wind blows or the Sun shines.
Hopefully Government Free. i.e.(If the Energy source cannot stand alone in the marketplace cost-wise, it should not be propped up by Government edicts!)
The real answer probably is nuclear, but the usual suspects that are anti almost everything will be ranting that we will all die!
We as a Nation have our own natural resources to create Energy for our own use for many generations if we can get the obstructionists out of the way so we can use them!
Fast Breeder Nuclear Reactors produce more energy than they consume according to News paper articles that I read long ago.
There are a lot of "high and
There are a lot of "high and mighty" homeowner's associations that ban clothes lines and outdoor clothes drying. I agree that if someone is upset at clothes drying outside that person needs to seek professional help. I once lived in a HO association and happily moved out. I bought the house, I own the property and I can do what I want there.
Alternative Energy--jimjones
Jimjones is right. Global energy companies have had alternative energy business units for years now--solar, wind, and natural gas, propane and hydrogen for vehicles (in partnership with automakers). They spent BILLIONS of dollars on these projects and they DO NOT turn a profit. The liberal Democrat Barack Obama wants to create "green collar" jobs--that will be an unprofitable disaster which will demand even more of our taxes. Alternative energy is a great concept and private companies will continue their production and research (tax breaks or limited government grants are ok for that). The discovery of a way to economically replace fossil fuels with environmentally safe alternative energy has been right around the corner for about 40 years now.... Even if such a discovery is made tomorrow, we still need fossil fuels for transportion, power and all the petro-chemicals they yield that are essential for our daily lives.
Thats your elected officials at work!
With all the economic madnees that going on you mean to tell me that they are worried about someones laundry hanging out to dry or another name for a clothes line? They need to be neutered!
Sheets
Anyone remember the smell of newly dried sheets being brought in from the line? Sweet smell of success! No bleach necessary, no dryer sheets to throw in the trash. Towels? Mmmmmmmmmm Right about junk lying around yards but clean laundry hanging out? Unsightly? NO WAY!
Everyone wants to save energy and money, but ....
no one wants be put out or inconvenienced. Folks! That ain't gonna happen.
Try this for fun...
I've been doin' some cypherin' ... The US consumes, roughly, 30,000,000 barrels of oil per day and one barrel of oil is equivalent to 1,700,000 watts. So, to be completely "oil free" we would only need to produce 51,000,000,000,000 watts (yep, that's 51 trillion) from alternative sources per day, right? That sounds easy enough and if we could do it really cheaply, say, for only a $1 or so per watt (I think it's around $3 or $4 now)... get out you wallets.
You have to appreciate the irony in the fact that building and installing 100,000 sq miles of "environmentally friendly" solar panels would be "environmentally unfriendly".