The Virginian-Pilot
©
NEWPORT NEWS
Pete Freeman turned 80 Friday. As usual, he was on the water, working. But not harvesting crabs, as he has done each winter since he was 14.
Instead, Freeman was working for the government, making $300 per day, plus expenses, scouring the bottom of the lower Chesapeake Bay for abandoned crab pots, junk tires, scrap metal and rope, and other marine trash.
"You got to do something," Freeman said with a shrug Wednesday morning as he steered his weathered old boat, the Hot Goose, toward the open waters of the James River for another day of "catching pots."
Freeman, of Hampton, is one of 58 Virginia watermen participating in a work program this winter stemming from a federal declaration that the Bay's once-mighty crab fishery is a national disaster.
In the wake of that historic declaration, Congress approved $10 million to aid struggling watermen, such as Freeman, who found themselves without a job after state regulators shut down the winter crabbing season for the first time in 105 years, in the name of conservation.
For the record, Freeman said he thinks there is no shortage of crabs in the Bay, and that state and federal officials overreacted to scientific estimates about fragile crab stocks. But he is not complaining.
He supports the debris-cleanup program, costing $1.5 million this year and slated to continue in 2010 and 2011 at more than $1 million a year. Freeman said he is not sure what he would have done without it.
"I hadn't had a paycheck since October," he said. "We had heard the state was considering something like this, but we weren't sure. I just wanted to work. I couldn't afford to stay at home and twiddle my thumbs."
The Virginia Marine Resources Commission launched the cleanup program just before Christmas, utilizing state funds in anticipation of federal disaster aid.
Watermen received two days of training through the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, mostly in how to use side-imaging sonars that the state purchased and then installed on their boats. The high-tech cameras allow the crabbers to locate abandoned crab traps, or pots, that have sunk to the bottom.
"OK, see? There's a pot," said Freeman, pointing to a white square that appears on a fuzzy screen aboard his boat.
He pushed a button on a screen that marks the spot, storing the information inside a tiny computer. That way, he could come back and retrieve the pot later. Or he could go grab it right then.
So far, participants have removed more than 3,100 pots from the Bay, as well as 290 derelict peeler pots, 34 eel pots, 16 fishing nets, a baby stroller, an air conditioning unit, chunks of scrap metal and several shopping carts, according to Kirk Havens, an ecologist and project leader at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science.
Previous studies have shown that each "ghost pot" can trap up to 50 crabs, Havens said, posing serious risks to the overall crab population.
Other marine life also gets stuck and often dies in the traps. Victims include black sea bass, catfish, yellow perch, muskrats and turtles, Havens said.
"We're cleaning up the Bay, one piece at a time," Freeman said. "God knows, someone has to do it."
On Wednesday, Freeman was heading to the confluence of the James and Elizabeth rivers, just off Craney Island in Portsmouth, where he had marked a cluster of ghost pots a few days earlier.
Once there, he deployed a self-made "dead-man's drag," a 150-foot-long rope and chain, interspersed with hooks. After sinking the device to the bottom, he maneuvered his boat in a wide circle until he snagged his target.
When he hit the pot, the impact nearly knocked him over. But he held fast and started reeling in the rope, one hand at a time.
Soon, a slime-covered chicken-wire box surfaced, loaded with fish, baby crabs, mud, plants, shell fragments and other earthy life.
There was good news too: This abandoned pot held a veined Rapa whelk, a rare and invasive sea snail that the state is collecting and trying to get rid of.
Freeman flipped the whelk into a bucket of river water and said he can get $5 by turning in the species to state scientists who offer bounties to water men.
Freeman said he has hauled up more than 100 pots from the lower Bay this winter. He throws away the rusted remains once back on land and must record the numbers.
On this day, he snared two pots, though he spotted a dozen others and pledged to come back for them. Since the program allows watermen to work just 48 days through mid-March, he must ration his schedule.
As Freeman puttered back to his Newport News dock, two other participants, who were working up the James River, crackled over his radio. They commented on the nice weather, complained about state regulations and then talked wistfully about the promise of the upcoming crabbing season, which opens March 17.
"Never wanted to do anything else," Freeman said of his 60-year career as a waterman. "You work your own hours, go where you want, when you want, and then go home."
He then smiled, looked ahead into a bright sun, and steered for shore.
Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Come to think of it . . .
At a cost of $300 a day (plus expenses) for a waterman to work and clean the Bay they are commmitted to saving and preserving, it IS a very reasonable and wise investment. Now the state just needs to get more money for the project and expand it. The project saves the Bay, the watermen and the blue crab. Pretty tough to beat . . .
Something Better Than Nothing
At least some of these waterman are getting a few dollars which is better than none at all. Some environmental outfit would probably want a few million just to think about doing it. I hope I am able to get around as well as this senior citizen if I live that long.
Considering the cost of
Considering the cost of fuel, the manual labor involved and the inherent danger of working out on the water, I believe this is not too high a price to pay to clean up this pollution. It's worthwhile, and someone has to do it. Glad this person is healthy enough at 80 to still work and do what he loves.
This comment is awaiting staff approval.
I'm glad they're keeping the watermen working through hard times. That stimulates the economy far better than the Porkulus Project.
Ghost hunters
May not be a perfect solution but at least they are trying to do something right. Giving the crabs a break, offering the waterman a job and a little cleaning up at the same time. Not perfect, but better than doing nothing.
Wow, I can't believe the
Wow, I can't believe the state did something right for once. Just don't screw it up! And if anyone thinks they are getting paid too much for the work, well at least it's getting done. Try getting a salvage company to do it, more like 300 bucks an hour instead of by the day.
A costly program but . . .
The idea behind the program is a good one that the watermen are in complete agreement with: cleaning up the bottom of the bay. The out of work watermen are perfect for the job too. It's too bad the state can't figure out a way to get it done more economically.
Continued waste.
One more point:
At 1.5 million, the cost of this "Kaine" program is $25,862.07 per waterman for 48 days of work.
Continued waste by Kaine and his Administration.
All of this sounds good on the surface, however, the current average is less than 2 pots per waterman per day on the water. $300.00 per day plus expenses is excessive. This program is really a gift from the State. These people probably could have been placed in other jobs at less than half the total cost of this program. Continued waste by Kaine and his Administration.
# of POTS
If they have recovered this many pots then maybe the State should start some kind of a fund to insure that this program will continue each and every year from now on!. They could raise the Permit fees to fund the program or a tag fee for each pot they use. Somewhere they got the 10 mil. wheter it came from fishing license or whatever, some other program has lost monies!. Maybe it is just me but if he had identified other pots but wants to come back to get them does that not increase the cost of this project. I have a problem with paying people to clean up there OWN MESS!.