Despite today's stormy economy, the timing probably couldn't be better for proceeding with an experimental wind farm about 12 miles off Virginia Beach's shoreline.
After years of ignoring or downplaying the nation's energy problems and the significance of global warming, more Americans than ever - including public officials - seem to recognize the urgency of investing in clean, renewable energy resources.
In years past, there was skepticism that a productive wind farm could be safely built off Virginia's coast without interfering with the military, the fishing industry or tourism.
But, as The Pilot's Scott Harper recently reported, a group of scientists and energy experts - asked by the General Assembly in 2006 to generate ideas for green-power projects - has completed a two-year study showing that a wind farm off Virginia Beach would be viable.
The project, which would likely include 196 turbines about 300 feet tall, would cost about $1 billion and create more than 3,000 jobs, according to the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium. Private companies would build the project, and the Navy could be a partner.
The consortium, based at Old Dominion University, includes scientists from multiple universities, Norfolk State and Virginia Tech among them. Other participants include the Virginia Manufacturers Association and the state Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy.
As promising as the group's findings are, the next phase is in doubt. The proposed state budget, cut heavily, doesn't include $1 million for a pilot project using a few turbines.
Some options are available, and they should be pursued aggressively. Republican state Sen. Frank Wagner, who represents Virginia Beach, is pushing to shift money from the state's tobacco settlement to help secure federal energy grants.
There's also talk of drawing money from the proposed economic stimulus bill on Capitol Hill. The package includes funds for development of renewable energy resources.
Wind energy alone can't produce enough electricity to meet the state's growing demand. But a broader range of options would make our state and nation less reliant on harmful sources like coal (think mercury emissions and mountaintop removal) and risky options like oil drilling off Virginia's coast.
Virginia's delegation to Congress, particularly Sens. Jim Webb and Mark Warner, should get behind the wind project, which - as one researcher describes it - is "ready to go from theory to practice." In a time of crisis, it is a venture worthy of scarce tax dollars. DESPITE TODAY'S stormy economy, the timing probably couldn't be better for proceeding with an experimental wind farm about 12 miles off Virginia Beach's shoreline.
After years of ignoring or downplaying the nation's energy problems and the significance of global warming, more Americans than ever - including public officials - seem to recognize the urgency of investing in clean, renewable energy resources.
In years past, there was skepticism that a productive wind farm could be safely built off Virginia's coast without interfering with the military, the fishing industry or tourism.
But, as The Pilot's Scott Harper recently reported, a group of scientists and energy experts - asked by the General Assembly in 2006 to generate ideas for green-power projects - has completed a two-year study showing that a wind farm off Virginia Beach would be viable.
The project, which would likely include 196 turbines about 300 feet tall, would cost about $1 billion and create more than 3,000 jobs, according to the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium. Private companies would build the project, and the Navy could be a partner.
The consortium, based at Old Dominion University, includes scientists from multiple universities, Norfolk State and Virginia Tech among them. Other participants include the Virginia Manufacturers Association and the state Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy.
As promising as the group's findings are, the next phase is in doubt. The proposed state budget, cut heavily, doesn't include $1 million for a pilot project using a few turbines.
Some options are available, and they should be pursued aggressively. Republican State Sen. Frank Wagner, who represents Virginia Beach, is pushing to shift money from the state's tobacco settlement to help secure federal energy grants.
There's also talk of drawing money from the proposed economic stimulus bill on Capitol Hill. The package includes funds for development of renewable energy resources.
Wind energy alone can't produce enough electricity to meet the state's growing demand. But a broader range of options would make our state and nation less reliant on harmful sources like coal (think mercury emissions and mountaintop removal) and risky options like oil drilling off Virginia's coast.
Virginia's delegation to Congress, particularly Sens. Jim Webb and Mark Warner, should get behind the wind project, which - as one researcher describes it - is "ready to go from theory to practice." In a time of crisis, it is a venture worthy of scarce tax dollars.






Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

wind farms
do not have oil spills
Electricity or Jobs?
Wind farms do more than create jobs. Their primary purpose is to create electricity. Before building a wind farm let's take a close look at the amount of electricity other wind farms already generate. ...then make the decision. For common sense energy research see www.energyplanusa.com .
Tourism??
How, exactly, do oil rigs so far off shore that they cannot be seen negatively affect tourism while turbines which would be close enough to be clearly seen and heard not? Aside from which, fishermen would come here to fish near oil rigs.
Then, of course, there are the chopped up seagull corpses washing up on the beach to consider. But on the positive side, the crabs would have more to eat.
More seriously, if you want to invest your own money on windmills and sell the electricity on the open market, go for it. But don't take my tax money to "invest" in technology that I would not invest in voluntarily and then force me to buy overpriced electricity with 'green' mandates.
When you can't get private investors to build something without a subsidy, that is the marketplace warning you.
Tabor
In re to the tourism issue, I think it's pretty obvious that there is a negative stigma attached to oil rigs. On the contrary, there are many that see wind turbines as a beautiful thing, and the sight of them a few miles offshore could actually increase tourism in the area rather than hurt it. I wouldn't be surprised if a few "turbine boat tours" started up to take people out to them (with permission, of course)
wind
oil,natural gas, you gotta use all the rsources eventually away from fossil fuel.
Offshore Virginia
Drill the oil wells and build the wind generators. I think it's the greatest idea yet. (Probably no one will like it now we agree with it) It's about someone broke from the old, tired mold and really look into the future...the future is not a Ford Expedition w/V8 engine!
Power for the math impaired?
So, a few drilling rigs 40 miles offshore (below the horizon) would destroy tourism, but 196 300ft tall wind turbines 8 to 12 miles off the beach are OK?
In only a week, the number of green jobs to be expected from the Billion $ project grew from 1000 to 3000, bringing the cost per job down from $1,000,000 per job to a mere $333,000, only 6 times the cost of a private sector job.
Presumably, the increased number of jobs will raise the cost of the electricity generated from above the 3 to 4 times the cost of nuclear energy to something even higher.
I take it the math and science requirements in journalism school aren't all that high.