81°
forecast

33,000 local homeowners owe more than homes are worth

Posted to: Business Real Estate News

More than 33,000 homeowners in Hampton Roads owed more on their mortgages than their homes were worth at the end of 2008 as home prices continued to fall, according to a report released Wednesday by a mortgage research firm.

That's roughly 13 percent of all mortgages in the local market, according to First American CoreLogic, which is based in Santa Ana, Calif., and tracks mortgages across the country.

The firm's quarterly report, which broke out Hampton Roads data for the first time, also said that an additional 10,000 mortgages will be "underwater" if home prices in the area decline 5 percent from their current level.

Homeowners who purchased at the peak of the local housing boom, especially with little or no down payment or an interest-only loan, are the most susceptible to finding themselves "underwater," or "upside down" - owing more than a homes is worth. Falling home values can erode any equity homeowners have in a newly purchased or refinanced home.

Home prices in Hampton Roads have slid 13.7 percent in the past year, according to Real Estate Information Network Inc., the local multiple listing service. The median sale price for existing homes in January was $194,000, down from $224,900 a year ago.

"The accelerating share of negative equity, combined with deteriorating economic conditions, means that mortgage risk will continue to increase until home prices and the economy begin to stabilize," Mark Fleming, chief economist for First American CoreLogic, said in a news release.

Economists and real estate experts say owing more on a home than it's worth is one of the most common precursors to foreclosure.

"Certainly these are the types of people who, given any change in their economic status, are likely to throw in the towel," said James Koch, an economist at Old Dominion University.

Across the country, more than 8.3 million homeowners owe more than their homes are worth, representing about 20 percent of all outstanding mortgages, First American CoreLogic reported. The majority of such "negative equity" mortgages are in states such as California, Florida, Texas and Michigan. In Virginia, 19.6 percent of all mortgages were underwater.

The company said in its report that most of the increases in those mortgages in the months ahead probably will come in markets that have not already seen deep declines in home prices.

The "worrisome issue" going forward, Fleming said, is not just the severity of negative equity in the states hardest hit thus far "but the geographic broadening of negative equity that is expected to occur throughout the year."

Brian Holland, president of Virginia Beach-based Atlantic Bay Mortgage Group, said many of the region's upside-down loans could be attributed to mortgages guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs with no down payments.

"Your typical VA buyer is going to fund 100 percent," said Holland, whose firm handles such loans from 19 mortgage offices in Virginia and the Carolinas. "After fees associated with the sale, they're automatically underwater."

The report comes on the same day President Barack Obama released guidelines on his administration's foreclosure prevention and home-owner refinancing program. The program is expected to aid as many as 9 million troubled U.S. homeowners, including some with negative equity whose loans are financed or backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

The number of homes for sale with asking prices far below what is owed on the house has been increasing steadily in the past few months, said Barbara Wolcott, president and chief executive of Prudential Towne Realty.

"The ones who are really impacted by this are the ones who have to sell," she said. "Then you're forced in to a short-sell situation."

A "short sale" means selling a house for less than the amount the seller owes the lender. Lenders agree to take a loss on the short sale to avoid the added costs of a foreclosure plus trying to maintain and resell the property.

The process often takes several weeks to finalize, Wolcott said. As more local home-owners take that route to sell their home, short sales will take even longer, she said.

Josh Brown, (757) 446-2318, josh.brown@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

So...

who's to blame for that? People overpaying for houses, property. I blame the jet noise *cough cough*

Are VA loans really the problem?

Since the issue was brought up by one of the people interviewed for the story, I'm curious to know what percent of home foreclosures were on homes that were financed through VA loans. We did a VA loan late last year, and after the fees, we are slightly underwater, maybe less than 2%. But since those of us in the military have a steady paycheck, being underwater doesn't mean we will stop paying the mortgage. Also, when you do a VA loan, the VA selects the appraiser, not the bank or the mortgage broker, so it is more indepedent. None of this picking the appraiser who will make the numbers come out right. So again, since this is a military concentration area, I would like to see some numbers to back up a claim such as the one about VA loans being a major factor in the local home foreclosure statistics.

It doesn't really suprise me . . .

who most of you voted for by the comments made. A new guy gets into office that you didn't vote for and immediately this depression, that's right I said depression, that we're in is Obama's fault. The foundations for the problems that we are having right now started in the 1980's. Reagan's well intentioned plan of deregulation started a very large boulder at the top of the mountain to roll down hill. It started slowly but now has really picked up steam. I was a mortgage banker (not mortgage broker) in the 80's and was told to start pushing these new mortgage plans called ARM's. I fought back with logic. If the homeowner qualifies for a mortgage now what happens if rates go up 4% but his or her wages only go up 2%. My boss didn't call just as long home prices were rising we wouldn't get called on it by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The different, in the beginning, was that Freddie Mac dealt with Savings Banks and Savings & Loans whereas Fannie Mae dealt with commercial banks, mortgage banks, mortgage brokers, etc.

That president of the bank pumped a lot of money into the Republican coffers both for the state that I lived in at the time as well as the RNC. He, the executive vice pres

chocolate lab

Dont forget about our "carbon" emissions.

What goes up...

The article doesn't say anything about the owners of these homes being in danger of losing their homes, it's all about the value of them falling. Markets, often because of the gyrations of the economy, go up and down. It stands to reason that within a few years, IF we can believe what our leaders (guffaw) and their media abettors are telling us, that the economy and thus markets will improve, and the values will rise again.

Another reality to this will be those entrepreneurs who will realize an opportunity to buy good houses at a low price and be able to move them at a higher one, once improvement starts to show itself. That may not be of any comfort to an individual home owner, but for the overall market and economy, that may bode a good thing..

start buckling down

For those facing the possibility of tougher times, I suggest you do th eright thing and cancel your hefty and unnecessary cable/internet bill, cancel your convenience only cell (possibly family plan) bills, and cut up your overly used convenience credit cards, and learn to stretch your income insted of vice-versa. It's amazing when how when all the luxury/live beyond our means items are eliminated how much more disposable income we have left over.
Big picture is there always has been folks who bought more than they could afford and had to give up their mortgages. How much of the 13% are those certain to fail people would be interesting to kow. Personally I don;t think Hampton Roads has it so bad. Our greatest threat housing-wise would be a draw down of forces in which homes would empty of military familes and inevitably drive the value down as a result due to supply/demand (more houses than bodies to fill). Thank GOD Oceana is still around.

Norfolk's Assessment Policy

When I purchased my home (2002) I paid a reasonable price (something that I could afford) and my appraisal was based on comparable sales (not in the same neighborhood). Since then, 4 homes have been built on the last vacant lots in my neighborhood. The sale prices ranged from $375K to $425K. Norfolk adjusted my home's value based on those sales and has doubled the taxable value of my home since 2004. I just wonder if the city would like to purchase my home for the assessed value so that I can move to an area that won't tax me out of house & home? Probably not. I really feel that the assessor and the city has a definite conflict of interest because it is in the city's best interest that their employee (assessor) computes a higher value for the property. We wouldn't have to put up with this situation if it wasn't a "government" function. In private business, we'd be able to go someplace else.

The ASSESSMENT REALLY DOESN'T Matter

Please don't forget that regardless of where the assessed values of the homes go, the localities STILL have a way to get their dime. The assessed value is only one data element in the formula that results in what your taxes will end up being.

The other data element is the TAX RATE! If the vast majority of home values decline in a city, who's naïve enough to think that the cities will not raise the tax rate to compensate?

I've got a buck that says that the City of Virginia Beach will raise the residential tax rate to over a dollar this year to make up for the reduction in values. (BTW, my home went up a few thousand dollars.)

Didn't Get Prime Loans

Undoubtedly these home owners didn't get the "Prime Rate" loans that President Obama, Sen. Dodd, VP Biden and others in Washington got when they bought or refinanced their homes. These home owners aren't in the "Pay to Play" cycle because they can't offer any breaks to the loan/mortgage companies which the politicians can.

Oh and by the way

By the way, those people responsible . . . they are easy to spot. They are either Democrats or Republicans and you people keep re-electing them.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed    Real Estate News rss feed   



Toolbox