End the scourge of mountaintop mining

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

America should ease its reliance on oil, particularly foreign imports, but it shouldn't bury the economic potential and the environmental integrity of Appalachian communities to achieve that goal.

Lisa Jackson, the Obama administration's new Environmental Protection Agency chief, recently ordered her staff to conduct more extensive reviews of 150 to 200 permit applications to strip-mine coal from mountains in southwest Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky and Tennessee.

The controversial mining process, known as mountaintop removal, does exactly what the name implies: It blast the tops off mountains to gain access to coveted low-sulfur coal. But the mountains aren't the only things destroyed; companies have been allowed to dump the remnants of those mountaintops into rivers, streams and valleys below.

Under the Clean Water Act, the EPA has the authority to review permits and raise concerns about water quality and environmental degradation. But, during the Bush administration, the agency was largely bypassed in the review process, leaving the weight of decisionmaking to the Army Corps of Engineers.

Less rigorous reviews caused serious, widespread damage to waterways, fish and wildlife across Appalachia. Some communities, including the town of Appalachia in Virginia's Wise County, attempted to fight back, but their concerns mostly fell on deaf ears.

All Americans, including Virginians who live downstream of strip-mining operations, should be concerned with the short-sighted destruction of mountains and surrounding communities.

Mining companies contend that even the most rudimentary regulations - preventing the conversion of valleys into dumping grounds - will kill tens of thousands of jobs. But the truth is that responsible mining could well preserve jobs, and perhaps even create more, if companies were forced to extract coal through methods that mitigate environmental damage.

For the companies, the short-term profits might not be as great. But ending mountaintop removal would have long-term economic benefits for Appalachia - and for a nation that eventually will have to step in to help communities left behind, and to clean up the environmental damage.

Today, America is belatedly embarking on a transition away from oil toward renewable energy sources. Coal, a dirty fuel even in its "cleanest" incarnation, is a necessary part of that transition.

But the Obama administration can and should take steps to minimize the damage caused by coal mining. EPA officials have acted responsibly by reconsidering the wisdom of blasting off mountaintops and dumping the spoils into the nation's rivers, streams and valleys.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

bob, I don't think that the Sierra Club

has nearly the influence you ascribe to it.

In 2008 all the environmental groups combined spent about $16M on lobbying, whereas the energy sector which is oil, mining, nuclear, etc spent about $388M.

Who do you think gets the ear of Congress?

Environmentalists may make a lot of noise, and sometimes they win a few rounds, but the true source of power lies in corporate America.

The Pilot actually gets one right!

This editorial proves the old addage that even a broken clock is right twice a day. I actually agree with the Pilot on this one, except for one obvious, glaring discrepancy: if one were to take the Pilot at their word here, this practice of blowing off the tops of mountains started, like all other evil things in this life past, present, and future, under the Bush admin! That is a crock, but why bring facts and logic into this. Given that places like West Va are Dem controlled states, the usual environmentalist suspects are conspicuously silent about what goes on there. Big surpise, eh? A web search shows the usual attacks on Bush for this, but fail to note that the Dem governors of states like Tennessee not having a problem with it. I guess outrage will continue to be selective on some matters..

But I agree that this is a disgusting practice. Blowing off the tops of mountains just doesn't make sense. There are better ways to address our energy needs. This practice should cease!

mountaintop mining not pretty

Anybody who says windmill farms are as ugly as mountaintop mining has never seen the after effects of ripping off the top of a hill. The side of the hill is left with an ugly mes of gulleys, no vegatation, the streams full of dirt not held back. Corporate greed is what its all about. Sell the most for the most profit. The environment, public safety is never a concern.

Nuclear Power is a better alternative

I agree that coal is not a good alternative to foreign fossil fuels. The flyash as well as the air pollution (not to mention the global warming gasses) is not good for our environment. However, if we have to mine coal because we refuse to expand our nuclear power capablity in this country then strip mining is preferable. I have known no miners to be trapped in their mines with this type of mining. I understand that it isn't real good for the scenery but neither is windmills. I do agree that we should use windmills and solar cells as much as we can, but from what I understand they will never fill all of our needs for electricity. I think that we should learn from countries like France who have expanded nuclear power extensively in the past 10-20 years with little or no problems. However, I am a realist and understand that a small sliver of our electorate such as the Sierra Club control the majority of our leaders in Washington which means that it will never get any real consideration for the time being.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox