Group pulls support for Asian oysters in Chesapeake Bay

Posted to: Environment News Virginia

NEWPORT NEWS

A key champion for introducing Asian oysters into the Chesapeake Bay abruptly dropped its campaign Tuesday after eight years, saying it no longer will experiment or lobby for the exotic species, despite years of success.

"We're done with it," said a teary-eyed Frances Porter, executive director of the Virginia Seafood Council, a trade group. She called the decision, based on conversations with unnamed government officials over the weekend, "the toughest in my 25 years in this business."

The surprise announcement seems to end years of contentious debate over the possible use of the Asian species to help restore oyster populations in the Bay - a debate focused on the near-collapse of native stocks because of disease, pollution, predators and lost habitat. The natives also have shown little success in returning after 15 years of government attempts.

The announcement also comes as Virginia, Maryland and the Army Corps of Engineers continue to quietly negotiate a new restoration strategy for oysters, good for the next 10 years, that all parties can agree to.

Such consensus still has not been found, and another conference call is expected later this week.

Virginia and the Army Corps have wanted to continue limited experiments with the Asian species in controlled settings, while Maryland, environmentalists, federal agencies, scientists and coastal states want nothing more to do with the foreign animal.

They argue that the risks of an unforeseen accident or new disease stemming from the Asian oyster, even supposedly sterile ones grown under security measures, are too great.

So with the Virginia Seafood Council dropping its interest and support for Asian experiments, including a proposal to grow 1.1 million of them in protective bags and cages this year, the future course appears clear now - with native oysters only.

Environmental groups, which showed up Tuesday in Newport News to oppose the latest Asian proposal, were stunned - and thankful - to hear the experiments had been called off.

"It's the safest and best option out there," said Tommy Leggett, an oyster expert with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation.

Leggett said recent advancements with native oysters provide new hope that, with enough funding and attention, a recovery is possible. The restoration strategy calls for an investment of at least $500 million, by public and private interests, over the next 10 years.

Others were upset by the sudden pullout.

Ernest Bowden, an Eastern Shore waterman and member of the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, said he is "deeply concerned that we will never reach our goal" of restoring oysters in the Bay.

Bowden said the Asian species, which grows faster and does not die in the face of two deadly parasites that often kill native animals, "was our only hope."

Bowden also said he was "deeply disappointed" with how state and federal regulators have handled the matter, and he told one official who favors a native-only approach "to wipe that grin off your face."

Porter, too, said the Virginia Seafood Council remains convinced that, after eight years of controlled experiments in the Bay, the Asian oyster is the only way to restore wild populations.

"The oyster is viable," she said. T here's a demand for it,."

Her latest proposal sought to grow 1.1 million oysters at 11 sites in the Bay, including one in the Lynnhaven River in Virginia Beach and another working with a Norfolk waterman.

The experiments are privately funded and would last 12 months.

But after discussions with various officials over the weekend, Porter said it became clear that Virginia would not approve any more trials with the Asian species, also known as ariakensis or the Suminoe oyster.

She declined to elaborate on her discussions but encouraged reporters to contact the governor's office for details.

Lynda Tran, a spokeswoman for Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, said the governor has not yet decided on an oyster strategy, including what to do about ariakensis.

Tran said the information told to Porter "was not accurate."

"We're continuing to explore the issues," Tran said.

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Welcome to the new oyster industry in Va

Good luck finding the private funds to support the 500 Million dollar replentishment effort. As a former oyster grower, I know firsthand the hogwash that various groups have been shoveling regarding the non native oyster. Oyster aquaculture is decades away from making a dent in the historical levels of Bay oysters and reports of recent sucess in this area have been cherry picked at best. There is hope for long term success with the native oyster but it will take generations to realize. Does the Bay have this long? The question that needs to be asked is how many scientists and "experts" will lose salary with healthy oyster populations? These are the only people that have profited in the last 25 years of "restoration" More money is not the answer and mark my words, in 5, 10, or 20 years, these same "experts" will be asking for another huge amount of money with the promise that sucess is right around the corner. These people should be ashamed

Who is the seafood council

Who is the Virginia Seafood Council and who do they represent?
The article says they are a trade group. Does that mean they are a 501(C)6 corporation?
Go ahead google Virginia Seafood Council.
You would think that a group with enough power to persuade the Commonwealth of Virginia to go against science and allow a non-native species to be introduced could be found that way.
It is time questions were asked about who they are who they represent. It is certainly not the waterman.

As usual...

The public is too stupid for the details ehh? The government knows best. Sha right.

Good choice

I'm not sure where the "big money" fits in, but I think this is a good scientific choice even if it was made for regulatory reasons. Introduced species always seem to trigger the law of unintended consequences.

The Right Decision

Good sense wins out over big money -- hallelujah!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners

special features