The Virginian-Pilot
©
Hampton Roads lost almost 1 percent of its jobs during 2008, the biggest decline among metro areas in Virginia last year, according to revised figures issued Tuesday by the Virginia Employment Commission.
The average employment in the region fell by 6,800, or 0.9 percent, the state agency said after conducting its annual analysis of data.
Throughout most of 2008, the commission had reported sustained job growth for Hampton Roads and the state.
However, figures taken from the unemployment insurance taxes paid by employers indicated that Hampton Roads lost jobs during 2008 and that the losses accelerated during the last three months of the year, said William F. Mezger, chief economist of the VEC's economic information services division.
The average number of jobs in the region during 2008 stood at 768,500, down from 775,300 a year earlier.
"The downturn was steeper than anyone expected," Mezger said.
And the pace of losses witnessed during the last quarter of 2008 appeared to continue into January, February and March, he said. The commission has not yet reported job figures for those months.
Indications as to whether a region is adding or losing jobs are closely watched by businesses - including those in the housing and retail sectors - that rely on personal income for sales.
In Hampton Roads, the falloff in jobs between 2007 and 2008 was especially notable in the retail, wholesale and transportation sectors, which shed 4,200 jobs, and in construction, where employment fell by 3,000. Manufacturing and financial services also witnessed job losses.
The drop in retail employment was marked by sluggish seasonal hiring during the 2008 holiday season, while the falloff in port traffic last year hurt transportation jobs, Mezger noted.
Vinod Agarwal, a professor of economics at Old Dominion University and a member of ODU's Economic Forecasting Project, said he had expected the VEC to scale back its figures for job growth in Hampton Roads, partly because its figures for construction work seemed too high.
However, he expressed surprise at the VEC's report of a decline in jobs. In its annual projections for 2008, the ODU forecasting team had predicted an increase of 7,000 jobs for the region.
Since late last year, employers throughout the country have been slashing payrolls in response to weak demand and dwindling consumer traffic. The Hampton Roads economy, Agarwal said, "is not immune to major forces in the national economy."
However, he and Mezger called attention to the role of defense spending in the region, which has provided a cushion during economic downturns. Earlier this year, the ODU Forecasting Project predicted that defense spending in Hampton Roads will climb 4.5 percent in 2009.
"People need to understand that the Defense Department plays a crucial role in the region's economy," Agarwal said. The university's forecasting team has estimated that defense spending generates between 40 and 45 percent of Hampton Roads' output of goods and services.
Until it has more of the VEC's revised data, the ODU forecasting team will stick with its earlier forecast of employment growth of 0.2 percent, or 1,572 jobs, in Hampton Roads for this year, Agarwal said.
Statewide, the average number of nonfarm jobs fell by 3,900, or 0.1 percent, last year to 3,757,500, the VEC said in its report. Three of Virginia's nine metro areas - Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, Lynchburg and Northern Virginia - posted modest gains.
Tom Shean, (757) 446-2379, tom.shean@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
well said Mo777!
I wish the Bush bashers would take their blinders off. Lord.....I'd just about give my right arm to have GW back in the White House right now - but I need it for work.
It was my understanding that
It was my understanding that the auto maker money had little to do with saving the company or saving the jobs, and more to do with all of the leverage and games played on the back end. The wall streeters used so much leverage that if huge companies fail, it cascades. Insure A by betting against B. Then insure B by betting against A. Over and over. If one fails, poof. Like I said before, the jobs created by the housing mania should not have been. When the gov't throws 500 billion at a bank, it's probably not a net gain of money in the system as the bank has lost so much value on it's assets. It'd be nice if the gov't would push to let the property values revert to, that is a huge part of unwinding this mess. There is zero way they can save it.
I'm sorry, but
"R U Suprised on Wed, 03/11/2009 at 9:26 am.
it seems Mr. Kaine sold all of us on the idea that He was just as much responsible for solving our State's deficit, as Warner was. Now look where we are at."
I'm sorry, but Governor Kaine didn't create this recession/depression. When a business isn't making money there is less tax revenue, and when the consumer can't afford to shop as often, they don't spend, the business then can't buy supplies and it just goes on and on.
Can you explain why you think Kaine is responsible?
Well, there's your problem
Well, that's two trains of thought that prevent success:
- You consider yourself a common man
- You think you need help from someone else
bobbim777
They want the common man to work hard pay taxes and support all the social programs they are creating for those who choose not to work. Eventually you will have to decide how much taking a job will cost you in social benefits (Europe) before deciding if it is worth taking the job.
Socialism works until other peoples money runs out.
economy
pardon me but i am still waiting to hear what anyone anywhere has proposed to help the common man. they are giving to auto makers when we have plenty of cars now. they are giving to banks to make loans but who can get them or pay them back? where is there anything there to help regular people get out of this mess? they want us to borrow to stimulate the economy by spending more but we have nothing to spend and cant borrow with no or poor paying jobs. where is that a help? they should have given every american a sizable check and it would have cost less plus we would be spending. as it is we have nothing to spend. we can even pay the bills we do have. get rid of the high dollar polititions that we dont need and we would have more to go around. get rid of the big bonuses and we would have more to spend. why is that so hard to understand?
Gov. Kaine
I have a crazy question. Is it just me, or does it seem like there's a huge difference from when Mark Warner was the Governor a couple years ago, versus today as Tim Kaine is our Governor? To me, it seems Mr. Kaine sold all of us on the idea that He was just as much responsible for solving our State's deficit, as Warner was. Now look where we are at. The state's budget is in shambles, our roads and interstates are still a mess. What now Governor Kaine? How do you plan on solving our state's fiscal issues?
jwb do a little studying.
jwb do a little studying. Easy money, former president Carter, yes Carter, then former president Clinton, back in 1992, all but required banks and other lending institutions, especially Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to make loans to just about anyone who was breathing, to buy a home. This caused housing prices to inflate, in turn families borrowed against their homes, ie, now we have lots of false wealth. There were alarms sounded. Bush did try to change the lending practices. He ran into a stone wall called Congress. Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd, I have heared each one of them on tape saying there is no problem, we don't need to change the regulations. Now the Chickens have come home to roost. Over valued homes, a glut of homes, and families over extended on credit. So, there is plenty of blame to go around, but you are very ignorant if you try to blame Bush entirely. As for Obama, if he'd just stay in his room for a month, and not say a word, we could get out of this mess! And as an after thought, I thank god every day that Bush was in the White House when we were hit on 9/11. I shudder to think what my families lif would be like today if Bush had tried to make
How much of the job losses
How much of the job losses are related to the housing mania coming to an end? I'd assume small time 1099'ed contractors and illegal immigrants aren't counted in those layoffs. To the previous poster regarding Bush, you need to come to the realization that there isn't much difference between politicians. The two parties are there to keep people like you focused on debating the parties, versus coming to the realization that the whole system is a setup to keep a small portion of our population enriched and in control. I'm no Bush fan, but to be honest, many of the jobs that existed and now are gone should have never been. Remember, the housing mania caused tons of incorrect job gains. All the profits of those jobs were derived from debt, which is now becoming monumental losses, which the gov't is trying to cover with bailout money (more debt).
Data says different
Everyone knows the job market in Hampton Roads is horrible, specially if you're a professional not in IT, or slacking off for the Governmnet.
The data says the job losses have been in the construction and service industries. On the service side it's heavily tourism that's taken a hit. I don't think this has really ever been a hot spot for manufacturing. The press releases are here:
http://www.vec.virginia.gov/vecportal/press.cfm
Still no mention of what's stated in this article on there.