79°
forecast

N.C. judge gets update on Hatteras beach driving ban

Posted to: Environment News North Carolina

ELIZABETH CITY

A beach-driving agreement brought a big change to Cape Hatteras National Seashore, but it might not be the only reason for a bounce in successful bird and turtle nestings, the park's superintendent told a federal judge Thursday.

Superintendent Mike Murray was in court to give a status report on last year's consent decree to U.S. District Judge Terrence Boyle. He said beach closings to protect nesting shorebirds would resume soon.

In April, Boyle signed the consent decree settling a lawsuit by Defenders of Wildlife and the National Audubon Society against the National Park Service. Dare and Hyde counties and a coalition of beach-driving groups had joined the action as defendants. The environmental groups had contended that an interim management plan was not adequately protecting shorebirds and turtles.

Despite nervous speculation about the judge's intentions when he called the parties to his courtroom Thursday, Boyle did little more than listen to the superintendent's status report before dismissing the hearing.

Boyle said he was looking for a follow-up and not testimony from all parties. "This is not a trial," he said, "nor is it an adversarial proceeding."

Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond, said that for some reason, Boyle appears to have a high degree of interest in the case.

"I think the judge is going to keep a tight rein on this," he said. "I think he's watching."

As required, Cape Hatteras National Seashore submitted reports to the court about management of off-road vehicles and pedestrian access during the shorebird and sea turtle nesting seasons.

"The consent decree did cause a big change, I think," Murray told Boyle. "The closures occurred more quickly. They were longer-lasting."

Of a total of 66.8 miles of beach, 25.5 miles were open to pedestrians and 26.1 miles were open to ORVs last year, Murray told the judge. At the height of the nesting season in July, about 11 miles were completely closed. There were also 3.7 miles of beach that were open, but they were blocked by resource protection closures.

In general, Murray said, the numbers of birds and turtles that survived the nesting season were higher than before. But he declined to directly attribute that to the consent decree. "I think there are multiple factors that affect nesting success," he said.

Record numbers of sea turtles were found along the entire North Carolina coast, not just Cape Hatteras. Murray did not try to explain the increase, but he said that one difference in the seashore from the previous year was that night driving was restricted because lights are thought to confuse turtles.

Boyle seemed to associate the new limitation with increased safety, noting there were no fatal accidents after dark. "That's an achievement, because night driving had a significant number of fatalities," he said.

Paul Stevens, the seashore's law enforcement specialist, said after the hearing that the only ORV-related fatalities on the beach he was aware of were on Ocracoke Island in 2003, when one man was killed, and on Coquina Beach in 2004, when two men were killed.

Areas of the beach where piping plovers nested last year will be closed off by March 15, as required, and larger closures will follow as shorebirds and colonial nesting birds start nesting and breeding, Murray said.

An attempt by a 29-member committee of stakeholders to negotiate a long-term ORV plan was abandoned last week. Under the terms of the decree, Murray must develop an ORV regulation by next year.

Dare County, meanwhile, will continue to pursue legislation that would override the consent decree and return the seashore to management under the interim ORV management plan, Board of Commissioners Chairman Warren Judge said after the hearing.

Too much credit has been given to the nesting success of last summer, Judge said, because the protections initially put in place were established under the interim plan. "The consent decree is being given praises and accolades that it's just not deserving."

Derb Carter, an attorney with Southern Environmental Law Center, said after the hearing that the agreement has been effective in preserving the seashore's resources, but he didn't think it has essentially allowed the environmental groups to manage them.

"Our interest is that the Park Service comply with the law," he said. "We're not running the park."

 Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Effectiveness of added protections

This is how well the added protections associated with the consent decree worked.

Piping Plover fledge rate of .636 per breeding pair not only did NOT exceed the previous year's fledge rate of .666 but violates the take provision of the biological opinion (min. fledge rate 1 fledged chick per breeding pair).

False Crawl rate for turtles .92:1 was only slightly better than the 7 year average of 1.04:1.

Unlike the vaugue statements regarding improvement of species productivity within the seashore, my statements are backed up with actual numbers.

neck

you've already changed your view to agree with mine in terms of development and you also betray your lack of knowledge of CHNSRA by assuming it's for only one user group or that pro access groups want it that way. Fact is, there are many different user groups that utilize this resource. Fact is, other than denial of access, there is no other way that NPS can derogate from the recreational mission of the seashore and is therefore in violation of the Organic Act.
The literature you draw from is lacking in law, established use, historical use and is generally inaccurate and skewed. I suggest you take the time to learn the law, the development of the seashore, its current and prior use and cetera. In short, you have relied on one document to establish your views and that document is lacking at best.

Grand Stewards of Beach Driving

You've obviously already read this so go back and read
Page 21 again. Local Govt. lobbied Congress to get the NPS to establish a National Park on the Outer Banks for erosion control and as a make work Civilian Conservation Corp project. If there was such widespread opposition to the NPS coming, why the local support then?

http://www.islandfreepress.org/2008Archives/09.03.2008-CreationAndEstablishmentOfCHNS.pdf

If the NPS had not been directed to establish a national seashore then Hatteras Island would look as bad as Myrtle or Duck.

A national park (or seashore) is not just for one user group. The primary purpose of a national park even with the "recreational area" is to preserve our nation's natural heritage for perpetuity, for your grand kids. I hate to break it to you but outside of coastal NC and VA most people don't think you have a birthright to drive all over the beach.

History

I want you to take a good look at the history of what the goverment has done just in NJ alone. Prime example is Holgate. In the late 90's a little strip of beach that the federal goverment did not even want to be included in a wildlife area, to preserve it NJBBA had to convince them through the help of our legislature rep to accept it with the stipulation and this point is written in the records of Congress, that we would have year around access through walk on & OVI for the purppose of fishing and/or hiking has been closed in the name of preservation (My definition is elimination). We also went through a similar process of different plans that could have kept it open, but one lead man Decided it will be closed to all!!! We went through about three years of wrangling and in the end got the stick. A goverment that "protects you" and "provides for you" is no goverment. It is a dictatorship under the guidance of a few that do it for the betterment of the "BLIND" many.

ALL, WAKE UP!!!! Pretty soon it will come to a point that you will be able to enjoy nature only in front of your TV, and than only what the "goverment" wants you to see. Fight now or loose all!!! The next spot jus

What the Neck?

Neck, your comments with Jesus are kind of out of place. But since you mentioned it, weren't he and his disciples avid fishermen? And if you go to church this time of year you would learn that while most walked, he entered town riding a donkey (kind of the SUV of the day).

The reports of trash on the beach are just wrong. Sunday as I drove Hwy 12 I saw lots, but not on the beach because we pick it up! And it should be noted that much of this trash washes there from the north or south. Try going down to Cape Lookout, Portsmouth Island, where there are fewer people and you will see MORE litter that has washed ashore.

OBX Beach Driving Closures

As an avid hunter and fisherman, I am in complete favor of protecting all wildlife habitat for the enjoyment of future generations. However, I don't believe closing the beaches to ORV use is the right answer in this particular case. With proper law enforcement to prohibit unsafe driving and driving in or near nesting areas, I think all parties can continue to share the beach for years to come. Unfortunately, despite the willingness of Dare County and driving groups to compromise, the preservation groups involved will not accept any solution other than complete closure. I strongly urge anyone with an interest in this subject to investigate all of the true, un-biased facts involved before making a decision. It is not a simple matter of some rednecks and their jacked-up trucks vs. a group of tree-huggers and their pets. The final decision will significantly effect the lively hood of locals and beach access for fishermen and others; all of whom want to protect the very same resources as the conservationists.

So how are you feeding your families

You say the merchants might have a turndown for awhile....

well lets see at least15 businesses have closed on the upper beaches...that is not even touching the financial dureess of Hatteras, a couple of tackle shops ...some gift shops a few restuarants...mattress discounters...
So how are those people suppose to survive we can't up and move someplace because people who have no understanding of history or the fact the birds in question were never original residents. It keeps being said the park service kills animals all the time to protect different species but no one thinks that is bad.
Now ultimately I want to know when Corolla and the North beaches will be closed to protect the plovers up there the sea turtles and the horses.
Its only right....they have as many birds if not more nesting there ...and the carovers drive on the beach all the time killing people
when have they had someone killed like that in hatteras

WOW!

What an astounding statement! The people of OBX ASKED NPS to establish this park? On the contrary, Congress decided to establish this park and rather upset the residents of the islands in the process which is why the director of NPS, Conrad Wirth, promised that the residents of the islands would ALWAYS have access and be able to make a living from fishing. Indeed, NPS changed the park boundaries around the villages to what they are now so that more business would be allowed to grow to accommodate the expected visitation! Congress also stipulates that NPS cannot, without explicit and specific permission from congress, derogate from the mission ( as established) of this park. That permission does not exist to this day. We are not Yellowstone, or any other "generic" park. This a National Recreational Seashore which is very different from every other national park in existence. In fact, this is this countrys first and ONLY national seashore recreational area. It's not I sir, but you, that needs to look things up.

neck

It's pretty obvious that you dont understand Hatteras and Ocracoke. No such development that you suggest can take place here because everything outside of the villages that dot these islands in part of Cape Hatteras National Seashore Recreational Area and cannot be developed. As such, we will never become another Myrtle or Nags Head either. Why do you think we live here? Why do you think folks from all over the world come here? Apparently you, at least, never have. C'mon down, look me up, I not hard to find..Buxton is a tiny place. I'll show you what stewardship of what is probobly the most dynamic beach system on the planet means. You'll be amazed.

Steward?

Pathfinder01 (I guess that is your SUV name?) You say that God made man the steward of all animals? The last time I checked a Steward meant someone that was a "caretaker". Do you think Jesus would be a beach driver or appreciate the National Seashore for its wild and natural beauty?

Hey folks! Mad because you can't drive on the beach? Go spend your money in Myrtle! While I have no doubt there will be a short term effect on merchants, people don't visit the Outer Banks because it looks like Myrtle.
The less people who want the beach to be 60 miles of strip malls and outlet malls the better off it will be in the future (if it is still above water..)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox