Hampton Roads, VA - 11/08/2009
Clear55°Clear
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Opponents of uranium mine find allies at the Beach

Posted to: Christina Nuckols Opinion

Christina Nuckols
Virginian-Pilot op-ed columnist
Read Articles


Deborah and Phillip Lovelace felt like they were going up against an army as they organized opposition to a proposed uranium mine five miles from their cattle farm near Gretna, a Southside town of 1,300.

Then the Virginia Beach City Council passed a resolution opposing the mine without guarantees that the operation wouldn't contaminate Lake Gaston, its primary drinking water supply.

Suddenly, the Lovelaces had their own army: a city of 425,000 people. "I could have almost turned cartwheels," Phillip said.

"People now realize, 'Hey, maybe it's not just little Gretna, Va.,' " Deborah added. "It's going to affect a lot more people."

The Lovelaces are among 10 Gretna residents traveling to Hampton Roads Wednesday for a 7:30 p.m. meeting at Emmanuel Episcopal Church on Princess Anne Road. Officials from the Beach and Norfolk have been invited, and the event is open to the public.

The Lovelaces say they hope to get moral support and meet people with environmental expertise to aid their cause.

While the event is likely to attract mostly passionate opponents of mining, it's being organized by the Virginia Interfaith Center and Tidewater Sowers of Justice, two faith-based groups that aren't exactly in the rabble-rousing business.

The professorial Del. Joe Bouchard will lead the discussion, and he admits his audience may not like everything he says. The Democrat supports a controversial state study on the impact of uranium mining in Virginia as long as it's done by the respected National Academy of Sciences and is not influenced by mining companies.

"If you do it right, it's going to shed light on what the dangers really are," he said.

While a county zoning board might be swayed by crowds of angry people, state regulatory boards will base their decisions on scientific analysis, Bouchard said.

A former Montanan, Bouchard is familiar with the health and environmental destruction uranium mining can cause. New technologies have been developed to minimize mining impacts in arid climates, but he's unsure whether they will work in Virginia with its heavy rains and interconnected groundwater systems.

Bouchard hopes the meeting will help constituents and city leaders start thinking strategically about energy issues. Virginia Beach finds itself on the front lines of the debates. Many of the options could benefit the city, but they also carry risks.

A proposed coal-fired power plant in Surry County would release greenhouses gases and add pollutants to the Chesapeake Bay. Offshore drilling and wind farms raise questions about impacts on the environment and military operations. Nuclear energy is the quickest way to reduce greenhouses gases, but it requires uranium for fuel.

"If Virginia Beach degenerates into a situation where they just say no to everything, people will stop listening to them," Bouchard said. "There's a rational way to approach this and, that's what I'll be advocating."

Christina Nuckols is an editorial writer for The Virginian-Pilot. E-mail her at christina.nuckols@pilotonline.com.

 



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

SPREADING IGNORANCE

Both the Lovelaces and Virginia Beach City Council should do their homework before so ardently opposing a project that will bring millions in business and tax revenue to Virginia. It's almost funny that VB council is worried about contamination from a mine 200 miles away (which borders on impossible, given current technology), but doesn't worry about the uranium under their feet and in just about all building materials. They don't worry about all the tanks full of chemicals and ships carrying them in and out every day, all of which would cause far more injury and death in an accident that all of the uranium tailings in that mine. For such a well educated group of people, they are perpetuating a lot of ignorance. And maybe the Lovelaces don't care if their neighbors get jobs from the Coles Hill Project, but I'll bet others in the area differ.

I think that it is prudent

I think that it is prudent to ensure that safety is paramount with any mining operation but especially with uranium. However, I am of the belief that nuclear power is one (but not the only) way that we can become energy self sufficient and take care of the green house gasses. If this uranium could be mined safely, it could help fuel us for decades if not centurys. However, I am a realist and know that with the people in charge in Washington right now, nuclear power has about as much chance of expansion in the US as the possibility of PETA having a pig roast at their next company picnic.

Va Beach Mining Opponents

While the Lovelaces are tireless and ardent opponents of the proposed uranium mine in Pittsylvania Co, they were not involved in the efforts that prompted the City of VA Beach to pass its anti-mining resolution.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Christina Nuckols Stories

More Opinion Stories

More articles from: Christina Nuckols rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox