Port plan offers millions upfront, billions down road

Posted to: Business

NORFOLK

A Chicago-area developer’s bid to take over the operation of the Virginia Port Authority’s terminals includes some juicy financial carrots for the cash-strapped state .

There’s a $500 million upfront cash payment. Then there’s the $4 billion the proposal would free up for other state transportation projects over the next 60 years. And finally it could include $1.3 billion to pay for a proposed new cargo terminal at Craney Island in Portsmouth.

These and other details about the bid by CenterPoint Properties Trust, based in Oak Brook, Ill., were released Friday by state officials after they completed a technical review to assure that the bid met the requirements of the state’s public-private partnership law. The bid had been a closely held secret since CenterPoint delivered it to Secretary of Transportation Pierce Homer on March 12.

CenterPoint values the proposal at $3.5 billion in today’s dollars, but $8.9 billion over the 60-year life of the deal. That value includes:

-The $500 million payment;

-The $4 billion from returning the state’s annual subsidy of port capital projects, which totaled $36 million in 2008 and is funded by a share of the Commonwealth Transportation Trust Fund;

-$987 million in annual payments to the Port Authority, starting at $7 million a year, to cover its expenses and fund the Port Authority Police and other security measures;

-$440 million in potential profit sharing from port operations after CenterPoint’s expenses are paid and it receives a minimum return;

-$615 million in payments to host communities, starting at $5 million a year (the mayors of Norfolk and Portsmouth have already called the amount offered their cities inadequate);

-$1.02 billion for future capital improvements to the port’s existing facilities;

-The right to develop a fourth state marine cargo terminal at Craney Island, and CenterPoint would invest $1.3 billion there.

The state released the bid late Friday by posting it on the Virginia Port Authority’s Web site. The release starts the clock for other potential port operating firms to submit competing bids.

The authority said in a statement Friday that it “will accept for simultaneous consideration any competing and compliant proposals it receives in its Norfolk office” by 10 a.m. July 27.

State transportation officials referred questions about CenterPoint’s proposal to the Port Authority, but John G. Milliken, chairman of the authority’s Board of Commissioners, said there was little he could say.

“I don’t intend to comment on the substance of the proposal,” he said. “Now that a competitive process is started, it is not appropriate to have any comment on the merit or substance of any of the proposals.”

Asked whether he knew of any other proposals , Milliken said he didn’t but added, “I wouldn’t comment if I had.”

CenterPoint’s bid involves its acquisition of Virginia International Terminals Inc., or VIT, a nonprofit corporation set up by the Virginia Port Authority in 1981 to operate the state-owned marine terminals.

Today, VIT manages Norfolk International Terminals, Portsmouth Marine Terminal and Newport News Marine Terminal, as well as the Virginia Inland Port in Front Royal.

Under the proposal, CenterPoint would control those four facilities as well as the planned Craney Island terminal.

The plan would call for VIT and the Port Authority to “continue in their traditional management and oversight roles, keeping maritime relationships in place,” according to a CenterPoint prepared statement.

“We’ve put a lot of work into our proposal and believe that we bring a lot to the table that others can’t,” said Paul Fisher, CenterPoint’s president, during a teleconference Friday. “So we’re optimistic that the commonwealth and the public will find our proposed partnership the best way forward for the port and the commonwealth to maximize the benefit of your wonderful port facilities.”

Established in 1984, CenterPoint develops, owns and manages industrial real estate and related rail, road and port infrastructure, primarily in the Midwest.

In January, the Suffolk City Council approved CenterPoint’s application to build a 900-plus-acre “intermodal center” in the city. Featuring 13 warehouses with about 5.8 million square feet of space to be built over the next decade, the center will be about 20 miles from port terminals on U.S. 58, west of downtown.

The Suffolk project is one of an array of similar CenterPoint sites in places such as Savannah, Ga.; Manteca, Calif., near Oakland; Houston; and Joliet, Ill., near Chicago.

CenterPoint was acquired in March 2006 by CalEast Global Logistics LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, or Cal-PERS, the nation’s largest pension fund, with more than $260 billion in assets.

For the next four months, the state will seek competing proposals to the one filed by CenterPoint, in accordance with Virginia’s Public-Private Transportation Act.

An independent review panel will be appointed to study all of the proposals submitted. The panel would recommend to the authority’s board which, if any, of the proposals to move forward with and then more detailed, committed proposals would be requested.

“It is a long, important public process in which all affected interests have a chance to have their say,” Milliken said Tuesday at a meeting of the port authority’s Board of Commissioners. “These things are, by their nature, complex and difficult, and it’s not going to be over quickly.”

 

Robert McCabe, (757) 446-2327, robert.mccabe@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Mike Barrett

Did you really mean "quote" or 'quite'?

Pure and simple

Dr. Tabor just does not get it at all. SPSA actually does work; it is the method of cost allocation that is broken. Fact is, the average tip fee is quote reasonable; problem is, no one pays the average fee. But as a measure of the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization in disposing of the region's solid waste, it measures up quite well. In fact, a recent study by SCS sponsored by the area's Chief Administrative Officers, concluded that the least expensive method of disposing of the region's municipal waste was to continue with a modified regional system. So all this howling from Chesapeake citizens who don't like the contract their city council signed when SPSA was created has one simple and obvious objective; to get others to pay for their commitments. Pure and so simple that even Dr. Tabor should be able to understand.

Pure and simple

Dr. Tabor just does not get it at all. SPSA actually does work; it is the method of cost allocation that is broken. Fact is, the average tip fee is quote reasonable; problem is, no one pays the average fee. But as a measure of the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization in disposing of the region's solid waste, it measures up quite well. In fact, a recent study by SCS sponsored by the area's Chief Administrative Officers, concluded that the least expensive method of disposing of the region's municipal waste was to continue with a modified regional system. So all this howling from Chesapeake citizens who don't like the contract their city council signed when SPSA was created has one simple and obvious objective; to get others to pay for their commitments. Pure and so simple that even Dr. Tabor should be able to understand.

Pure and simple

Dr. Tabor just does not get it at all. SPSA actually does work; it is the method of cost allocation that is broken. Fact is, the average tip fee is quote reasonable; problem is, no one pays the average fee. But as a measure of the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization in disposing of the region's solid waste, it measures up quite well. In fact, a recent study by SCS sponsored by the area's Chief Administrative Officers, concluded that the least expensive method of disposing of the region's municipal waste was to continue with a modified regional system. So all this howling from Chesapeake citizens who don't like the contract their city council signed when SPSA was created has one simple and obvious objective; to get others to pay for their commitments. Pure and so simple that even Dr. Tabor should be able to understand.

Sounds like a good idea

Basically the government should absolutely never do anything that can be done privately. The reason is there is no motivation to do it better, because they can simply increase our taxes and throw us in jail if we don't pay up.

Ports

If it sounds too good to be true....it probably is!

Waddayagonnado 'bout...

Too many trucks on Hampton Blvd.?

Pending Port Disaster

CenterPoint has no experience running a port facility. None. If Port Operations were easy - everyone would be doing it. Follow the Money! (To Richmond.)

This deal stinks

But it doesn't matter what any of us say, our input means nothing. So I imput nothing. Too bad our own cities and state can not do this instead of the state retirement system of CA.

My say.

If I could say three words to the state on this matter, they woud be, "Don't do it!" It seems that almost every time that a company throws dollar bill figures around, the money appears to be a smokescreen that is attempting to cover up something more hideous than whatever good deeds that those dollars could buy. For some reason (I'll reserve judgement at this time), politicians are quick to sell out when dollars bills are used as enticements. Also, port shipments can be expected to drop with the waning economy, and state control at this time would probably better serve the community than that of a private enterprise whose primary motive is profit. And let's not forget about security and regulatory control which can be better implemented if the port operations are under government control rather than just government oversight.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed   



Toolbox