82°
forecast

Teens may catch criminal record for fishing in closed beach

Posted to: News North Carolina

Mike Ascher hired a charter boat as a birthday treat for his son John and three friends. The young men had opted not to spend spring break in Mexico, so Ascher wanted them to have a great time on the quieter Outer Banks.

The good time turned into trouble last Thursday morning for John Ascher, 18, and a 17-year-old friend. They returned to their St. Paul, Minn.- area home facing either a hefty fine and a federal criminal record, or an expensive fight in federal court.

Mike Ascher said he is encouraging his son to fight the violation that a National Park Service ranger issued to him for entering a closed section of beach.

The concern is not so much paying the $150 ticket, he said. It's how the offense could look on, say, a future graduate-school application.

"Those kids did nothing wrong intentionally," Ascher said. "God bless them, they're city kids. They don't do any fishing or boating. They didn't knowingly go in there."

Ascher said his family has visited its Colington vacation home regularly from Minnesota for the past 12 years.

The teens were cited for entering a pre-nesting area on a beach off the pond on the northeast side of Oregon Inlet.

It is one of the closures in Cape Hatteras National Seashore established this month to protect anticipated shorebird nesting grounds.

Marked by signs, the closure was required as part of a court-sanctioned agreement regulating off-road vehicle use that was signed in April.

Reese Stecher said the teens were fishing for puppy drum off his 22-foot vessel Beach Bum when he saw the fish congregated in the warmer shallows at the northeast corner of the pond, a pool of water behind the Bodie Island spit.

"We were too far to get a cast to them," Stecher said.

He jokingly commented that it was too bad it was so cold, because they could wade in and chase them out.

"These kids laughed," he recalled. "They said, 'We were in the ocean yesterday. We're from Minnesota!' They went in there in their boxer shorts."

After wading through the 49-degree water, the two young men went up onto the sand bank to fish.

While there, Stecher said, they briefly strayed into the closed area behind the signs, leaving a few footprints on the wrong side.

At the appearance of the ranger, Stecher said, he waded to shore.

When he realized that John Ascher and his friend were being ticketed, the charter captain asked the ranger to write him the ticket, instead.

"Technically, it's my fault, because I didn't warn them," Stecher said.

The signs had seemed far enough away from the water, he said, and it did not appear that they would get near the enclosures.

Stecher said he later declined to accept the $350 payment for the half-day trip.

Stecher said they were treated "like common criminals" and that the ranger should have used more discretion.

"These were the most well-behaved kids," he said. "They were the last kids on the planet who should have been issued tickets."

Acting Chief Ranger Paul Stevens said that if rangers judged violations on the basis of claims of unintentional actions, "probably 40 percent" of them would not be issued.

Stevens said rangers can respond in various ways after observing a violation, including issuing a warning, except for action mandated in the court agreement.

For whatever reason, Stevens said, the ranger felt the violation by the Minnesota party warranted citations.

"Once a violation is issued," he said, "it's out of our hands."

Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Missed the memo

I must have missed the memo. When did the always courteous, smiling, helpful, and proud park rangers, whom I once admired greatly, get shanghaied and reassigned to the enforcement division for the environmental extremist movement. And why is this piping plover bird afforded more freedom, attention, and courtesy in this national recreational park than the park visitors who actually pay for the park with their tax dollars.

really?

Do people really expect not to face legal consequences because they didn't mean to do it? I wish the officers that have given me speeding tickets over the year had this same attitude. And really, the truth is there were signs there and anyone going into the closure has to step over a rope. Maybe they should have gotten a warning, who knows . . . oh that's right, none of us, because we weren't there. It's a pain, but it is very unlikely, if these young people don't have records, that they will actually be convicted of the felony charge anyway. And what if it was a group of 20-something guys. Would everyone be outraged? What about people in their 30s? Is there some sort of age limit that makes it not-okay to violate the closure?

Bull

The Ranger probably could tell they were from out of town and figured they wouldn't want to come back to fight the citation.

Captain, First Class

Captain Strecher, you showed a lot of class when you waived your charter fee. The kids can pay the ticket, and not be out any more money than they had budgeted for the trip. That's the way OBX'ers want to be remembered by tourists in this tight economy. Next time the Aschers visit maybe the Chief Ranger will have reassigned his ticket writing subordinate to the Yogi & Boo-Boo "pin-a-nic" basket theft ring. Poor judgement at it's best.

I believe this ranger abused

I believe this ranger abused his authority in this situation. A warning should have been suffice.

"Acting Chief Ranger Paul

"Acting Chief Ranger Paul Stevens said that if rangers judged violations on the basis of claims of unintentional actions, "probably 40 percent" of them would not be issued."

If the violations were clearly unintentional, then the citation should not have been issued. These kids came from a boat and the signs were out of sight. And law enforcement officials wonder why we are loosing respect for the law.

hmm

doesn't this belong in the editorial section?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox