82°
forecast

Waterside shooting was self-defense, accused says

Posted to: Crime News Norfolk Waterside

NORFOLK

The man charged with murder in a shooting death at the Waterside parking garage last weekend fired in self-defense after seeing a gun on the driver who fought him after a fender bender, a defense lawyer said in court Friday.

Reginald E. Royals Jr., 24, the man accused in the incident that left Juan Carlos Ovalle dead and another man injured, must remain in jail without bond, a judge ruled.

Both the Ovalle and Royals families watched the proceedings in General District Court. Statements from both families painted pictures of the victim and the accused as hard working family men who had never been in trouble until a dispute over scratches on a car led to gunfire.

Royals' lawyer, Jeffrey Swartz, said his client was by himself in the parking garage when his car bumped Ovalle's.

The four people in Ovalle's car all got out, Swartz said. Royals gave his phone number, and someone in Ovalle's car immediately called it to verify it was the correct number. Someone in Ovalle's car took a picture of Royals' license plate, Swartz said.

That's when Ovalle's friend Marcus McGee said Royals "probably doesn't have insurance. He's not going to pay," Swartz said.

"Royals saw the victim had a gun in his pocket. He saw it because he displayed it," Swartz said, reaching toward his waist and motioning as if to hike up his shirt to display his waistband.

All the men headed back to their cars, Swartz said, but then Royals saw Ovalle and McGee coming toward him. The men fought, Swartz said, with Ovalle and McGee striking Royals. That's when Royals reached into his car, got his own gun and started shooting.

Ovalle was fatally shot in the head. McGee was shot several times and had wounds to his chest and a leg. He survived.

Swartz said Royals' car was on the fourth floor of the garage; he had seen police on the second floor on his way up. Royals drove straight to the police, turned himself in, and gave a statement.

"It was only because he was in fear of his life that he pulled a gun and shot," Swartz said. "He cooperated with the police in every way he could."

Prosecutor Val Bowen told Judge Ray Dezern that Ovalle did have a gun when he first got out of his car but had placed it in the console before confronting Royals a second time.

"The victims were unarmed " when they were shot, Bowen said. "It was a fist fight. If he was so afraid, why would he turn his back to go into the car and get a gun?"

Bowen said Royals told police that he believed he saw Ovalle reach for a gun during the fight. McGee did not have a gun, Bowen said.

Bowen told Dezern that police found two holsters and 9 mm cartridges in Royals' car. Police also took a gun from Royals.

Bowen said Royals had no criminal record.

Royals' friends and family members filled two rows of benches in the courtroom. His mother and sister testified as to his character. His sister, Tamara Wilson, said Royals has worked as an electrician with Northrop Grumman for three years, and that his foreman has promised that his job remains available if he is released from jail.

His mother, Jacquelyn Royals, said she taught her children that if they were picked on, to walk away, tell a teacher, tell a principal.

"Reggie, he would run from trouble," she said. "He was never violent."

She said her son graduated from high school in 2002 with an advanced studies degree and was most valuable player in his baseball league. He attended Virginia State University for three years to study electrical engineering but left when his maternal grandmother died.

"I begged Reggie not to drop out of school, but he wanted to drop out to get a job to help me at home," she said.

 

Michelle Washington, (757) 446-2287, michelle.washington@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

thanks, joshk_in_vb,

"The common consensus is that you are required to make every effort to leave the situation before resorting to use of deadly force."
That was my original point before we were sidetracked.

Hey now! I happen to know a

Hey now! I happen to know a couple of halfway desent people from Carolina. I don't mind if they visit our state at all...vist only though, lol

Jermflux, Shhhhhhhh

If that idea gets out they'll try it at our southern border! But thanks for the tip.

George

The trick is to impale the squirrel with a stake like Vlad the Impaler and display it among your carrots as a warning to all other invaders. That way one only one squirrel dies so many carrots may live.

Beautiful day today!

Got lots of gardening done. I would like to know is shooting squirrels a form of self defense. They're after my carrots! How long would I have to wait to cap one of those thugs. Do they actually have to have pulled up the carrot first. Or,can I just shoot them out of the tree? They're my carrots. They're my babies! My carrots are me.

I was wrong, too.

I told George K., "I believe that you'd rather drink hemlock than admit when your wrong."

"your wrong". A typo! Man, I hate it when that happens!

I was wrong!

The Florida law was passed in 2005 and was the first. Several other states have followed. I do not recall Virgina doing so.

George K

No, George, there is nothing in the law in Virginia that says when deadly force is authorized. All there is is case law. The common consensus is that you are required to make every effort to leave the situation before resorting to use of deadly force. Unfortunately, this person could not leave the scene without breaking the law by doing so. Without exchanging information and agreeing that the police were not needed by either of them, the other party could have called the police and had the other changed with leaving the scene of an accident. It's kind of a catch-22. The guy might have had a weapon during the first altercation, but he didn't have one at the altercation when he was shot. After seeing the weapon the first time, he should have left and sough out the first available police officer. As it turns out, there was a police officer 2 floors below.
But back to my original point, there is no real law, only case law to cover self-defense.

proud native

Please tell me why Ryan Frederick is jail? He shot in self defense.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox