A decade after fatal N.C. crash, emotions remain strong

Posted to: News North Carolina

KILL DEVIL HILLS, N.C.

Melissa Marvin's dog Trixie waited in the red Mitsubishi Montero while her owner stopped around noon April 6, 1999, at a bar in Nags Head and drank two margaritas. About an hour later, Marvin drove to a bar in Kill Devil Hills and consumed three shots of 100-proof alcohol.

Around 2:50 p.m., Marvin, her left leg propped on the dashboard, weaved through traffic on U.S. 158 about 60 mph, heading to Williamsburg for a concert. At the intersection of Ocean Bay Boulevard, Marvin ran a red light and slammed into a Chevrolet Cavalier filled with five 17-year-olds.

Megan Blong, Angela McGrady and Amanda Geiger of Medford, N.J., were killed immediately. Shana Lawler, of Colington, N.C., died six days later. Michael Horner, also from Medford, was critically injured.

"It seems like 10 years was a lifetime ago," said Erin Lawler, Shana's oldest sister. "In the same breath, it's like 10 minutes ago."

The Lawlers had moved from New Jersey to the Outer Banks in August 1998, she said, and the four friends were visiting Shana.

Lawler, today an addictions counselor in Tabernacle, N.J., said no family members - her parents now live in Virginia - were able to attend a brief service Monday at the location of the crash, where four crosses and flowers memorialize the girls. But the hope is that their deaths have spurred awareness of the consequences of drunken driving.

"When people pass by those crosses," she said, "unfortunately, it's a daily reminder of what could happen if you don't make the right decision."

Tests 4-1/2 hours after the crash revealed that Marvin had a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.21, making her level an estimated 0.28 when she had hit the teens, nearly four times the legal limit for driving. After the wreck, witnesses said Marvin repeatedly asked about her dog, which survived.

Marvin, then a 29-year-old waitress and amateur surfer, was charged with four counts of second-degree murder and one count of assault with a deadly weapon inflicting serious injury. In a gripping trial in January 2000 that attracted national media attention, including from Court TV, evidence was presented that Marvin was arrested twice before and accused of drinking while driving, but the charges had been reduced to reckless driving.

"It was the most stressful six days of my life," said Elizabeth City attorney Michael Sanders, who represented Marvin. "From Monday to Saturday, I couldn't eat."

When Superior Court Judge Jerry Tillett sentenced Marvin to 15 years for each fatality, to be served consecutively, people were stunned when they did the math: 60 years. Tillett said he wanted to recognize the individual value of each of the lost lives.

Sanders said DWI murder cases were unusual in that part of the state but that the sentence was more unusual.

"In a vehicular case, when you didn't have a particular intent to kill anybody," he said, "I've never heard of a DWI sentence that long."

Robert Trivette, today a private attorney in Southern Shores, was one of two assistant district attorneys who prosecuted the case. He said he believes the attention the case received probably saved lives by serving as a deterrent. The case also factored in subsequent legislative improvements in prosecuting fatal DWIs.

But Trivette said the case was tragic all around, including for Marvin.

"It was the most traumatic case I ever prosecuted," he said. "It was just very emotional."

The case inflamed the community, evoking sympathy for the victims but also for Marvin. For many people who lived and worked in a resort area, serving and drinking alcohol was part of everyday life. Whispers about "there but for the grace of God go I" were heard alongside the grief expressed about the horrific loss of life.

Lawler said it's difficult to say if justice has been served by the sentence.

"Not only were the lives of four girls lost, but Melissa's mother also lost her daughter," she said. She knows, though, that its severity made an impact.

"If this was given across the board consistently, I can guarantee there would be less crosses along the highway."

 

Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

It's time to come down

It's time to come down already.

Just a technicality, but . . .

If Marvin was plastered, who told us that her left leg was propped on the dashboard as she drove???

marym63204

Many people saw her driving this way weaving in and out of traffic. People were horrified to see her erratic driving and her leg hanging out of the window. So sad.

Jail and drinking and all of the above

I play music in the Hampton Roads area, and recently met a 21-year-old who was boasting about how much she had to drink that night, and how she was going to drive home anyway. She said she did it all the time, and thought it was okay.
There are plenty of people that drink way too much, then drive.
I don't know what the answer is.
If sixty years in jail doesn't sound scary, what does?
How does Ms. Marvin feel about all this now? Her life must be hell, and she is paying, and it is awful for everyone who was involved.
It would be a hell of a story if the reporter followed up with Melissa Marvin.

I agree with JenH, what happend to Michael.

Great question. Gotta agree with Russ also. Think about it, if offenders were sentenced to no less than six months for a DUI without an accident or hurting anyone on the first time, then how many repeat offenders would there be. Then if convicted of a second DUI, lock them away for five years minimum. If they cause an accident a minimum of ten years and if someone is injured a minimum twenty years. Can you imagine how much of a drop in offenders there would be? The sentences are more than just punishment for the offenders, they are for a deterrent to keep others from doing the same offense. Of course first we need to take the fun and relaxation out of the prisons. NO weight rooms, NO tv, NO radio, NO computer, NO sports, NO recreation, NO phone and bring back voluntary hard labor to give them something to do. Maybe then prison life will be so bad no one would want to do anything to have to go back

Jen H

Great question! that would be interesting to know.

Survivor

Does anyone know what became of Michael, the lone survivor of the crash?

DUI fatalities = Murder

With all of the information available about drinking and driving when someone drinks to excess and then makes the decision to get behind the wheel if they hit someone they have committed murder just as surely as if they fired a loaded gun into a crowd. Maybe the bullet hits someone and maybe it doesnt. But if it does then you are a murderer. I have worked in EMS for many years in this area and get sick of seeing slobbering drunks we pull out of wrecks after killing someone then show up in court neat and clean with family behind them only to be found guilty of involuntary manslaughter if even that. Usually they get at most 10 years. Go take a look at your loved ones and tell me they are worth only 10 years to a person that took them away from you. These people should be found guilty of murder and locked away for life.

Until we see DUI fatalities for what they are, murder, and sentence them accordingly we will always have articles like this one.

Melissa Marvin

A horrible tragedy, I feel so sorry for the families of those who were killed. HOWEVER, I also think that without any questions, her sentence was OUTRAGEOUS. It needs to be looked into by NC, and reduced NOW

Wow

Come on people get over yourselves. It is what it is. We can not change it. The law is the law they are the ones that enforce it where they see fit. What are you going to do? Stand up in court and tell them "hey that's not fair" they certainly got the message across. As far as the crosses in the median. What is it hurting? Is it interfering with your driving? If it is a distraction then maybe you shouldn't be driving. There are much more distracting things on the road than this. Come on you have got to be kidding me. I can not believe that you people are so concerned over some crosses.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox


special features