81°
forecast

Drug courts save lives and money

Posted to: Editorials Opinion Virginia

A national study on prison populations revealed last week that proportionately fewer black offenders are in prison for drug-related crimes than at any time in 20 years. The study by The Sentencing Project found a 22 percent drop in the number of blacks in state prisons between 1999 and 2005 for drug offenses but a 43 percent increase in the number of whites in state prisons for the same crimes.

What does it mean?

It certainly doesn't mean that there's been an end to the lingering disparity in punishment for drug crimes.

Black Americans make up 12 percent of the U.S. population and somewhere between 30 percent and 35 percent of those cited for drug violations, according to the FBI's Uniform Crime Report. But blacks represent 44 percent of those in prison for drug-related crimes.

Criminal justice experts point to two reasons for the racial shift in prison populations in the past decade. First, police are spending much more time enforcing laws against methamphetamine, used more by white Americans than blacks. Second, the proliferation of drug courts in urban areas has put many black drug offenders in treatment - and recovery - instead of prison.

The effectiveness of drug courts, both in reducing crime and in saving money, argues for even more intervention to break the cycle of drug abuse and incarceration, particularly now, when states are being forced to build more prisons or free some inmates.

Virginia spends nearly $25,000 a year to keep an inmate locked up. By comparison, its 28 drug courts spend on average about one-tenth that per participant. Half the programs are run with federal or state money; others rely on communities to pay the expenses.

The courts, including those in Hampton Roads - Norfolk, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Chesapeake, Hampton and Newport News - help addicts with nonviolent charges into rehabilitation. Participants are required to submit to tests, attend court weekly, find a job, undergo extensive treatment and counseling, and pay fines, child support and restitution.

It typically takes between a year and 18 months to complete the program, but once they overcome their addictions, the participants have a better chance of finding and keeping a job and a better chance of staying out of trouble.

Conversely, drug addiction, left untreated, often leads to other crimes. It's one of the main reasons children end up in foster care, and one of the main reasons inmates - black and white - are behind bars.

So the good news in the study is not so much that America is incarcerating more of one race and less of another, but that something is working to reduce drug abuse in urban areas, and that it costs far less than the alternative.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Really??

"Conversely, drug addiction, left untreated, often leads to other crimes."

I fully agree that using drugs is a bad choice, and that drug courts are a better choice that simple incarceration in dealing with addiction, but that statement confuses cause and effect.

It is drug prohibition that results in addiction leading to other crimes. Were drugs legal, available, and cheap, no one would need to commit crimes to support their addiction, nor would there be sufficient profit margin in supplying them to support criminal enterprises.

Addiction does lead to great social harm, broken families, and ruined lives, but the criminality involved in buying and selling drugs is the certain economic consequence of prohibition. In any business, legal or not, prices and profit margins are proportionate to risk. The more law enforcement raises the risks, the greater the prices and profits. The war on drugs is not winable through law enforcement.

addiction

drug addiction treatment is very complicated and i think you need faith and you can find it to Christian based drug rehab, that really can help you to gain self confidence and to pass over the addiction.

Just what exactly are you using?

In 1914, when the first federal drug law was enacted, the government estimated 1.3 percent of the population were addicted to illegal drugs. In 1970, when the War on Drugs began, the government estimated 1.3 percent of the population were addicted to illegal drugs. Thirty-nine million arrests later the government says 1.3 percent are addicted to illegal drugs.
http://www.leap.cc/cms/index.php

you must be wrong

Conversely, drug addiction, left untreated, often leads to other crimes.

People around here will tell you that drugs don't hurt anyone...

Try something...

Sounds like a good idea. The present war on drugs isn't working.

Drog rehab

In my opinion more teenagers will be addicted to drugs.The number one organization against consumer drugs is drug rehab Utah they are a professional team who help everyone in this situation

I agree with drug

I agree with drug courts…it save lives, even with the legalization of marijuana or some other drugs, but what about trying to cure them? Have you ever tried some clinics, like www.drug-rehab.org ? only a comprehensive drug rehab program will teach new life skills to ensure that each participant can succeed in life after treatment.let's try to save them too, not only to make it legal.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners