The Virginian-Pilot
©
PORTSMOUTH
Five years ago, city leaders declared they wanted Portsmouth to have one of the region's lowest real estate tax rates by 2025.
Since then, the City Council has steadily decreased the city's rate, from $1.45 per $100 of assessed value in 2004 to $1.21 in the current budget year.
Although double-digit increases in residential assessments means residents haven't seen financial relief, council members have lauded their ability to bring Portsmouth's rate to the lowest point in more than two decades.
So when City Manager Kenneth Chandler proposed an 8-cent property tax increase for the coming budget year, it struck some as a reversal for a city that still has the highest real estate tax rate in South Hampton Roads.
Council members said their philosophy hasn't changed. Many said they are doing all they can to keep the rate at $1.21 and avoid a rate hike this year, despite the recession.
"These are completely different times than any of us have ever seen," Councilwoman Elizabeth Psimas said.
The city manager did not have many places to go for money to balance the budget, she added.
Each penny on the real estate tax rate generates roughly $700,000 for the city.
"There are not but so many things he can tweak," Psimas said. "And the revenue projections are lower, so where are you going to go?"
Two things she and other council members said they know the City Council will not do: dip further into Portsmouth's rainy day fund or back off a $2.3 million public safety retention plan.
"I am going to do everything I can to keep the real estate tax rate at $1.21. I am absolutely committed to the public safety pay plan; that is the No. 1 priority for me," Councilman Doug Smith said.
The plan, which would address salary inequities and bring Portsmouth's sworn police officers and firefighters in line with the regional average, is the only thing Psimas said she'd be willing to raise taxes to fund.
She said 3 cents' worth of the 8-cent increase Chandler proposed March 31 is already off the table. That tax increase would have offset increases in residential trash collection fees.
Portsmouth's trash tipping fee is set to increase in July to $170 per ton from $104 per ton under a plan to bail out the regional trash authority.
With that $2.1 million off the table, city leaders now need to find $3.5 million to keep the tax rate at $1.21.
"We need to overturn every stone in seeking to keep it at the level where it is," Vice Mayor Bill Moody Jr. said of the tax rate. "I think if we could keep it where it is, that would be a victory. Our citizens can't afford it."
Moody said he thinks the city is still trying to conduct business as if it were before the recession.
Portsmouth's revenue from the state and from other taxes, such as retail sales and personal property tax, have been severely reduced, Moody said.
He said he thinks it's important to hear from citizens which services they value and which they would be willing to sacrifice to keep the city's tax rate down.
Psimas envisioned city leaders would reach the $3.5 million through some combination of savings. Council members are still discussing options.
But Councilman Charles B. Whitehurst Sr. said he doesn't think the city manager has yet provided council members enough options to cut expenses.
"He hasn't given us opportunities to make a decision," Whitehurst said.
Decisions about employee furloughs, for example, should be up to council members, he said.
The City Council is scheduled to vote on the budget May 12.
Jen McCaffery, (757) 446-2627, jen.mccaffery@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
assessor and city council are too chummy
I agree 100% with the post suggesting the assessor's office should be investigated--city council too, for that mattter ! There is no way that assessments shouldn't have changed this year when every other city reported decreases. It doesn't take a real estate expert to figure that out. My guess is city council "suggested" to the assessor that assessments should not go down or they may be forced to reverse their pledge to have the lowest tax rate in the region....so let's work together now !
I'm watching the council work sesson
Now and I see no mention of cutting funds for the sacred cow called Social Services. As long as Portsmouth continues to fund welfare like there was no limit to money Portsmouth will continue on the path to imploding from within.
Tax increases
Cuffee-Glenn. Sorry for the misprint
Tax increases
There is an article about Suffolk and the City Manager looking at every little thing such as using every drop of ink in a pen, cell phones, uniforms for people that really dont need them, and so forth. This is a City manager dedicated to finding every bit of non essential use of money(abusive spending) in their city to keep from raising the taxes of the citizens of Suffolk. What is up with Portsmouths city manager. We havent heard of anything like this being done. Maybe Mr Chandler and the other 3 assistant city managers in Portsmouth have a meeting with City Manager Glenn-Cuffee of Suffolk and learn a little something. Real Estate taxes have decreased in the city but everything else has gone up. Just poor management if you ask me. Time to vote out the mayor and council and get some new people in there that care about us.
Re: Moose
It's pretty easy to rip something apart when you pose straw man arguments. What "upscale" apartments and condos did the city fund or build? I sure haven't seen them. I don't know that the city spent much on office and retail space either. Have you read the budget? It's really simple, you just have to pick something to cut from it, or increase taxes. There isn't some massive line item funding condos or office space.
Entitlement mentality
Personally I'm fed up with city employees and the entitlement mentality. I'm sure that each department could be cut by 15% and the citizens wouldn't even notice a decrease in service. They gripe and whine about furloughs when the citizens paying their salaries are being laid off, not losing one or two days of pay. They accrued vacation and sick days that are just abusive. Many of the clerical positions are over paid compared to their private sector counterparts and certainly their pension and benefit packages are much greater. I've looked at the all the city job sites and the pay for low level clerical and accounting positions are much higher then the private jobs in this area. We have utilities department that doesn't even do its own bill collecting....it goes to some place in Richmond...why are we paying people in downtown, what the heck do they do all day? Its time to face reality and trim the fat in city departments.
R.E.Tax rate just the tip
Of the iceberg. The City plans on raising EVERY fee and rate, water, sewer, storm water management, garbage, and on and on----
Where do council members get off stating that "they've lowered the real estate tax rate every year" over the last few years. Anyone's bill gone down? Nope.
Let's see... where can P-town cut?
OHHH! I know! What about the Holiday Inn site project!? How many millions of city tax payers money is being wasted on what should be a PRIVATE development? It's not part of the cities CORE FUNCTION. Upscale projects at a time when the economy is hurting? That's real bright. More office and retail space, when millions of square feet of office and retail space is setting empty? Real bright. More upscale condos and apartments? Wonderful...at a time of high un-employment in a low income area, yeah, I can see these selling and renting out quick. NOT! What is needed throughout every city in this are is to get rid of these not to bright elected and appointed seats. Then we need to invoke term limits on every seat of public trust and get back to CITIZEN POLITICIANS. Social programs, tax dollar subsidized development and forced charity is not core functions of the government and should not be done with our tax dollars. Get rid of the career politicians and well get rid of the problems.
Everything is fluid
The proposed real estate tax increase is just that a proposal --- I will never believe Mr. Chandler expected to get a 8 cent increase it's way high to make it easier for the city council members look like they are saving tax payers money when they only increase it by 3 or 5 cents. Typical budget practice but it's still stinks. Let's save the city some money --- cut all city departments by 15% each, education and public safety from 2.25% to 3%, do what the city did with teachers salaries -- phase it in over a 2 or 3 year period say 1,150,000 this year and then next. As for services being cut --- not yet save that and possible forloughs for when and only if the current economic status continues. Okay sale Bid-a-wee golf course and use the money to pay down the debt on the golf fund. And increase the fast food sales tax by 1 cent --- it's like smoking an optional thing that people do not have to have. I don't know how much all or some of these things will save but lets get something done now and not have to go through the budget mess we've been in all year trying to balance our cities budget.
dumb, dumb. dumb
increase taxes, foreclosures increase, net revenues go down.....not enlightened "leadership"