69°
forecast

War demands put crimp in Navy's air, sea time

Posted to: Military

Being popular has its price.

The recent surge in global demand for all things Navy has caused the service to burn through its funding more quickly than planned.

As a result, the service is tightening its belt for the rest of the fiscal year, which translates into fewer hours in the air and fewer days at sea.

"At the current rate of operations, if we didn't make adjustments, the fleets would run out of cash," said Lt. Cmdr. Phil Rosi, a spokesman for U.S. Fleet Forces Command in Norfolk.

Ships and planes already on deployment or preparing to deploy will be least affected by the cuts. There are currently about 100 ships deployed worldwide, including four carrier strike groups and their air wings.

The cuts are being driven by recent higher-than-projected expenses, Rosi said. These expenses are because of increased demand from combatant commanders around the world, as well as the increased costs of operations.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are still the Navy's main priorities, along with homeland defense, Rosi said, so they will continue to receive the bulk of funding. Non-deployed planes and ships will bear the brunt of the cuts, though the specifics are still being worked out.

Airplanes will see fewer flight hours, which means less fuel usage and lower maintenance costs. The Navy is also reviewing upcoming participation in air shows and flyovers.

For non-deployed ships, steaming days will be reduced by an average of one third. This means fewer ships will participate in community events such as Fleet Week. Last fiscal year, the Navy did 112 port visits. This year, it's looking to do about 70.

While these are all great ways to showcase the Navy, Rosi said, "the key is to be operational."

What these cuts will mean specifically depends on what you drive.

On the air side of the house, Lt. Cmdr. Joseph Cuba predicts squadrons may be scheduling more simulator time, particularly once Carrier Air Wing 8 returns with the carrier Theodore Roosevelt.

Cuba helps run the F/A-18 Hornet and Super Hornet simulators at Oceana Naval Air Station as part of Strike Fighter Wing Atlantic. He said the simulators are already at capacity since they're primarily used to train new pilots. Two new Super Hornet simulators are coming on line soon, which will handle some of the excess demand.

Cuba said that while pilots can use the simulators to stay sharp, simulator time doesn't count toward many of the requirements they must meet to keep current in their planes.

As the technology gets more sophisticated, the Navy is studying whether, and how, to allow simulators to substitute for cockpit time, he said.

Paul Harris, a retired Tomcat maintenance officer who now works with the simulators, said that while the simulators are useful, "the realism is not there."

The trick is balancing what's live with what's simulated, said Rear Adm. David Anderson, vice commander of U.S. Fleet Forces.

"We look at funding levels and figure out how we can continue to operate safely," he said. "There are red lines we can't go below. We have to make sure everyone knows where the red lines are."

Harris remembers coming back from deployments in the 1980s, and sidelining planes for months to save money. The problem, and expense, came when it was time to get the planes and pilots ready for the next deployment.

The same issue is at hand now, Anderson said.

"We have to say, 'Here's the cost if we park them.' We have to get up to speed again."

When it comes to non-deployed ships, the answer may lie in the Internet - more specifically in fleet "synthetic training."

In a synthetic event, while a ship is tied up at the pier, trainers feed a real-time war game into its displays, communications systems and combat systems. Multiple ships and planes can participate simultaneously from anywhere in the world.

In the past five years, the technology has "gone from Pong to Xbox" in terms of sophistication, said Michael Ogden, assistant chief of staff of synthetic training and technologies with Strike Force Training Atlantic.

The Navy currently uses synthetic training along with live exercises as part of a typical work-up for strike groups and individual ships preparing to deploy, he said. The exercises can run for days at a time and offer scenarios that would be hard to mimic during live training.

To compensate for the loss of time at sea, Ogden said the Navy is looking at ways to do more synthetic training this summer "to keep the muscle memory alive" for the crews of lower-priority ships.

It is too early to know what form the training will take or how many ships will be involved, he said. Since preparing a synthetic event usually requires nine to 12 months, he said it's likely the trainers would adapt part of an existing exercise instead of starting from scratch.

Looking ahead, Rosi couldn't put a number on what it would cost the Navy to resume normal operations, nor say what the service might request in a supplemental request or the 2010 budget, which is due out in about a month. The current fiscal year ends Sept. 30.

"We're not in a position to talk about what may happen in the future," he said. "We will continue to monitor operations throughout the year, and if additional funding comes available, we'll adjust."

Matthew Jones, (757) 446-2949, matthew.jones@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

We all "get it"

We "get" that the Navy has a base they're not using, and it's very dangerous for the residents and pilots. The Navy has allowed Va. Beach to control Oceana. Encroachment is not a new issue, still the jets were based at Oceana (greed), and the Navy had to know they could not provide proper training.
The Navy is really at fault here for endangering these communities. The Navy should move the jets to a more suitable, existing base. This problem was not created by citizens in rural areas (NC or Va), they should not have to change their entire life because the Navy and Va Beach did not plan accordingly.

Not sure you get it. . .

"Yes, pilot training is paramount, and they can get that training by using Oceana as it was intended.
The Navy does not need a second OLF, they need to use Oceana from 11pm - 7am for FCLP.
Think of the savings."

Oceana can't for reasons mentioned on this thread and other sources use the base 24-7. Another reason to move the jets (or remove half) is safety. We have schools and malls all around this area. Do we need another incident where innocent people were killed by a jet (the pilot should get sued as he should have ditched in the ocean) like in California?? It's completely stupid, shortsighted, and totally moronic to have a jet base near a large population. I guess the Navy has a lot of money in the legal fund.

REPLY

"I'd like to see someone put in a smelly sanitation plant close to the home you bought 10 or whatever years ago, and see you feelings on that. If you buy in at 70db of sound and they bring in different aircraft at 80db, then you have fertile grounds for a lawsuit."

They did this w/ the base when I lived in Virginia. And I did sue and win. The money did not make them any quieter. I took my check and moved to the most gloriously quiet community that calls itself 'Currituck.' Now the navy wants to move jets over my head again after paying a hefty price to remove myself from their equation. Now you all want me to suffer w/ you because you cannot man up and solve your own problem? Remember that this is YOUR problem, and not ours. The main thing is that placing an OLF this close to Fentress will not alleviate your problem. Just plain dumb.

Yes, pilot training is

Yes, pilot training is paramount, and they can get that training by using Oceana as it was intended.
The Navy does not need a second OLF, they need to use Oceana from 11pm - 7am for FCLP.
Think of the savings.

You have to be kidding. .

"I empathize w/ the poster below who said he bought his home 26 years ago. But I fail to see how he feels that his problem should become someone elses to lessen his load."

I'd like to see someone put in a smelly sanitation plant close to the home you bought 10 or whatever years ago, and see you feelings on that. If you buy in at 70db of sound and they bring in different aircraft at 80db, then you have fertile grounds for a lawsuit. If the Oceana doesn't like restrictions why don't they get the hell out? Beaufort Marine base was willing to take the jets, so why foot drag?

Cuts backs

I am still in the Navy after 18 years and some of the hog wash that has been written about this article is beyond comprehension. This is what I know for sure. When a bunch of yes men and women get together to make decisions without any solutions, the first words out of their mouth is cut back. What we need to do is look at what is being wasted. For instance, why thrown money at Civilian Employees that do not know their job and why do we keep Contractors on the payroll that under bid contracts to be the lowest bidder and in the end the Navy is stuck with a much larger tab. Yes men and women are why we are in such a bind right now. Yes men and women are not what we need right now Solutions are what we need, not ask the government to print more money.

Oceana OLF solution

Craig AFB Alabama Brac'd in 1976, long runway, and a willing community...less than a hour to the fleet training area.

I empathize w/ the poster

I empathize w/ the poster below who said he bought his home 26 years ago. But I fail to see how he feels that his problem should become someone elses to lessen his load.

Besides, if the direction is NC, most of Hampton Roads will actually be more affected than now. It will simply make the figure 8 patterns larger. It will increase low flights over a much larger area. The proposed OLF in NC is a blink of an eye away from Fentress. Right smack dab on the border of two of the countries fastest growing communities.

Please define dumb idea in three letters of less.

OBAMA CAN

Give it some time and Obama will fix that too.
He is just now preparing to announce he will bail out the Navy too.
He just needs to call the treasury secretary to print more money.
As long as I pay my taxes he will help everybody.
I'm not worried...Obama fixes everything.

Need for OLF and Oceana reuse

is a result increased flying patterns in neighborhoods that were never ever affected when homeowners moved in. These are not right up on the government boundaries. I live in the middle of the two fields (distance) and I am directly affected NOW by the loudness of the jets as each generation is louder plus stop and gos louder. When I bought my home 26 yrs ago, that was a first question .... any any jet noise and of course, it did not exist then...Plus all of the ambient light is not good for practice.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features