The Virginian-Pilot
©
SUFFOLK
The city's former economic development director maintains that she was forced last week to resign or be fired the same day.
Cindy Cave, who left last week after less than seven months into her job, laid out what she called "the real facts" behind her sudden departure in an e-mail to members of the Economic Development Authority board.
City spokeswoman Debbie George responded to a request for comment from City Manager Selena Cuffee-Glenn by writing "We cannot comment on personnel matters."
Cave's statement also raised questions about the viability of a major business deal that Mayor Linda Johnson touted in her State of the City address last month.
Cave said she was "blamed" for the lease between Sparta Composite Products and Denver-based developer ProLog "not being signed & ready to go."
In parenthesis, she added:
"With all due respect, this is a matter between those two business entities. If the Sparta deal falls through, it will not be because of me, but rather due to the economy."
The deal is to include a $13.2 million plant that would create nearly 200 jobs within five years. Gov. Timothy M. Kaine issued a news release about it in March.
Paul Oppenheim, vice president and general manager of Sparta Composite Products in San Diego, Calif., declined to respond to Cave's comment. But he said: "I can assure your readers that our project is still going forward, and nothing has changed as far as our timeline or our plans."
Cave said in her e-mail to EDA board members that she regretted not having time to say goodbye. She said she was providing the facts of her departure because some of them had been asked about it by reporters. Cave provided a copy of the e-mail she sent to the EDA but did not respond to an e-mail requesting further comment Wednesday.
Cave said Deputy City Manager Patrick Roberts and the human resources director visited her at 3:15 p.m. May 21 in her office. Roberts, whom Cave did not identify by name, said "this is not a good fit," Cave wrote.
He cited three issues, including the Sparta project, she said.
"He took offense when I passed along negative feedback to him from disgruntled business/property owners trying to navigate through the City's development process," Cave wrote.
Also, Cave said, Roberts "accused" her of using the budget process to "downsize/demote staff." Cave said she countered that she had presented a department budget with a 10 percent reduction, as requested by City Manager Selena Cuffee-Glenn, but her budget was reduced by 37 percent.
Cave wrote that she was told of no performance concerns during her employment. Cave said she was given two choices: "to resign or be terminated... either of which would result in May 21 being my last day of employment."
Mayor Johnson said Wednesday that she did not know anything about the situation other than that city staff had accepted Cave's resignation late last week.
Asked whether she wanted to know the reasons behind Cave's departure, Johnson responded:
"Do I want to know? As far as wanting to know, it's not really my business. We're not into personnel. We're supposed to be into policy."
Councilman Charles Parr, the council's liaison to the EDA, echoed the sentiment, saying that he hasn't asked why Cave had left and didn't want to know. "That's a personnel matter," he said.
Councilman Robert Barclay said he asked Cuffee-Glenn about it Wednesday and received a "satisfactory explanation," but it wasn't something that he would discuss.
Jim Shirley, a new board member of the Economic Development Authority, said he'd like to know more.
"We probably got quite a bit of money invested in her," he said. "And she's only been here seven months. So what are the circumstances?"
Pilot writer Phil Walzer contributed to this report.
Dave Forster, (757) 222-5563, dave.forster@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Didn't Make The Club
This lady's opinions must not have agreed with the good old boys and girls!!
Yepitsme
Yepitsme - I think you are wrong in this case. This is not a privite company where the boss has the right to tell you to do the job his way or take the highway. This woman works for the people of Suffolk. It appears to me that she took her concerns to those above her on behalf of the people and they didn't like it. She did not(before now)take her concerns to the public or try to embarass her superiors. But she has now because they forced her hand. They tried to sweep her under the rug and it backfired on them. They probably did have the right to let she go - but the reasons they gave are too minor for something else not to be smoldering in that fire. It would be interesting to hear from the City Manager on this, but we probably never will.
Politically incorrect to fire the City Manager?
I ran for Suffolk City Council many years ago because of was upset with the excuse of "we set policy only". It seems that excuse is still hanging in the air. That is nothing more than a diversion from take the actions necessary to make dramatic change when necessary. The city council needs to immediately terminate the city manager and start taking direct responsibility for all of the things that happen under their watch.
Term Limits Term Limits Term Limits
Term limits for every elected position in this country. Starting with the US Senate and House of Representatives. Elected office was never meant to be a career.
NOT SURPRISING SUFFOLK
Yup, The Good Ol Boy Network is alive and well in Suffolk. Matter of fact, its growing. The son's and daughters of the previous Good Ol Boys have now taken over and the RUSH to steal from the Citizens has led to a feeding frenzy.
Anytime anyone says they seek public office because they 'want to serve' (the public)............riiiiiiiiiight ! Self-Serving .
When the Wife of a City Employee ALMOST forces a Resident to SELL THEIR HOUSE AND MOVE because of a barking dog ?
Can you say 'abuse of priviledge' ?
One Formula most of the City Govt uses? Buy land at a pittance THEN get it RE-ZONED and sell @ a mass profit.
To Moose
Moose, I agree with your premise of "If you don't like the way things are now, you have to take a CHANCE on CHANGE and vote out every incumbent that has been in the elected position for two terms." The only problem is the premise is flawed. It doesn't work in Suffolk when city councilmen run unopposed, and they are elected from each borough; yet each one votes on decisions that affect all of Suffolk. When Suffolk has an at large election and allows all citizens to vote for all city council members, then will you see new faces within the city council; and only then will the good old boy chain be broken.
i've seen this before....
and it's usually because insecure and incompetent people are afraid they'll be revealed. But what do I know...
never resign
Anytime a business, especially the City of Suffolk recommends resignation or termination, opt for the latter. I don't know what it is about the City but they tend to take (hope for) the opt out easy approach than having their potential dirty laundry aired. I've noticed reading these comments that it depends on who you're friends with, work for/with, who you supported in the past, your agenda, etc as to how you view this subject. I hope everything works out for the best for her.
Suffolk Manager
If you don't live in Suffolk, "WHO CARES." These are political jobs so stop crying your eyeballs out....you got another job, shut-up becasue as I said, "WHO CARES."
I do support term limits. Most of those people think they're royalty!
Do you want to solve the real problem?
If you do, then it's time to put TERM LIMITS on every elected and appointed seat of public trust in city government. This is nothing but an ongoing case of corruption caused in part by complacency. George Washington said it best, "it is wrong for any person to monopolize a seat of public trust". That's why he limited himself to two terms in every office he held. A smart man, maybe we should pay attention to what he said. He was right then and he is right now. If you don't like the way things are now, you have to take a CHANCE on CHANGE and vote out every incumbent that has been in the elected position for two terms. The main problem is that our government has lost touch with the citizens because they have been in office too long and are sheltered from the everyday struggles of the everyday citizen. PLEASE PEOPLE!!! WISE UP!! Stop putting the same loser's in office over and over again. A rookie can't mess it up any worse than the corrupt, self involved, greedy, complacent loser's we have in office now.