The Virginian-Pilot
©
Would the jurors talk now? Would the 12 people who had decided Ryan Frederick's fate, who said he was guilty of manslaughter - but not capital murder - finally discuss their deliberations?
In a word, no. Even though a Chesapeake Circuit Court judge had decided last week to follow their recommended 10-year sentence against Frederick for fatally shooting Detective Jarrod Shivers during a 2008 drug raid.
"I'd rather not comment," said one.
Goodbye, said another.
"Collectively, we didn't want to make any comments to the media out of respect to both families," another said empathetically - and resolutely. The trial "was very tough for the city."
I made the calls this week, searching for how the jurors weighed the evidence; how much Frederick's admitted marijuana growing and pot smoking contributed to the verdict; and whether they blamed the Chesapeake police for their large show of force against someone who had no prior criminal record, and who could have been arrested going to or from work.
Local residents, therefore, have no additional information following the February verdict. It remains a compromise decision that didn't send Frederick away for life, but didn't grant him freedom, either.
However, Frederick, who apologized to Shivers' family during last week's sentencing, should consider himself very lucky.
He could be Cory Maye.
In a Mississippi case that's surprisingly similar to Frederick's, Maye had been on death row in the December 2001 slaying of a police officer during a drug raid. And Maye, who also had no prior criminal record, can make a strong argument that Mississippi law enforcement officials screwed up - and that he's now paying the price. Race hangs over the Mississippi killing: Maye is black, and the slain officer was white.
Maye has been championed by Radley Balko, who has written extensively about Maye's case at www.reason.com and on his own blog, www.theagitator.com. He's also reported about the overuse of police SWAT teams.
In late 2001, authorities obtained a warrant for two apartments in a Prentiss, Miss., duplex. A suspected drug dealer lived in one; Maye, his girlfriend and their toddler daughter lived in the other. The suspected dealer was arrested, and drugs were seized the night of Dec. 26. Officers then turned to Maye's residence, though the warrant - obtained with the help of a "confidential informant" - did not identify Maye or his girlfriend by name.
Maye, who has said he drifted off to sleep that evening and was there with his 18-month-old daughter, was awakened by the commotion and pounding at his door and did not hear police announce themselves. He retreated to his bedroom and fired three shots at a person entering the room. An officer was killed. Only a tiny stub of a marijuana cigar was recovered from his apartment.
Plagued by tactical errors by his original attorney, who had never defended a capital murder case before, Maye was found guilty and sentenced to death. His trial judge later threw out the death penalty, and Maye was re-sentenced to life in prison.
But Balko's spotlight gained the attention of gun rights activists and other attorneys, including the Washington firm of Covington & Burling. It's working for free on Cory Maye's appeals. The Mississippi Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments June 4, including a request to throw out the guilty verdict.
"It was a very troubling case," attorney Abram J. Pafford told me by phone this week. He initially learned about it from reading Balko's updates.
Maye "had no criminal record, no history of violence," attorney Pafford continued. "It seemed so clear to me that Cory's explanation for what happened was so logical... and made so much more sense." The amount of marijuana uncovered from his apartment would have led to only a misdemeanor fine.
Like I said earlier, if you've been following Frederick's case, you'll notice the similarities to the Maye incident. You'll recognize the strong use of force.
And you'll probably come to the conclusion that the Chesapeake jury, correctly, fashioned a verdict that more closely looks like justice.
Roger Chesley is associate editor of The Pilot's editorial page. Reach him at (757) 446-2329 or at roger.chesley@pilotonline.com.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Is the verdict really in?
The fact that Mr. Chesney keep bringing up the issue concerning Ryan's Frederick's conviction for murder even weeks later after the trial must signify that he, too, must be in awe of the verdict that the jury rendered. I know that I am! I can only imagine that the jury must have been privy to some information that the public is not aware of, or were instructed that a finding of "not guity" could end up costing the city of Chesapeake a lot of money. For whatever reason, they must have felt that they or a loved one could never be put in position where their actions will be judged against the actions of the police. To Mr. Chesney, I say thank you for keeping the case at the forefront--that's what good newspapermen do when an injustice or event of questionable circumstances occurs. We, the Ryan Frederick supporters applaud you on this one.
It's Virginia That is Behind the Times
Actually Mississippi has lowered its enforcement priority where Marijuana is concerned. Chances are Ryan would not have been put in the situation which caused him to defend his home and wind up with a lengthy sentence had he resided there. It's sad that so many lives are lost and ruined over such a petty issue. It's time we decriminalize or at least lower the priority of criminality for possession or growing of small amounts of pot.
fortunate he wasn't in Mississippi
Aren't we all?
Wish I had known
you would be questioning them. I'd have suggested you ask each of them if they could be certain, had they been placed in Frederick's situation, with only seconds to react to an unknown threat, they would not have done the exact same thing?
My Personal View.
The "War on Drugs" is out of hand. I saw a high official involved in the "War on Drugs" talking about Marijuana the other day. His statements were mostly twisted spin sprinkled with outright lies. There are many of the people involved in the "War on Drugs" that either profit or or just downright Enjoy kicking down the doors of harmless pot smokers. They love to seize cars, money, and other property of these folks. They enjoy driving around in Range Rovers, sports cars, and other nice vehicles that they seized. Many others are dedicated professionals who's time dealing with serious drugs such as meth and crack is being diverted to going after pot smokers.
By the way, I'm a cop.
SWAT!
The use of SWAT teams in every big jurisdiction is out of hand. All SWAT team activities should be closely scrutinized. It appears that our drug laws make no sense and attempts at enforcing those laws have failed. Yes, drugs kill, but it seems they are killing the wrong people.