81°
forecast

Norfolk council to reverse Highland Park zoning

Posted to: News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Bowing to the wishes of residents from a small neighborhood near Old Dominion University, Mayor Paul Fraim said Tuesday that the City Council will reverse its decision to allow an apartment building in Highland Park.

Fraim was the deciding vote in a 5-3 council decision on April 28 to rezone nearly 3/4 of an acre on the Lafayette River for high-density development. Developer Dietrich Heyder had planned to build a four -story, 21-unit development there.

Residents mounted a petition drive that in three weeks gathered more than 5,000 signatures as of Tuesday night, said Amry Cox, who led the petition drive for the Residents for Responsive Government.

The group needed only 4,000 signatures to force the council to either rescind the rezoning or have the issue decided in a referendum.

Fraim said he was so impressed by the group's enthusiasm that he began to rethink the issue, especially on Monday, when a petition volunteer knocked on his door.

On Tuesday night he met with about 50 residents and conceded that "sometimes we make mistakes. But the council is not deaf. We hear you."

He said he had spoken to other council members and expects the issue to be reconsidered next Tuesday. "I anticipate the vote will be 7-0," Fraim said.

This is the second time in four years that the city has faced a referendum drive. In 2005, the Bay Oaks Park Committee turned in petitions with almost 5,400 signatures demanding the council rescind rezoning that would have allowed houses to be built on part of 21 acres in East Ocean View.

That controversy was handled much differently by the city, which challenged the group in court.

The issue ended up in the Virginia Supreme Court, where the city lost. A compromise, in which half the land was set aside as a park, was cemented in March.

Peter G. Decker III, attorney for Heyder, said the Highland Park group has good intentions but is misguided. "This petition drive is nothing like the Bay Oaks situation," he said. "That was a public park. This is private property.

"I seriously doubt that many people who signed the petition were made aware they were taking away a man's right to develop his own property."

He said Heyder will have no choice but to develop six single-

family homes. Decker said the homes will almost certainly be rented to ODU students. He said there will be less green space and more cars on the street than there would have been with apartments.

A decades-old oak tree, which Heyder had hoped to save, will have to be cut down to make way for the homes, Decker said.

Although enthusiastic in their support of Fraim's change of heart, residents still expressed exasperation with overcrowding, parking problems and code enforcement in their neighborhood. Fraim promised no quick fixes, saying code enforcement is a pervasive problem.

"But clearly, we need to do a better job," he said.

Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Red in the Face

The really frightening part about all of this is that they almost got away with it. If the property owner had hired a lawyer that was worth his scrap then they would have been successful. Thankfully III failed to do most of his prep work and lost another decision at the bench. It's a shame that Mayor Fraim involved himself with this entire debacle. He must surely be unhappy for losing face over this issue because junior didn't do his homework again.

Does Junior really believe that

the citizens are so completely ignorant? How arrogant can you be?? It doesn't require a law degree to comprehend that 21 apartments will eventually decrease the value of neighboring property and increase traffic, not to mention the noise disturbances and almost certain inrease in crime. Six houses are preferable, even without the tree. Decker should concede that it isn't always about one man with the most money and his right to develop his own property (to make even more money); it's about what is right for the entire community. I believe this is the first time I have ever applauded a decision Paul Frame has made.

Family Image

As a petitioner, I was quite shocked at the number of people who would sign anything, as long as it was against the Decker family. When did the image of benevolent philanthropists change to an image of snake-oil salesmen? When did the moniker "Uncle Pete" stop reflecting a kind, yet eccentric relative and instead seem to refer to a minor character from the Sopranos?
Before those who love the Decker family jump all over me for this post, I would like to remind them that this is not my opinion. This is sentiment echoed over and over again by Norfolk residents. Without a doubt there was far more animosity toward the family than good-will.
It's a shame the reputation of these prominent leaders in the community has gone downhill so quickly.

GOOD...

...for them!!!...I will protect MY hood the same way!!!

HIghland Park Zoning

Just remember because Norfolk votes for city council in May, only 1000 votes are needed to swing an election. With the discontent shown by city employees (which 2400 live in the city) the other communities, and flash point issues like Highland Park and Bay Oaks, we may be seeing a different City Council next May. Remember politicians depend on having money to keep their constituents happy, this year and next there will be no money to fund pet projects (or pork)so that leaves an opening for challengers to say they can do better.

Fear mongering by Decker

Absolutely pitiful response by Decker, because he doesn't get his way. Why should Highland Park be upset that six new houses are put in this neighborhood? That's what we have wanted for YEARS while the owners sat on the property. As for more cars on the street with houses rather than apartments: that's laughable. 21 apartments means 2 or 3 students in each apartment, each with his or her own car. How many spaces were allotted to this apartment complex? i doubt there were 42 spaces.

must be nice. . .

not to be bound by principles.

"I seriously doubt that many people who signed the petition were made aware they were taking away a man's right to develop his own property."

Heyder did not have that right to develop his property in that manner until the decision City Council made on April 28. This decision by the Mayor and Council merely return the zoning to what it was when Heyder bought the property, which was 6 single family houses in R-8 zoning.

I guess the property rights of the neighbors and the other 5000+ people who signed the petition are uninportant, after all they do not pay Deckers hourly bill.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox