Paying our overdue obligation to the poor

Posted to: Editorials Opinion Virginia

Virginia's flimsy safety net for destitute families is a product of a flinty, self-sufficient culture born of a frontier founding and fostered by a strong belief in the American dream.

In 2009, job creation remains the most viable strategy for the long-term prosperity of the commonwealth, but economic-development efforts alone have failed to beat down a poverty rate that has stubbornly hovered at 10 percent for two decades. Today, 739,000 Virginians live below the poverty level, defined as less than $20,650 in annual income for a family of four.

That's thousands of our neighbors and friends struggling to afford a roof and enough to eat. Worse, the current recession threatens to plunge thousands more into an abrupt financial crisis. Many are coping with uncertainty, unemployment and despair for the first time.

The timing is appropriate for the creation of a task force charged with recommending new ways to reduce poverty in Virginia. Gov. Timothy M. Kaine this month announced the new group, which includes state officials, bankers, nonprofit leaders and legislators.

Members should consult two recent reports on the topic. The New York Times chronicled the confusing and illogical mix of state programs that mete out relief and rejection based on where a person lives.

The inescapable conclusion is that many Virginians would be better off elsewhere. The Old Dominion ranks 47th among the 50 states in per-capita spending on Medicaid, the health insurance program for indigent families. With only 29 percent of the unemployed receiving benefits, only four states are stingier in granting jobless aid.

The analysis reveals the absurdities that have evolved in Virginia policy. The state is not generous with any aid program but is especially restrictive on unemployment assistance, even though it is designed for those who have had jobs and are searching for new employment. State lawmakers refused to loosen the rules even temporarily when offered $125 million from the federal stimulus package for that purpose.

While Virginia has done a respectable job in enrolling 71 percent of its low-income children in health insurance programs, only 34 percent of poor adults are covered because eligibility rules block most applicants making more than $6,000 a year. Insurance alone won't keep a child healthy if his parents are chronically ill and unable to care for him.

The second report, from the nonprofit Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis, outlines specific recommendations for addressing Virginia's meager aid programs. The Richmond research group last week urged state leaders to expand eligibility for jobless aid and health insurance.

It also recommended the state take advantage of other federal incentives tied to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. The Institute notes that fewer than 50,500 children were enrolled in 2007, but 96,000 Virginia youngsters live in deep poverty, defined as annual incomes less than $11,000 for a family of four.

Finally, the group pressed for reforms to the state tax system, which now forces Virginians making less than $18,000 annually to pay nearly nine times as much of their income in sales and excise taxes as the state's wealthiest 1 percent.

If Virginia leaders can't be moved to take even small steps to help care for struggling residents when they need the state's assistance, it undermines the very notion of this place as a commonwealth.

A fair-weather state that happily accepts tax receipts but provides no safety net pricks at the conscience of all but the hardest-hearted Virginians.

Poverty is a frustrating problem even in times of economic stability, but the need for new approaches to an old and obstinate problem has never been more urgent.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

the difference now is

If I had called someone "pathetic" my comment would have been removed and I would have been banned for months.

But we all know some on here have more than one user ID.

Gertz...

...the only help I want from the state or federal government is a lower tax liability! Don't forget that the full time working widow/widower receives "social security" from the government which amount is determined by how much her/his husband/wife made in their life and paid into "the system". "Wealthy corporations" EMPLOY people, poor people do not EMPLOY people that is the difference. Besides if they have such a strong need (working at minimum wage) for more money they should have a VERY STRONG motivating purpose in their lives to work hard, do their job well and EARN a pay raise. The only people who are truly "overcharging" the citizenry are the teachers unions. Talk about "NO BID" awards! They can THREATEN not to TEACH our STUDENTS who have tax PAYING parents! How in the world is that fair?

throughout history,

governments, including theocracies & dictatorships, have had aid programs for the poor. A society functions better if it is willing to assist the less fortunate within its' realm. Why do some deem the poor as unworthy of assistance using tax monies yet have no problem with tax monies being used to further enrich wealthy corporations, who over charge our citizenry for products & overcharge our government, for defense products & other services, (using no-bid contracts, ala Halliburton), thereby overcharging the citizenry, again? A single widow or widower, with children, working full time, makes only $13,624/yr, before taxes, if making the federal minimum wage. Whether some wish to believe it or not, there are a lot of people with more than a high school education earning that type income, today.

my original thought

My original thought did not get posted so I thought I would keep it simple this time. Some times the Pilot doesn't post comments for a variety of unknow reasons.

Some of you can sit here and debate the Constitution all you want to, and I hope it makes you feel better about yourselves or maybe it justifies the greed and selfishness that I've been reading.

It sounds like many of you have never known or know anyone who is really poor, and the numbers are increasing every day. Let's hope some of you don't fall into that bracket.

pathetic

I hope a number of you never have the need for help.

See if we can try this again today.

This comment is awaiting staff approval.

Submitted by 2cents on Mon, 05/18/2009 at 8:44 am.
Just aren't buying into your pity party. There are too many people working who worked full time jobs, looking full time work. If you are only looking for a part-time job to keep your welfare status, then your poverty has never been your priority and is not suddenly the publics’.

Number one way to avoid poverty...Do Not Drop Out of High School.

Number two way to avoid poverty...Do Not Have babies as teen-agers.

Number three way to avoid poverty...Do Not Have a second baby if you are already on any type of public assistance.

Number four way to avoid poverty....Do not get addicted to drugs or alcohol.

To truly help those in need, reduce the number of people who are just abusing these programs. Those that wont work full time, so that they don't have a reduction in the free benefits, are the ones that make it impossible to better help those that are truly disabled, elderly, or suffering a short term unforeseeable tragedy.

Futhermore, if you want to donate above the rate of taxation, you are most welcome to write a check.

Ford was in Norfolk,

on Indian River Road. All people on a company payroll, have payroll taxes taken out of their checks. Only if persons are paid cash, off the books, is this evaded. The fact that Va. was the Seat of the Confederacy, has more to do with the notoriously low wages & pitiful assistance to the working poor & recently unemployed, than any immigrant factor. If one fails to understand this, perhaps one needs to study actual history, not his story.

Any idea why the author didn't include their name...

taking "credit" for this article? I forgot Virginia doesn't have a WIC program do we? We don't have section 8 housing do we? We don't have head start programs do we? We don't provide free lunch for kids at school do we? We don't provide food stamps/EBT cards do we? We don't have any kind of job training do we? We don't have able bodied men and women collecting social security do we? Stingy unemployment? What does that mean? You have to have a work history to get it and it is based upon how much you earned before being laid off. Poor pay more in taxes now? So what does the writer want? A graduated sales tax system? We already have a graduated income tax system which excludes the poor giving them a 0 tax liability! Step 2 for the transition to communism! The poor man and woman need to work their way out of poverty because no amount of goverment will make them wealthy.

Terryk91169...

I don't know where you got your information about legal and illegal immigrants but I used to be a legal immigrant before I became a US Citizen and I have always been paying taxes when I was an immigrant and same with all the legal immigrants that I know then and now.

Terry...

You cannot tax what does not "exist". "Migrants" typically work under the table and receive cash money. They then go to the local western union and wire the money back to Mexico or where they came from. The money is not on the books and therefore was never paid. Of course we should all be sympathetic to the illegal plight and turn a blind eye to their free medical, free public school, in state tuition (I can't figure that one out), identity theft, free SSI, free public assistance and all of the other leeching on our society. I suddenly feel all warm inside for some reason and it isn't philanthropic in nature.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners