Hampton Roads, VA - 11/08/2009
Clear52°Clear
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Questions, answers on Virginia's jobless benefits

Posted to: Editorials Opinion Virginia




The debate over whether Virginia should accept $125 million in federal stimulus aid to pay for jobless benefits is likely to rage right up to Election Day and beyond.

Democrats say expanding eligibility to more displaced workers in the midst of a recession is morally justified and would bolster the economy. Republicans say the action would raise taxes on businesses, discouraging job creation.

The complexity of the issue and the partisan tenor of the debate have generated mountains of misinformation and a cascade of confusion. Some unemployed men and women already receiving aid incorrectly fear they will lose their benefits. Some business owners hold false hope that they can avoid tax increases this year if eligibility is frozen.

In an effort to encourage educated discourse over the coming months, here is a primer on the topic.

 

How many Virginians are receiving monthly unemployment checks now?

According to the Virginia Employment Commission, 101,371 people received benefits last month.

 

Can workers who quit their jobs or who are fired for misconduct collect benefits?

Workers who leave their jobs voluntarily without good cause cannot collect benefits. The Virginia Employment Commission determines whether good cause exists, such as ongoing discrimination by the employer. The burden of proof is on workers to show they exhausted all reasonable alternatives for resolving an issue before quitting. Workers who quit to start their own businesses are disqualified.

Workers can't collect assistance if they are fired for misconduct, such as failing a drug test, committing a crime or being chronically absent or tardy. Also, those who are collecting benefits must consistently demonstrate that they are actively seeking a new job.

 

How would eligibility change if Virginia expanded its benefits to qualify for stimulus funds?

Laid-off workers enrolled in job training programs approved by the state or the federal Workforce Investment Act would receive up to 26 additional weeks of benefits if they needed them to complete their coursework. The expansion would apply only to people with no prospect of returning to their old jobs, either because they worked in a declining industry, such as textiles, or their former employer made a permanent reduction in operations.

A larger number of part-time workers would become eligible for benefits. They would be allowed to collect benefits even if their job search was limited to other part-time jobs, not full-time employment.

 

How many new people would get benefits with those changes, and what would it cost?

The Virginia Employment Commission identified 6,867 part-time workers and 1,043 people in training who would be added, at a cost of less than $20 million a year.

 

Could students who quit their summer jobs to return to classes get benefits?

Typically no, because they are voluntarily ending their employment. Amusement parks are worried, however, that they would face higher taxes for seasonal workers whose jobs end when the parks close each year.

 

Will businesses pay higher taxes if eligibility is expanded?

If the state legislature leaves the expanded benefits in place, businesses will see an average tax increase of $1.71 per employee annually in 2011. The amount would peak at $4.73 per employee per year in 2012 before declining.

 

Aren't unemployment insurance taxes going up already?

Yes. Businesses pay taxes into a special fund that pays for unemployment benefits. When that fund runs low, taxes automatically increase to replenish it. Businesses currently pay an average of $98 per worker each year, but that tax is forecast to rise to $155 next year and $218 in 2012. The exact amounts will depend on the number of people needing benefits in future months. Any future tax increases tied to expanded eligibility would be on top of those increases.

 

Would those tax increases have been delayed if Virginia had taken the $125 million from the stimulus package?

Probably not. Nearly 300,000 Virginians are now unemployed, and the state is spending about $100 million a month on benefits. The unemployment fund is already so low that $125 million won't be enough to avoid automatic triggers to increase business taxes.

However, if the legislature increased eligibility, then rolled it back within a couple of years, the $125 million might slightly reduce the size of tax increases on businesses, according to VEC calculations.

 

Do the changes in eligibility have to be permanent?

No. The U.S. Department of Labor has said Virginia can collect $125 million in federal stimulus money if it passes a state law expanding eligibility. The law cannot have an automatic cut-off date when eligibility would be rolled back. However, labor officials have said the state would not be penalized if legislators repealed the law.

 

Will people already eligible for benefits lose their monthly checks now?

No. They will continue to receive assistance based on current law.

 

Why is this still an issue? Hasn't the legislature already voted?

The General Assembly voted to reject the $125 million in April, but the issue has taken center stage in this year's gubernatorial and legislative elections.

 

Did the federal government give Virginia's $125 million to other states?

No. Virginia has until 2011 to request the funds, so the legislature has time to change its mind.

 

Won't the House reject the benefits again if the issue comes up next year?

Republican leaders in the House say they will not accept the stimulus money unless Congress waives the requirement that eligibility be expanded. Democrats are betting that they will either seize control of the House or defeat enough Republicans that GOP leaders will reconsider their position. The House now consists of 53 Republicans, 45 Democrats and two independents.

 

Republicans say they did accept some federal money for unemployment benefits. Is that true?

Republican and Democratic legislators all voted to extend benefits for up to 13 weeks for workers who already qualify for aid. The federal government will pick up 100 percent of the cost. That extension is in addition to two other extensions enacted by the federal government because of high unemployment. The maximum period a worker can collect benefits is now 72 weeks. Virginia also received $62.8 million from the federal stimulus for jobless aid without any vote by the legislature.

 

Will Virginia businesses move to other states if their taxes go up?

If they move because they want to pay lower unemployment insurances taxes, they'll have to relocate to South Dakota or Mississippi, the only states with lower tax rates. North Carolina's tax, in comparison, averages $342 per employee annually, more than three times Virginia's existing rate.

 

What is the average unemployment tax and benefit amount nationwide?

The national average tax rate is $285 per employee per year. Virginia's average tax rate is currently $98. The average national weekly benefit is $300.



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Where does the Pilot get there numbers?

"Will businesses pay higher taxes if eligibility is expanded?
If the state legislature leaves the expanded benefits in place, businesses will see an average tax increase of $1.71 per employee annually in 2011. The amount would peak at $4.73 per employee per year in 2012 before declining."
My brother just showed me his SUTA statement. Last year he paid 0.7% or $36 a quarter for 3 employees. His new amount is 5.0% and $1550 per quarter. To pay 5% taxes on what you pay your employees is insane! When its all said and done he pays more than 60% in taxes on everything he makes. The mafia asks for less than that. Where does the Pilot get $4.73 per year? What tax rate is enough to make people riot? 85%?

did we all read the same article?

I read the article as an explanation while others.....well, I don't think they even read it.

A better idea

If Obama really wants to help the unemployed, it would be easy to do so.

For two years, the same period of time these Federal funds would be available to the States for their changed unemployment benefit systems, the Federal Government could suspend the double taxation of business profits (Corporate income tax and then tax on dividends paid on stocks). Taxing the profits only once would stimulate the economy far more effectively than any of the other stimulus spending has or will and would bring investment and jobs making unemployment benefits unnecessary.

And, of course, the Congress could re-enact the taxes after the two years of unparalleled prosperity and bring back the recession if it chooses.

It would be no more difficult than for the States to re-enact their previous unemployment tax rates.

I applaud the Pilot..

for presenting this issue in the format provided. However, after reading the column, and again re-reading it, I see nothing to indicate that the actions of the General Assembly were wrong in rejecting this money. Some aspects of the stimulus bill indicate that 'trusting' to the largesse of the Federal Govt may represent a road best left untaken.

For example, it says that no cutoff dates can be imposed. Why not, if, as they say, the state can vote to cease receiving such money? The answer is that a change in the state's govt can lead to these requirements being permanent, and busnesses will be stuck for those 'temporary' costs. Another thing here, the 'average' tax increase per employee is $1.71, topping out at $4.00 plus in 2012. What happens after that? It's a relevant question. Until more info is forthcoming, I hope our elected officials do not 'trust' the Feds in any of this, and make them etch everything in stone before any ations are taken..

Clarification

Contrary to Greenmun's predictable reaction, the Pilot is simply providing relevant and helpful answers about this issue so citizens can make up their mind with the knowledge of the actual facts of the matter, not the spin of the facts that has been evident on both sides of the issue. I for one was not aware of the full impact of the bill and of its actual effects. When we debated this issue at the Chamber a month or so ago, one lawyer stated the action could not be changed, another said it could. Who to believe? Fact is, on these issues that get into the complexity of programs, it is helpful to have the facts so we can hold politicians who must vote on this issues accountable for their action.

VP asks, “Will people

VP asks, “Will people already eligible for benefits lose their monthly checks now?
VP answers, "No. They will continue to receive assistance based on current law.”

Why should they receive unemployment while already on public assistance? If they accept full time work then possibly they would not need the entitlement assistance? I would love to work part-time and have the rest of my bills paid as well…..why should taxpayers and employers subsidize folks to put in half efforts? Many of us worked full time jobs to send ourselves through college or training programs. Take your pick, full time work, public assistance, or (in the VP's opinion) unemployment for part-time workers looking only for part-time work, but not all three.

For goodness sake have some pity for the taxpayers footing the bill.

Once again treating your readers with the

disdain of assuming we are all ignorant, confused, and misled. Shame on the Pilot for the ever present and all encompassing bias it portrays on every topic.

VP asks, “Do the changes in eligibility have to be permanent?"

VP answers, "No. The U.S. Department of Labor has said Virginia can collect $125 million in federal stimulus money if it passes a state law expanding eligibility. The law cannot have an automatic cut-off date when eligibility would be rolled back. However, labor officials have said the state would not be penalized if legislators repealed the law.”

How many assistance programs, once established as an entitlement, have been rescinded by the state legislature? Please provide a list of all state and local assistance programs that have been discontinued after federal funding has ended. Please list the legislators that have passed such bills ending these type of programs.

who needs the tenth amendment anyway?

Obama studied constitutional law. I guess he'd know whether the federal government has any business dictating how states administer unemployment benefits.

Real Q&A

Q: Why is the Pilot beating a dead horse? A: Because they are the propaganda machine promoting the liberal-socialist Democratic Party and this is another attack on Republican Bob McDonnell, who opposes the intrusion of the Federal government into the affairs of the Commonwealth of Virginia.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Editorials Stories

More Opinion Stories

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners