The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
There were always a handful of folks in Sandbridge with sand fences.
But this spring the squat wood slates started popping up in front of house after house along the Oceanfront.
Neighbors took notice. Soon, the city did too.
Virginia Beach officials say the sand fences, many of which are in the northern end of Sandbridge, aren't allowed, and they want residents to remove them.
The beach is supposed to be open to the public for recreation and the fences are an obstruction, said Dan Adams, a city engineer.
They also can block city vehicles that need to pick up litter and could jeopardize a multi million-dollar sand replenishment project, Adams said.
"That all of this was done without checking with the city is amazing," said Councilwoman Barbara Henley, whose district includes Sandbridge. "It's an issue that has a lot of ramifications."
James Barton, a long-time Sandbridge resident who installs the fences, defended their use as protection for property owners.
The fences catch sand into a dune and prevent the grains from flying into air conditioners, swimming pools, drains and houses, Barton said.
"If there weren't sand fences, you'd have a lot of people calling the city saying the 'sand is causing havoc on my million-dollar property,' " Barton said. "Sandbridge has got sand everywhere but where it's supposed to be."
He installed sand fences in Sandbridge as a teenager in the 1970s, when this southeastern strip of Virginia Beach had a much narrower beach because of erosion. To protect their cottages from the winds and keep the ocean from swallowing their property, residents installed these fences, Barton said.
Starting in 1998, the city and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers began piling sand from the ocean onto Sandbridge to widen the beach.
Every four years, the agencies bring between a million and two million cubic yards of sand to Sandbridge. The city and the corps share the sand replenishment cost, which has ranged between $8.1 million and $12.7 million.
In exchange, Sandbridge residents turned over Oceanfront easements to the city because the corps would participate in the sand replenishment project only on a public beach. Sandbridge residents also pay an additional six cents on their real-estate property taxes for the sand.
Both residents and city officials consider the project a success and credit it for raising property values in Sandbridge.
Barton said he thinks Sandbridge residents could have come to their own compromise on the fence issue without city involvement.
"We're trying to keep this in house, in Sandbridge," he said.
But not all Sandbridge residents agree on the fences. Some residents, especially those who live inland, want them removed.
Bill Brown is concerned that the fences are the first step toward creating a private beach. Soon more permanent structures such as gazebos and fish ponds could be built on the public beach, preventing even locals from enjoying it, Brown said.
Norfolk officials also are dealing with similar beach encroachment issues in Ocean View.
"It's not right," Brown said. "The longer the city waits, the harder it gets to do something about it."
The city will be sending out letters to Sandbridge residents informing them that encroachments aren't allowed into the easement. Officials also will attend the Sandbridge Civic League meeting next month, said Becky Kubin, a city attorney.
The next sand replenishment project is scheduled for late 2010, and city officials say they don't want the corps to pull out because of these fences.
Deirdre Fernandes, (757) 222-5121, deirdre.fernandes@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Sand fencing
The VB Beach Management Plan on April 2002 sheds some light on this issue. A quick look at the document shows a photo captioned "sand dune restoration project" and shows sand fencing, beach grasses, and a keep off the dunes sign - all apparently sanctioned by the city.
The plan goes on to state that "access to Sandbridge Beach is excellent" with 51 public beach accesses. It further lauds the "ample opportunities for non-resident visitation."
Let's support conservation efforts. Keep the foot traffic off the dunes, plant grasses, and, yes, wisely use fencing to catch that wind born sand and keep it on the beach instead of the roads.
Removing sand fences would have negative effects on the beaches we all love.
Sandbridge - sand fences
I am amazed by the controversy and comments about the sand fences. My family built in Sandbridge in the mid 1960's and some of my earliest memories are of putting up sand fence to help reduce erosion. When I purchased in Sandbridge in the 1990's I immediately started planting sea grasses and installing sand fencing to try to build up the dunes and beach.
Many writers seem to think the sand fences are installed to stop beach usage - nothing could be further from the truth. We are trying to build up and improve the beach for all to use. Do we try to keep people off the dunes? Yes - we do not want day visitors, renters, owners, or anyone else trampling the grasses and pushing down the sand on the dunes. Dunes act as a small bit of protection - for all the homeowners and users of the beach.
Years ago I asked one of the Virginia Beach beach management engineers for advice on controlling erosion and building up the beach. His suggestions - plant lots of beach grasses and use sand fencing. His advice was spot on.
hey santa, the dunes aren't "yours"
Actually, the Federal government, through the Corps of Engineers, has jurisdiction over the coastal dunes, regardless of whether they exist on your property or not, and regulate what you may and may not do on them. The VA Marine Resources Commission also regulates activity on coastal lands, including the dunes. The city may also have some regulatory jurisdiction. Once again, this is an example of the 'entitled' believing that they may do whatever they want, wherever they want, whenever they want. It just isn't always so.
Owners . . .
Don't seem to understand that the extra taxes they pay for sand replenishment doesn't cover more than a fraction of it.
Also, that the beach has been build *beyond* their properties, so therefore does not belong to them. When we "reclaim" land from the sea, it is either public land or must be bought for someone to lay claim to it.
Haven't you folks noticed the beaches are broader now than when you first bought your properties???
Not the case
Building out beyond the property line does not appear to the case by anything in the article. It only mentions the easement. The cost of the sand replenishment is irrelevant to the property rights issue.
rules are rules
The dunes are regulated at the Federal, state and local levels regardless of your property line.
Fully funded by residents?
Here - read this - http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-05-14-va-beach-erosion_x.htm
Thanks, that was a good article
However, I don't think anyone is claiming that Sandbridge residents pay the entire cost of sand replenishment. The federal government pays about two thirds (according to the article). My point is that the taxpayers of Virginia Beach (outside of Sandbridge homeowners) do not pay for Sandbridge sand replenishment. People should get off their high horse about their tax dollars benefiting only the "rich" oceanfront homeowners. Those homeowners pay far more in property taxes than most of us.
The real point here is that the sand fences have absolutely no negative impact on anyone who has complained about them in these comments. They do not hinder beach access, they do not cost the city taxpayers a penny, and they do not affect enjoyment of the beach by anyone. They're there to protect the houses during bad storms. The fences might not be legal, but I don't understand all the anger from some people.
Stay off the dunes
I read in the article, "They also can block city vehicles that need to pick up litter." I hope city vehicles are not driving on the dunes that the fences can protect.
Where is the proof that fences will impact federal sand replinishment dollars?
to those defending the property owners:
Your arguments would have more weight if the story wasn't accompanied by a photo of a home-made sign warning the riff-raff to stay off the dunes. Reminds me of north-end 'no parking' signs. Certain VB residents have an entitlement mentality based on their address. This is fact that can be supported through pilot stories and LTEs (and accompanying comments) over the past several years.
"I put up a fence and a sign, but I'm not trying to keep you off my beach." Sorry, I find that exceedingly hard to swallow.