73°
forecast

Man sues Virginia Beach for $200,000 after year in jail

Posted to: News

VIRGINIA BEACH

Terence J. Darden left home on the eve of his 22nd birthday to celebrate.

By the end of the night, he'd be handcuffed and booked into the Virginia Beach Correctional Center, accused of robbing a young man at gunpoint.

Darden spent 340 days jailed without bond, walking free on March 31 after a co-defendant pleaded guilty and passed a polygraph that cleared Darden. Prosecutors dropped the charges.

Now he's suing the city for wrongful arrest and seeking $200,000 in compensation for the "extreme emotional and psychological pain as a result of the negligence of the Virginia Beach Police," according to his lawsuit, filed in the city's Circuit Court.

"It's a pretty sloppy job the police did," said his attorney, Robert H. Bennett. "This is a heck of a long time he spent in jail."

Bennett declined repeated requests to interview his client, and no one answered the door to the townhome on Pine Cone Circle where Darden lived before his arrest in April 2008. But court records cast him as a man with a checkered past who happened to pass through the wrong place at the wrong time.

"We've got a number of things, when they're all put together, will justify some sort of award for the plaintiff," Bennett said. "It's not like it's just one big thing that happened."

It was late on April 25, a Friday night, when Darden asked Marcus Lee for a ride to 7-Eleven, the lawsuit claims.

The two friends borrowed a buddy's car, a red Lexus, and left Lee's townhome in Green Run. They pulled into the lot at a 7-Eleven on Holland Road and Darden walked inside. At 12:12 a.m., he bought 50 minutes for his phone and walked back to the car, and the pair returned to Lee's townhome, according to his suit.

At 12:20 a.m., the city's 911 center received a call reporting a robbery near Green Run Elementary School. A young man told the dispatcher that five minutes earlier, he and two others had been at the school's athletic fields when a black woman pulled up in a red car. Two black men stepped from the car, robbed him at gunpoint and fled, the victim said. The school is about the midway point on the 2.5-mile route between the 7-Eleven and Lee's townhome.

About 12:45 a.m., Darden asked for a ride home. He and Lee, again in the red Lexus, drove away and turned onto Dahlia Drive, the lawsuit says.

On the way, an officer pulled them over. Darden was on probation and had a criminal record that included convictions for drug possession, petty theft and other charges. He was handcuffed.

The robbery victim was brought to the scene, saw Darden and identified him as one of the robbers. The other, he told police, was Ronald Galloway, with whom he'd played baseball and neighborhood football years earlier.

Darden was taken to jail; later that morning, police arrested Galloway.

Darden's lawsuit claims that the robbery victim identified him as he stood handcuffed and alone at the rear of a police cruiser. The method was "improper, unduly suggestive, coercive and negligently performed," and it deviated from the department's policy of showing "at least six photographs to a witness or victim," the suit says.

Officers also failed to find a black woman or gun, or the iPod that was reported stolen inside the Lexus, the lawsuit says.

Police spokesman Adam Bernstein said the department was aware of the lawsuit and that officials had begun an internal investigation. He declined further comment.

During a hearing in July, Darden's attorney, James P. Brice, told the court he had learned another young man, who looked similar to Darden, was rumored to have robbed the victim that April night. He told prosecutor Katherine E. Orsini the man's name and asked to postpone Darden's hearing so authorities could investigate.

Orsini opposed his request, and General District Judge Gene A. Woolard ordered the hearing to proceed. Moments later, the victim took the witness stand and pointed to Galloway and Darden as the robbers.

Brice said Friday that he was frustrated by officers' refusal to investigate the other man, despite being provided his name, photo and information that he had talked about the robbery. He said 7-Eleven also failed to provide the surveillance tape that would have cleared Darden.

In an interview this month at the city's jail, Galloway said that he told police from the beginning that Darden wasn't involved. He pleaded guilty in March and is awaiting transfer to a state prison to complete his five-year sentence.

Galloway said he wasn't allowed to take the polygraph that ultimately cleared Darden until he agreed to plead guilty. He initially turned down a plea offer last fall.

"I wanted to release Mr. Darden because he had nothing to do with it, but I didn't want to take the plea," he said.

Court records show Orsini notified Darden's attorney last August that Galloway had vouched for his innocence. It was unclear Friday whether authorities investigated the man who was rumored to be the other robber.

Orsini could not be reached for comment.

City Attorney Mark Stiles said the city did nothing wrong. As soon as evidence that cleared Darden was discovered, prosecutors agreed to drop his charges and Darden was released, he said. They retained the right to refile them if more evidence is discovered.

"I don't think the city or its agents were negligent in this case or did anything wrong here," Stiles said.

Shawn Day, (757) 222-5131, shawn.day@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Backwards eh?

I suppose when you have lived in Richmond, DC and LA and experience the higher crime rates you can come back here and call us backwards! LOL! That sure is some friend he had there isn't it? His "FRIEND" let him stay in jail for a year when all he had to do was admit to the crime in the first place! He should sue his "FRIEND" too!

Virginia Beach.

VB easily has the WORST police department, judicial system, and civic goverment of all the Hampton Roads cities.

Why people live there, I have no idea.

Most people on here do not

Most people on here do not understand that if he gets $200k that money comes out of all our pockets as taxpayers.

Let's see, $7k for lawyer, $100k for room, board and "security", no drive-bys in jail.

Why not save a backlog in the courts and everyone toss him $5 for his time.

The man was held without

The man was held without bail because they thought he was a flight risk, not because they found him guilty. He has been found guilty 14 times since Dec 2004 and has served minimal jail time. He was looking at a very long time in jail if convicted. Do you think he would just hang around to see what happened?

Convicted 14 times in 4 1/2 years, how many crimes did he commit that we don't know about? He definitely has no respect for any laws, what makes you think he would show up in court when it was time.......because it is the law?

I think not.

Agree with inescapableHR

It is painful to see another example of justice taking a backseat to expedience. InescapableHR is spot on when he cites the problem of prosecutors focused on convictions.

The commonwealth attorney is responsible for putting justice before convictions. Until we have a change in the commonwealth attorney, and maybe the challenger Mark Hardman is the man, convictions will remain paramount.

absurd comments here

Several of the commenters seem to suggest that 1) he is probably guilty anyway, and should prove his innocence first and foremost; 2) he should probably not be allowed to sue; 3) if he does sue, he should sue the witness and the guilty party first; and 4) if the City pays him anything, it should be calculated strictly from lost wages.

False imprisonment is the second-worst thing the State can impose on you. This case should be an absolute clarion to the community, to DEMAND that the police and prosecutors remember that their #1 job is to find the people who are ACTUALLY guilty and prosecute them -- NOT to just clear the cases and close the files by locking up somebody who can't prove his innocence. The presumption of innocence takes enough of a beating every day, just by the way our system is set up. But the abhorrent thing you had here, you will get when the people charged with defending the constitution and laws become focused on convictions above all else.

I agree with dabrother......

Hampton Roads is one of the most backward, racist places in the nation. I grew up there, left for college, (Maryland) when I was 18, returned at 24, left again at 30, and have since lived in DC, Richmond, Los Angeles and for the last 10 years DC again. When I return to visit (I have family there) I always feel like I'm going back in time, in a bad way. If someone spends a year in jail for a crime they didn't commit, why shouldn't they be compensated? It's only fair and trust just that the gentleman be compensated in a timely matter so that he is able to get back with his life. The Beach will settle, believe me they will. I hope that Hampton Roads will one day catch up with the rest of the USA.

Pay him the money

I find it strange to hear the comments from those who say that he does not deserve any payment. It's like saying, "we need more prisons, but not in my back yard, or we don't need to sue doctors for malpractice except when it's your leg they cut off when you went in for tonsillitis. Give me a beak and him his monies!

Anybody remember Craig Bell?

More of Virginia Beach's fine investigative tactics. Ignore the evidence that doesn't go with what you've determined.

The victim mistakenly

The victim mistakenly pointed out this person as the suspect. The officers make the arrest. The Commonwealth's Attorney asks the court to not let the suspect bond out because of the extreme violence of the charge and the Judge agrees. I'm not sure who, if anyone, would be at fault. It's a crappy situation all the way around and yes the person was in jail for an offense he did not committ, but what would it say if public servants did not do their job, especially when a victim points the finger...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox