©
Arthur Whitfield, 55, has spent half his life trying to undo the damage from wrongful convictions for two rapes in 1981. The documented miscarriages of justice include nearly 22 years in prison before DNA test results set him free, a subsequent pardon that took more than four years, and now, absurd legal technicalities that prevent him from getting a paltry $15,000 from the state for the decades he wrongly spent in prison.
Despite all this, Whitfield remains remarkably free of anger and bitterness. He told The Pilot's Michelle Washington, "I understand that life isn't easy, but I thought it would be a little bit better than what it is."
It should be. Whitfield was 27 when he was sent to prison for 63 years for two rapes in Norfolk's Ghent neighborhood, largely on the basis of an identification by a victim. That was before DNA tests were commonplace, before evidence from a crime scene could provide an irrefutable link to a defendant or eliminate him as a suspect.
While in prison - two decades away from his family, away from any chance of earning a wage or putting money away for retirement - Whitfield earned his general equivalency diploma. He took classes in commercial cleaning and brick masonry.
In 2003, when DNA tests on old evidence began clearing a few defendants across Virginia, Whitfield asked the state to see whether the tests could be done in his case.
Two state officials helped Whitfield's case immeasurably. Mary Jane Burton, a state forensic lab analyst who has since died, preserved biological evidence, including Whitfield's, at a time when it was not required. And Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney Jack Doyle pursued Whitfield's freedom as soon as the DNA tests in 2004 showed he was innocent.
Doyle, now a judge, petitioned the state parole board for Whitfield's immediate release. In April, three months ago, Gov. Tim Kaine pardoned Whitfield. The pardon erases his conviction, removes his name from the state's sex offender registry and takes him off probation.
But it doesn't result in compensation for the time Whitfield spent behind bars, even though his circumstances are exactly the kind the legislature envisioned addressing. Whitfield's lawyer applied for a $15,000 transition grant to help his client until the legislature can study his case and determine how much compensation Whitfield is owed.
Absurdly, the law says such grants can be given only to people still in prison, a condition that essentially requires Virginia to keep innocent people behind bars.
Whitfield now has a job but no car. The gas and water in his apartment have been turned off because he couldn't pay the bills.
He has suffered enough. More than enough.
This latest situation begs for a lawmaker to navigate the system on Whitfield's behalf and get him the help he needs. Sen. Ken Stolle says he will check into Whitfield's case. So should the rest of the General Assembly. Arthur Whitfield deserves help, not further delay in putting back together a life that the state helped take apart.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Someone in power needs to right this wrong.
I see that after some pressure from the people a honor student was able to finally graduate after some beaucrats in Richmond got in the way. I think that the same kind of public pressure needs to happen in this situation as well. I am not sure of all the details but after 22 years of wrongful imprisonment, 15 thousand dollars is not too much to ask to give to this poor gentlemen. This is another case of when you leave it up to the wheels of government to turn, they tend to lock up. I sure hope that someone with some authority like the govenor makes this situation right and soon.
I agree with what is being said..
here in this editorial. But until the legal wranglings are resolved, those billionaires who own the Pilot could get themselves some good PR (from their own paper no less) if they stepped up and provided something for this man.
Time to Step Up
Assuredly the wrong man was sent to prison but how does that make the city guilty? The city presented their evidence and a jury or a judge determined the guilt. Even to consider the state guilty is a stretch unless their process, procedures or law were flawed. Lacking any information to the contrary, the government did the job they were hired by the city to do in seeking a conviction using the evidence available to them at the time. With the passage of time evidence gathering and processing have advanced to an entire new level of sophistication that has resulted in the release of a wrongfully convicted individual. Should the tax payer reimburse him fairly and honestly for the error? Sure, but its not a question of guilt on the government’s part.
Time to step up
Now is the time for the city of Norfolk and the state of Virginia to step up and admit that they made a mistake. Give this man a fair settlement for not being allowed to remain a free man and earn a living for himself or anyone else. He should be paid no less than $5.oo per hour, times 40 hours per week, times 52 weeks, times 22 years for a total of $228,800 nothing less should even be considered. He shouldn't have any legal fees to pay NONE AT ALL. So come on Norfolk cough it up, write the check and help this guy to get his life back. After all you helped to screw it up.