Author Grisham writing movie script about Norfolk murder

Posted to: News Norfolk Norfolk Four

NORFOLK

Author John Grisham says he is writing a screenplay about one of the city's most notorious murder cases - the rape and slaying of young Navy wife Michelle Moore-Bosko.

Moore-Bosko, 18, was killed in her apartment in Ocean View. Her husband, William, found her body July 8, 1997, when he returned to Norfolk from a Navy deployment.

The case had twists and turns from the beginning: First, a single man, Moore-Bosko's neighbor Danial Williams, was charged with murder. Six months later, a second man, Joseph Dick Jr., was also charged.

In the months that followed, a total of eight men were arrested. Charges against three were withdrawn. Four of the five men convicted now say their confessions to the crimes were coerced and that they are innocent. Their lawyers say one man, Omar Ballard, the last man to be charged in the crime and the only suspect whose DNA was found at the scene, committed the killing alone.

Williams, Dick and Derek Tice, convicted of rape and murder, and Eric Wilson, who was convicted only of rape, have asked the governor for pardons.

Several of Grisham's legal thrillers - "The Firm," "The Pelican Brief" and "A Time to Kill," to name a few - have been turned into movies. Grisham was a lawyer and legislator before becoming an author.

Grisham said he believes the men are innocent.

"I strongly believe they were wrongfully convicted," he said.

Grisham wrote to several lawyers involved in the case to ask for interviews.

"The production company plans to start filming in Norfolk next year," Grisham wrote.

Reached at his office last week, Grisham said he first became interested in the case a couple of years ago after reading a New York Times Magazine article. Friends who work at the Innocence Project, an organization that works to overturn wrongful convictions, also talked to him about the convicted sailors.

Since Grisham began research for his nonfiction book "The Innocent Man," about a man wrongfully convicted of murder in Ada, Okla., he said, work on wrongful conviction issues takes second place only to writing.

"I got totally ambushed by it," Grisham said of the subject. "I was a lawyer for 10 years, and I never had a client I thought was wrongfully convicted."

Grisham said the story of the Norfolk men who proclaim their innocence - called "the Norfolk Four" by some - is the most compelling he has seen.

"There's no physical evidence," he said. "It gets into this unbelievable world of false confession."

Grisham acknowledged that condensing the Moore-Bosko case into a two-hour movie would be difficult - there were trials, retrials, appeals and the still-pending pardon petitions. The investigation that led to the arrests of the eight men lasted two years.

"I haven't finished the screenplay," Grisham said. "There are so many characters, so many moving parts. I've been through it seven or eight times with my own books. You start off any adaptation by asking 'What can I cut back on?' "

He sent 15 to 18 letters, he said, and has talked to a handful of lawyers who worked on the cases. Allan Zaleski, one of the lawyers who represented Tice, said his client gave him permission to speak to Grisham. Zaleski said he believes Tice should get a pardon.

"It's a case that just defies logic," Zaleski said. "I don't know how it will be portrayed by Mr. Grisham."

Grisham said he did not know how he would handle talking to two crucial people in the case: Michelle Moore-Bosko's parents, John and Carol Moore.

The Moores have stated repeatedly that they think the men convicted are guilty of the crimes. In an e-mail sent Friday, the Moores reacted to news of the screenplay with despair.

"Our family is devastated to learn that once again, people with inaccurate information and personal agendas are attempting to profit from the tragic death of our daughter," they wrote. "Their lack of genuine compassion for what we have experienced through this never-ending nightmare is overwhelming. Please do not put us through this again."

In writing "The Innocent Man," Grisham said, he became very close to the victim's mother and niece, and they still keep in touch. But if the Moores firmly believe in the guilt of the imprisoned men, Grisham said, they may not have much to talk about.

Meanwhile, Tice, Williams, Dick and Wilson still await word from the governor's office. Late last year, Gov. Timothy M. Kaine said he would have to disregard more than a dozen confessions to pardon the men.

Grisham said he didn't know whether a movie would help or hurt their cause.

"I don't know if they can be helped," he said. "They have many years to go in prison."

Michelle Washington, (757) 446-2287, michelle.washington@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Leave Michelle alone

I am saddened by the fact that yet another person is standing by to make yet another profit from this brutal murder. Mr. and Mrs. Moore and Billy Bosko have suffered enough devastation with the tragic death of their daughter and young wife. Personal agendas (profit) and inaccurate information continue to be others focus while family members continually try to find some peace in knowing that Michelle is in fact...in a “better” place. What a lot of you don’t know is that Mr. Grisham has been in cahoots with Tom Wells, the author of the Norfolk Four, since the beginning. Mr. Wells is another person who was looking only to gain profit for “his version” of the facts surrounding Michelle’s murder. Many who were interviewed by Mr. Wells were done so under the auspices that Mr. Wells thought the case was an “interesting story” which needed to be told. It wasn’t until the book was released that those interviewed realized Mr. Wells’s true agenda. He lied to many of us and “most” of the quotes depicted in his book were taken out of context and made to fit how he wanted to depict the characters of his sage as incompetent prosecutors and defense lawyers, and corru

Also, her parents/family

Also, her parents/family have been quoted (everytime I have read a quote by them actually or a quote said to be by them) that they thought those men were guilty. So, how did Grisham get so close and he has no idea about their opinion?
Also, does he have to get their permission for something like this? To exploit someone's story and put them through this? I just can't imagine him being that close to her Mother....makes no sense based on past interviews I've read about the family. They just want her to rest in peace and for all this all to go away.

I followed this trial/story

I followed this trial/story for years...and the years after when the Pilot would rehash it. And try to contact Michelle's parents for "comments" (which is just rude and shocking). I was the same age as Michelle when she was killed and we lived only a couple miles away. I think she simply befriended the wrong man and he's the only guilty one. I struggled for a long time reading about these idiot's confessions and what not. You would think the Navy would have helped them obtain competent attorneys but I guess it doesn't work that way. I wonder if they had found her but didn't report it. I wonder what their real involvement was. If they could have prevented it (some of them were good friends with her if I recall correctly). It was a shame - the whole story. Beautiful girl marries her high school sweetheart, moves here to start a life and her husband finds her murdered when she didn't pick him up from an underway period. Very sad.

Check the Record

Start by searching for "Innocence Project" and "Norfolk Four". Read everything. Draw your own conclusions. I have read as much as I could find, and, in MY mind, there is no doubt that, after many hours of interrogation (sorry, no tapes, no lawyer present), these guys were convinced that their only options were jail or the death sentence. Trouble is, if you read all 4 confessions, they did not agree as to the room the murder took place in, the weapon used, etc. All of the discrepancies were ignored because "they confessed".

I agree that the parents have been through hell. I think that being locked up for 20+ years for a crime you did not commit is pretty rough too.

All I ask is, that before you comment, you do a little research. it might change your viewpoint...

I have gone to those sites...

as you suggested. I did NOT see what I am hoping to locate at some site (if they are indeed available), the actual transcripts of the interviews with the defendants where they confessed. I don't think I overlooked them. I did see the conclusions arrived at by the experts on those sites, and I am not disputing those. I merely would like the opportunity to view them (or better yet, HEAR them) myself.

Also, research will show that there are those who absolutely believe in the veracity of the confessions, including jurors who listened to the tapes themselves, and they claim that they could not detect any coercion being used.

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-100419.html

That site is one of many that bundles different news articles about the case. Until I have more to go on, my comments will support the official conclusions arrived at.

Thank you

Thanks guy, for at leas taking the time to study the matter. For now, we will need to agree to disagree.

Please keep in mind a couple of things, however. There is absolutely NO physical evidence of any type linking these men to the crime scene. While all 4 "confessed", none of the 4 confessed to anything approaching the same crime. And, while the confessions were recorded, it is quite curious to me that the interrogations most certainly were NOT recorded.

Also, it is a documented fact that, according to Innocence Project, "About 25 percent of the over 220 wrongful convictions overturned by DNA evidence in the U.S. have involved some form of a false confession."

http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/314.php

More and more, it is becoming obvious that confessions in the absence of any physical evidence are not reliable.

Once again, thanks for caring enough to do the research, even if we diagree on the conclusions to be drawn...

Bear in mind..

my conclusions are not based on any desires or choices. I want justice served in all cases, and I want to make darned sure that innocent people are not punished (that old "there but for the grace of God go I" thing). But this particular case has gone on like this from it's beginning. There certainly appear to be lots of inconsistencies from many of the players involved here. Ballard, who is now presumed to be the only one guilty, has offered conflicting testimony himself, to the point that his credibility is questionable, to some. I just haven't seen or heard anything that proves the others claims that they were coerced.

If those transcripts and/or tapes are made available, I can have a better opportunity to decide one way or the other. I acn assure you and all others, NOBODY will clamor louder than myself to free these guys if that can be proven to me, beyond any doubts. Until then, I have to stand by the conclusions of 'the system'. I have nothing else to go on. But I want justice properly, and correctly, served! If you are actively involved with this, I offer a hardy "good luck" in your endeavors.

Of course...

a defense lawyer is going to say his client should be pardoned, is innocent, ect. That said, it may be instructive if the transcripts, or better yet, the tapes if they exist, of the interviews with the suspects that led to the confessions were released, to see if any coersion did take place. That's the single most damning thing about this, those confessions, and many convicts claim that such confessions are coerced. The fact that Kaine and his successors haven't touched this shows that there appears to be much to the evidence that convicted these guys. This poor girl is the only one who has no one who can speak for her. I think it's wrong of Grisham to write a screenplay at this point, before the governor has decided one way or the other. This girl's family has been thru Hell.

I'm reminded of what transpired concerning Earl Washington. His champions, especially at the Pilot, claimed that he was coerced and taken advantage of in making a confession to a crime he didn't commit. Yet, in an article the Pilot saw fit to print but not comment on, all investigations of the conduct, techniques, and processes used by the detectives and investigators involved showed no coercion ever took

Post sompletion...

Yet, in an article the Pilot saw fit to print but not comment on, all investigations of the conduct, techniques, and processes used by the detectives and investigators involved showed no coercion ever took place, that everything had been done correctly. These things cannot be tried or determined in the media.

Sorry..

I meant "Kaine and his predecessors" in the orignal post..

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features