The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
A Virginia Beach Navy corpsman has filed a lawsuit against the defense contracting giant KBR, claiming he suffered burns and nerve damage from an electrical shock when company workers mistakenly turned on a generator in Iraq in 2007.
This is the latest in a string of lawsuits and federal investigations targeting alleged faulty electrical work by KBR in Iraq since the Texas-based company obtained a lucrative contract to provide electrical service there.
At least 16 service members and two American contractors have died from electrocution in Iraq since the war began in 2003, and thousands more have been injured from shocks, according to media and government reports.
Petty Officer 2nd Class Peter Taylor of Sir Barton Drive in Virginia Beach was serving as a hospital corpsman with a Marine unit at Camp Fallujah in the summer of 2007 when he was injured. At the time, KBR had a contract to provide maintenance and management, including electrical service, to the camp.
His lawsuit seeks $2.5 million and was filed in U.S. District Court on Friday. It says "KBR's main electrical generator at Camp Fallujah was frequently malfunctioning or not functioning resulting in the armed service personnel at a critical forward operating base to be without electrical power."
On July 27 of that summer, Taylor and a group of Marines, fed up with the constant lack of electrical power, decided to hook up their own generator. To do this, they disconnected KBR's main generator in that area, the lawsuit says.
While Taylor and the others worked on an electrical box, a group of KBR electricians came by and "were specifically advised to not turn on the main generator until notified by the Marines," the lawsuit states.
The KBR workers acknowledged the request, but while the Marines were still working on the box, the KBR electricians inexplicably turned on the main generator, the lawsuit says.
Taylor had his hands on the wiring at that moment and "a powerful electrical current" went through him and he "had to be forcefully pulled from the wiring box to stop from being electrocuted," the suit says.
Taylor suffered third-degree burns on his hands and wrists plus nerve damage. He spent months at the Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio and is now home. The suit claims that his hands still don't function properly.
Taylor was not available for an interview Monday. His lawyer, Stephen Swain of Virginia Beach, said he recognized KBR's history in Iraq before filing the suit.
"Basically it shows a pattern of what was going on in the way they handled their people. So many times, the war profiteer folks across the way in Iraq and Afghanistan do not utilize the highest measure of safety," he said.
"Any company over there making the kind of money they're making should use the utmost standard of care, which we don't believe was being used in this case," he said.
KBR spokeswoman Heather Browne said she was not familiar with the Taylor lawsuit and could not comment on it. She did not respond to other e-mail questions.
Service members killed or injured in a war zone may have trouble suing military contractors. They are already prohibited from suing the government.
A federal appeals court ruled earlier this month that military personnel cannot sue private contractors in American courts for damages sustained on the battlefield. The family of an Army sergeant, who was critically injured when his truck, driven by a KBR worker, overturned in Iraq, had sued KBR and its former parent Halliburton.
But there are other suits still making their way through the system. None has yet to reach the U.S. Supreme Court.
Of the 18 people who died from electrocution in Iraq, the government has linked only one death directly to KBR. However, the company has sternly denied its workers caused any deaths or injuries.
The New York Times and The Associated Press reported earlier this year that an Army investigation into the electrocution of Green Beret Staff Sgt. Ryan D. Maseth of Pennsylvania found "credible information" that his death was the result of criminal negligence by KBR workers. Maseth's family is also suing KBR.
William C. Bodie, KBR's interim president of government and infrastructure, issued a statement in May denouncing damaging media reports of federal investigations into the company.
"There is no link between faulty KBR wiring and electrocutions, nor is KBR aware of any Pentagon investigation that has made such a link," the statement said.
The Defense Department has acknowledged an investigation into KBR's electrical work in Iraq and issued a scathing report last fall, citing "serious noncompliance" with its contract.
"This failure is widespread and manifests itself primarily in electrical service deficiencies," according to a letter sent to KBR by the Pentagon's Defense Contract Management Agency. "As such, this failure has created immediate life, health and safety hazards for our deployed personnel," the letter said.
Tim McGlone, (757) 446-2343, tim.mcglone@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


leave the partisanship out of it
Want an education on the subject? The DOD Inspector General recently issued three reports on the electrocutions. http://www.dodig.mil/PUBS/index.html
It may take some effort for those of you that aren't used to thinking for yourselves, but I believe in you.
KBR, Halliburton, Blackwater
People have been electrocuted while taking showers after KBR finished constructing barracks for Army personnel. KBR routinely billed US Army for serving meals to enlisted personnel that were never served. KBR inflated costs for supplying gasoline to the US forces more than double the going rate when they got it in nearby Kuwait. All these contract were given to KBR without having to be bid against any other companies. It seems insan that a company like KBR could perform shoddy work over and over again, then overbill the government and yet continue to get no bid contracts.
The missing piece of the puzzle here- KBR is owned by Halliburton, and Halliburton was run by Vice President Cheney up until the 2000 election. Our tax dollars have been given away to rebuild Iraq but the only one who benefited were VP Cheney and his friends. This has cost taxpayers 3 Trillion Dollars so far and before the war, Cheney and Bush said Iraqi oil revenues would pay for the cost of the war. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Dick doesn't live here anymore
So its your assertion that Dick Cheney is controlling the current administration, ensuring Haliburton et al maintain their contracts?
Are all of these KBR contractors...
Americans? I ask because of the line that says the contractors were specifically told not to turn on the generator, might something have been lost in the translation? I am familiar with requirements for tags to be placed on breakers and boxes when work is being performed. I am also familiar with urgent situations involving military equipment while deployed and/or underway where corners may have to be cut to bring systems back up online ASAP. I'm just wondering if anything is NOT being reported here.
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
Come on give me a break. Anyone that has ever been over there you are not according to regulations Do any work that is supposed to be done by contractors. If fact it is against the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulations (DFAR) and is punishable by fines and prison time. Also when working on any electrical system you must lock out the box and post someone there to ensure it is not switched back on. I am sorry he was injured but come on his lack of knowledge and own stupidity lead to it. To tell the truth if the Navy were to do thing the way that the regulation state. He would be responsible for all cost incurred by this accident such as hospital and physical therapy cost… Notice the word accident that is what this was!!!!
Contractor Suit
If the suit should succeed shouldn’t the individual lose any claim to gov benefits arising from service during that period or from the injury? If the individual is compensated by the contractor for the injury why should tax payers also have to subsidize the results of the injury? If successful in the suit he should lose all military entitlements/benefits arising from the event or injury. Otherwise we are just looking at an individual’s greed.
briefly...
When the military treats your injuries, then a third party such as an insurance company grants compensation for medical expenses, the military typically places a lien on the award for the cost of the treatment. If he wins punitive damages, that money is his to keep (and IMO should have no bearing on any other entitlements or benefits).
However, if a line of duty investigation shows that he had no business tinkering with the electrical ssytem and therefore contributed to his own injuries, that could have substantial effect on future military compensation.
Electrician does surgery..............
A corpsman doing electrical work! Anyone missing this vital point?
I'm with you on this one...
A HM (Hospital Corpsman) is now an ET (Electrician's Mate)??? The military cross trains it's personnel in a lot of areas but that is not one of them. There should have been a watch posted at the main power to ENSURE no one re-energized it until it was cleared. The fault lies with ALL parties here. You dont circumvent safety procedures because you are fed up, this person should get nothing because he put his own life in danger unless he was qualified and designated to do so. Then the question would still remain of why the main power did not have a watch posted.
The outcome should be interesting.
get your ratings straight, msrat1
An Electrician's Mate is an EM. An ET is an Electronics Technician.
I guess by your comment that "The military cross trains it's personnel in a lot of areas but that is not one of them." you know all of the talents of this particular person. Perhaps he was an electrician before joining the Navy. Did you ever consider that?
I guess you've never undertaken a task without thorough training....