77°
forecast

Bill on cocaine vs. crack sentencing passes House panel

Posted to: News Politics

U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott scored a victory Wednesday in his bid to put an end to a law that imposes tougher penalties on people sent to prison for possessing crack cocaine than those who possess powder cocaine.

The House Judiciary Committee approved the 3rd District Democrat's bill, known as the Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act, or HR3245.

The bill from Scott, whose district includes Portsmouth and parts of Norfolk and extends up to Richmond, would end a law that requires a mandatory five-year sentence for possession of at least 5 grams of crack cocaine. Someone must possess at least 500 grams of powder cocaine to face the same mandatory sentence.

The tougher penalty for crack was adopted in the 1980s.

If approved, Scott's bill would make no distinction between the two forms of the drug, requiring a mandatory five-year sentence for possessing 500 grams or more of either type.

The House panel voted 16-9 in support of the measure. Scott voted for it; the other local legislator on the committee, Republican Randy Forbes of the 4th District, opposed it.

The stiffer penalty for crack, which is a cheaper form of the drug, has been criticized because it has disproportionately affected poor and black drug users.

"For 20 years, the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentencing has been a blight on our justice system," Michael Macleod-Ball, leader of the American Civil Liberties Union's Washington office, said in a statement. "This historic legislation is long overdue."

The bill now moves to a full vote in the House. President Barack Obama and U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder also have called for an end to the sentencing disparity.

Bill Bartel, (757) 446-2398, bill.bartel@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Good Going !

Does he not have anything to do?? Why is he worried about making the system fair for Crack Heads?? Are they voting or paying taxes?? Make the system fair for me! Stop jacking up my taxes!

facts

The fact is that your taxes are being "jacked up" because of the number of people incarcerated in the federal system for $45000 a year. I will be the first to tell you that selling cocaine, crack, or any type of illegal drug does warrant prison time. The disproportionate amount of time that blacks and other minoritites are serving for the same drug doesn't speak highly for our country's judicial system or for our progress in the demise of racial inequalities. Besides the form of the drug, there are no differences between the effects of powder cocaine or crack. It hurts my heart to even admit that these inequalities still exist in this day and time. My uncle was a narcotics agent killed in the line of duty in 1983. His killer has more of a chance at a second chance than a low level drug dealer who chooses not to make up stories and have more people jailed for a charge of "conspiracy". So you want to make the system fair, do your homework and understand how hr 3245 will make things better for us all.

Wrong Direction

Obama, Scott and Holder need to seperate themseleves from the ACLU. All three all black and are not helping their race to eliminate the use and sale of drugs by not passing stiffer sentencing penalties. Scotts bill makes no sense at all. Increasing the possession limits from 5 grams to 500 grams for crack cocaine is heading in the wrong direction. Why not go in the other direction and make no distinction between crack cocaine and powder cocaine and require a mandatory five-year sentence for possessing 5 grams or more of either type. Chalk one up for the liberals who are just looking at this becasuse the present law for possessing crack cocaine in their view creates sentencing disparity by affecting poor and black drug users. What about the drug dealers who stand on the corners and push their drugs in the black neighborhoods. Talk about racial profiling and not helping your own race combat the use of drugs. Cocaine is cocaine and it is destroying this country and affects all races.

Cocaine

Well people do not have money anymore with the recession , even addicts or kids that wanna have fun in Amsterdam , better find a crack addiction treatment and you will save lots of cash from drugs.

conversion

If my math is good 500g is equal to 1.1 lbs.
Please tell me why on earth anyone needs an ounce or any less than 500g

I need at least 500 grams

I need at least 500 grams before I start reading the news here, otherwise, it just doesn't hold my attention.

Drug Test

it is mny opinion that each and every congressperson and their staff need to be tested once a month.

Crack Users Holiday!!

This bill just gave crack users five hundred percent more freedom than before. They will now have to have five hundred percent more crack to get the tougher sentence than before. Way to go Bobby! Even if it's a federal law the state will soon follow suit and the state courts will follow the leader. Way to go Bobby! All the idiots did was make things worse. Way to go Bobby! Do you think these druggies really give a tinkers darn about a misdemeanor? Your going to see crack use go through the roof! Way to go Bobby!

Federal criminal code, not state

To be fair to some of you geniuses, the story doesn't make it clear - but, this bill would change a sentencing disparity for people facing *federal* criminal charges in *federal* court. Not a "states' rights" issue at all - unless you want to raise the question of how Congress purports to have the power to enact broad criminal statutes, in which case I will be happy to agree that the breadth of current federal criminal law represents a real overreach.

Anyone interested in the actual issue presented in this story - rather than tossing around veiled racism and ill-informed cliches about the (unwinnable) Drug War - could do worse than to read:

http://www.drugpolicy.org/drugwar/mandatorymin/crackpowder.cfm

Racist Drugs?

The stiffer penalty for crack, which is a cheaper form of the drug, has been criticized because it has disproportionately affected poor and black drug users.

Huh. Who’da thunk: Bobby Scott and the ACLU are now finding racism in cocaine. I guess if a white person uses crack and not powdered cocaine, he is in fact a racist druggie.

What’s worse, Bobby Scott’s “victory” is negating the effect of law by increasing the limit on what would result in the five-year prison term.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox