77°
forecast

Higher-speed rail diverted in Richmond

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

Pardon those of us in South Hampton Roads for nursing a transportation persecution complex, but it's hard not to get a little suspicious after looking at the five options being considered for providing higher-speed passenger rail service to the region.

Only one of five alternatives envisions enough daily trips in and out of the south side to make the trains a meaningful alternative to driving. Three of the options offer nothing at all for the 1 million people who live here. In contrast, the Peninsula stands to see improvements to its existing and decrepit Amtrak service in four out of the five alternatives.

If that's not enough to inspire frustration and perhaps paranoia, there are the kooky cost estimates being used by state officials to suggest a south side route would be far more expensive than a Peninsula line.

The $412 million price tag hung on the rail upgrades for South Hampton Roads includes $150 million for a stretch from Richmond to Petersburg. That same rail segment is also counted in a separate project to construct high-speed rail from Washington to Petersburg, part of a corridor that ultimately will run along the East Coast.

The cost is being double-counted, and the south side project looks hugely expensive because of it.

State officials haven't released estimates for individual projects involving the Peninsula yet, but they have said that the cheapest alternative is $330 million. That makes the south side route actually cheaper. Take out the Richmond-to-Petersburg segment, and it weighs in at just $262 million.

In short, the south side route will serve twice as many people and cost less than improvements to the Peninsula rail line.

Officials with Norfolk Southern, who own the south side tracks along U.S. 460, have publicly questioned the state's estimates as excessive, but the Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation continues to use the figures and has presented them to the Federal Railroad Administration, which will make a final decision on what it will fund.

It's not too late for political, business and community leaders in South Hampton Roads to make their pitch for higher-speed rail, but they need to understand they're starting off at an undeserved disadvantage. That means they're going to have to work harder and bellow louder, or they're going to be left out.

That would be a tremendous mistake. Seventy percent of Hampton Roads' population lives south of the James River. Sixty-seven percent of its businesses are located there, as well as its largest tourist attraction, Virginia Beach. South Hampton Roads is the second-largest population center in the state, yet it has no passenger rail service whatsoever.

State rail officials have rejected the idea of focusing all resources on the south side to the exclusion of the Peninsula. Under their list of options, the best South Hampton Roads can hope for is to share in federal rail funding with the Peninsula.

This region has long been gripped by a debilitating mentality that says any revenues must be spread thinly across multiple projects and communities to avoid upsetting anyone. That paralyzing mind-set appears to be surfacing once again, this time condoned and encouraged by the state.

The result - as it has been for years now - may well be that by refusing to make difficult choices about where to spend money, the entire region will end up with nothing.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

HighER Speed Rail is SLOWER than high speed rail

Pay close attention to the terms being used. HighER Speed Rail is SLOWER than high speed rail. HighER speed rail often offers a total travel time from point A to point B that takes the same time or longer than driving. One would hope that if hundreds of millions of tax dollars are being spent we could offer something that is actually faster and less expensive then the transportation system we already have. Real HIGH Speed rail would get us to Washington D.C. much faster than the S-L-O-W rail system being discussed now. Why not try to do better? Why not real HIGH speed rail?

It is a sad commentary

on American technology when we are bickering over moderately fast trains while many industrialized nations have had genuine high speed (200 mph, and even close to 300 mph) rail service. And they have had those for decades.

Now we have clogged roads and airline transportation that is a disgrace, with not much hope of improvement.

No one, government or private industry, had more forethought than the next election or the next quarter's profits. And now that we are out of money, we are also out of decent, well maintained and modern infrastructure for moving people and speeding commerce.

So now we are fighting over a railway that at best will average 50 mph.

Wow?

TOPICAL ASSIGNMENT

The Weather Channel on-camera folks still refer to this segment of VA as "Tidewater", and did so even when this Channel was owned by Landmark!

About a dozen or so years ago, when the CSX/NS/CONRAIL matter was in progress, a PILOT staff member - Christopher Dinsmore - capably reported upon and analyzed, when necessary, some of the varied and complex issues which frequently arose. While PILOT personnel matters may be "off limits" to outsiders, none-the-less a suggestion is hereby rendered for VP management to consider the assignment of Mr. Dinsmore to the "High[er] Speed Trains" beat. No doubt he could "sort-things-out", as he did so with the CONRAIL situation roughly a decade ago.

I thought...

I thought Hampton Roads was the area surrounding Fort Wool... (HAH!, now I have you looking that one up!)

Regionalism?...You Betcha!

So we are now "south hampton roads", and "the peninsula"? What ever happened to one big happy family?

It's no wonder no one take tidewater seriously. We can't even decide what to call ourselves!

Battenville wasn't "catchy" enough a 2.3 gazillion $ study said

Not to worry, the regionalist rag known as the Virginian-Pilot will solve that problem once they unveil the results of their latest study. I didn't want to steal their thunder or anything, but soon we will be called "Battenville - Americas first Gulag". The fine comrades at Future Hampton Roads are ordering new stationary as we speak. Finally, we will all be one big happy collective under strict control of the small cabal of business elites and the local progressive leadership at ODU, NSU, EVMS, TCC, and CNU. Regent University will be closed and converted into "Affordable Housing". We will all ride bikes and be moved into "pedestrian friendly TOD communities", thus enjoying fantastic health and an end to that evil "suburban sprawl" (shutter). Yes .. "Future Battenville" will end the pettry bickering of the uneducated masses that interfer with the Grande Plan. One ring to rule them all ... and finally Mike Barrett will get his title as "Lord Barret". All hail Runnymede!

state official:

"Isn't South Hampton Roads in England?"

Why are we considering doing this?

Okay - I understand the idea of taking a look at HIGH spped rail - because it offers faster service than driving - but please explain why we are discussing spending tax dollars on the far SLOWER rail service that is deceptively called "highER speed rail"? For what? Why would we consider spending hundreds of millions on SLOW passenger rail between Richmond and Tidewater? Who is supposed to use it and why?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox